Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium
. 1997:131–135.

Accuracy and efficiency of an automated system for calculating APACHE II scores in an intensive care unit.

V J Gooder 1, B R Farr 1, M P Young 1
PMCID: PMC2233464  PMID: 9357603

Abstract

We evaluated the reliability and efficiency of an automated system for calculating APACHE II scores. We imported an automated APACHE II scoring system developed at another institution. We scored a convenience sample of 50 consecutive intensive care unit (ICU) admissions using three methods: (1) the automated system (2) an expert scorer using a manual data abstraction method, and (3) the current manual scoring method used in the ICU. We analyzed interrater reliability among the three groups, and compared scoring time between the automated and the expert groups. Interrater reliability testing demonstrated a very high agreement between the computer and the expert scorers, (r = 0.97 p < 0.01) and a high agreement between the computer and the nursing staff (r = 0.80, p < 0.01). The mean time required to complete the data sheet manually and input data into a standalone computer manually was 4 minutes and 55 seconds, compared to total mean time of 33 seconds for the automated system. Automated APACHE II scoring yielded results more reliable than those of an expert scorer, as judged by a second researcher. The time required to score patients was reduced and reliability of scores was improved with use of an automated APACHE II scoring system.

Full text

PDF
131

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barriere S. L., Lowry S. F. An overview of mortality risk prediction in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1995 Feb;23(2):376–393. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199502000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger M. M., Marazzi A., Freeman J., Chioléro R. Evaluation of the consistency of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scoring in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1992 Dec;20(12):1681–1687. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199212000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castella X., Artigas A., Bion J., Kari A. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;23(8):1327–1335. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199508000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eddy D. M. Practice policies: where do they come from? JAMA. 1990 Mar 2;263(9):1265–passim. doi: 10.1001/jama.263.9.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibson R. F., Haug P. J. An automated Computerized Severity Index. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:332–336. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kalb P. E., Miller D. H. Utilization strategies for intensive care units. JAMA. 1989 Apr 28;261(16):2389–2395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Knaus W. A., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P., Zimmerman J. E. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knaus W. A., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P., Zimmerman J. E. An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Mar;104(3):410–418. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-3-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Knaus W. A., Wagner D. P., Draper E. A., Zimmerman J. E., Bergner M., Bastos P. G., Sirio C. A., Murphy D. J., Lotring T., Damiano A. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1619–1636. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.6.1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leape L. L. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994 Dec 21;272(23):1851–1857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ludwigs U., Hulting J. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system in acute myocardial infarction: a prospective validation study. Crit Care Med. 1995 May;23(5):854–859. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199505000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MILLER G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Oniki T. A., Clemmer T. P., Gardner R. M., Johnson K. V. Representative charting of vital signs in an intensive care unit. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:307–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Turner J. S., Mudaliar Y. M., Chang R. W., Morgan C. J. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) scoring in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1991 Oct;19(10):1266–1269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ziegler E. J., Fisher C. J., Jr, Sprung C. L., Straube R. C., Sadoff J. C., Foulke G. E., Wortel C. H., Fink M. P., Dellinger R. P., Teng N. N. Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with HA-1A human monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The HA-1A Sepsis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 14;324(7):429–436. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102143240701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES