Abstract
Levels of activity of xanthine dehydrogenase in homogenates of individual flies were measured by fluorometry for three inbred strains and two large, randomly breeding, laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. The patterns of activity during the first five days following eclosion differed significantly between the inbred strains and the randomly breeding populations. In the latter, the levels rise from day 0 to day 2, then fall through day 4; in the former, the levels rise continuously throughout the period. The variances within days calculated on the logarithms of the observations are constant for the large populations, but show significant variability within and between the inbred strains. These differences parallel earlier observations on time of development and probability of embryonic success in the same strains. All these results suggest more effective regulatory mechanisms in the randomly breeding populations.
Full text
PDF





Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- CHOVNICK A., SCHALET A., KERNAGHAN R. P., KRAUSS M. THE ROSY CISTRON IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: GENETIC FINE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS. Genetics. 1964 Dec;50:1245–1259. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.6.1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GLASSMAN E. Convenient assay of xanthine dehydrogenase in single Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 1962 Sep 21;137(3534):990–991. doi: 10.1126/science.137.3534.990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HADORN E. Patterns of biochemical and developmental pleiotropy. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1956;21:363–373. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1956.021.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KELLER E. C., Jr, GLASSMAN E. A THIRD LOCUS (LXD) AFFECTING XANTHINE DEHYDROGENASE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:663–668. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KELLER E. C., Jr, GLASSMAN E. XANTHINE DEHYDROGENASE: DIFFERENCES IN ACTIVITY AMONG DROSOPHILA STRAINS. Science. 1964 Jan 3;143(3601):40–41. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3601.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
