Abstract
Demographic data extracted from discharge summaries by natural language processing was compared to data gathered by a conventional hospital admitting system. Discrepancies in data were noted in names, age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Some differences are attributable to errors in collection: interaction with patient, dictation, transcription, and data entry. Very few differences were due to errors in natural language processing. Other differences can be used to critique existing data, or to enhance data with more detailed information. Discrepancies in data as elementary as patient demographics raise the issue of resolving conflicts when neither source of data is known to be more reliable. Clinical repositories can represent conflicting data from multiple sources, but clinical information systems must bear the cost of increased complexity in the application programs that will use the data.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Friedman C., Sideli R. Tolerating spelling errors during patient validation. Comput Biomed Res. 1992 Oct;25(5):486–509. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(92)90005-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hripcsak G., Friedman C., Alderson P. O., DuMouchel W., Johnson S. B., Clayton P. D. Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing. Ann Intern Med. 1995 May 1;122(9):681–688. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-9-199505010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]