Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
editorial
. 2004 May;123(5):471–473. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200409069

BK Channel News

Full Coverage on the Calcium Bowl

Edward G Moczydlowski 1
PMCID: PMC2234498  PMID: 15111642

The large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel (BKCa) is well positioned to assume diverse physiological functions because it is ubiquitously expressed in many cell types. Some of the functions recently proposed for this channel offer unexpected surprises, however, such as a role in innate immunity in neutrophil leukocytes (Ahluwalia et al., 2004), recognition as a heme-binding protein (Tang et al., 2003), behavioral responses to ethanol (Davies et al., 2003), and a protective mechanism against ischemic cell death in the inner mitochondrial membrane of cardiac myocytes (Xu et al., 2002). These novel occupations attributed to BKCa remain to be fully explored and validated before placing them along side the well-established physiological functions of this channel in the negative feedback regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ entry into nerve terminals (Robitaille et al., 1993), smooth muscle (Brayden and Nelson, 1992), and auditory hair cells of birds and turtles (Duncan and Fuchs, 2003). Nonetheless, the more we learn about the diverse roles of BKCa in the lives of cells, the greater our incentive to understand exactly how this hyperpolarizing K+-channel protein simultaneously senses both membrane voltage and intracellular Ca2+. Particularly so because BKCa is a member of a multigene family that includes Slo3, a Ca2+-insensitive K+ channel predominantly expressed in spermatocytes (Schreiber et al., 1998), and Slack and Slick, two closely related genes that encode Na+-activated K+ channels (Bhattacharjee et al., 2003; Yuan et al., 2003).

The surge in attention that BKCa has attracted is fueled partly by the fact that cloned BKCa genes (e.g., Drosophila slowpoke) are readily expressed in oocytes and cultured cell lines and that single-channel currents of BKCa can be recorded at high resolution over a wide range of open state probability. Biophysical analysis of single-channel, macroscopic, and gating currents previously led to the development of a 50-state kinetic model describing two-tiered allosteric activation of a voltage-dependent, homotetrameric channel protein that binds one Ca2+ ion per subunit in both closed and open states (Cox and Aldrich, 2000; Rothberg and Magleby, 2000). However, the most recent studies suggest that there are at least three Ca2+-activation sites per subunit, two high-affinity, Ca2+-specific sites and one low-affinity site that binds both Ca2+ and Mg2+ (Zhang et al., 2001; Bao et al., 2002; Shi et al., 2002; Xia et al., 2002). A recent review of the BKCa gating mechanism in this journal (Magleby, 2003) placed the latest tally of the “minimal” number of kinetic states at either 1,250 or 1,875, depending on whether we allow the luxury of a second tier of closed states. We are a long way afield from early modeling efforts, which attempted to limit the number of kinetic intermediates spanning the closed and open states to a meager handful (Methfessel and Boheim, 1982; Moczydlowski and Latorre, 1983). The modern kinetic analysis has provided powerful quantitative models capable of simulating the gating behavior of BKCa with high fidelity. The next challenge is the identification of the molecular basis for the different states, and several research groups have accepted this challenge by seeking biochemical evidence that may reveal structural information on the nature of the divalent cation binding sites and conformational changes that underlie the ∼1,875 intermediates of BKCa gating. This issue of the Journal of General Physiology treats us to a fresh perspective on this endeavor in the article by Bao et al. (2004).

This article focuses on a linear sequence of 28 residues, Thr883-Gln910, near the intracellular COOH-terminal end of mSlo, the channel-forming subunit encoded by the mouse BKCa gene. The functional significance of this particular region has been a subject of intense interest since Schreiber and Salkoff (1997) first named it the “Ca2+ bowl” and characterized it as a highly conserved motif in BKCa that is rich in acidic residues (eight Asp and two Glu residues) and results in greatly diminished Ca2+-sensitivity when altered by various mutations. Remarkably, Schreiber et al. (1999) also showed that a spliced segment containing the Ca2+ bowl conferred Ca2+ sensitivity to a chimeric channel using the normally Ca2+-independent tail region of Slo3. Although the effects of various substitutions and deletions within the Ca2+ bowl region have been previously characterized with respect to the Ca2+ dependence of gating (Schreiber and Salkoff, 1997), Bao et al. (2004) now provide the first systematic alanine-scanning mutagenesis of this region. They report the results of single Ala substitutions of 20 residues within the Ca2+ bowl, primarily selected for the presence of oxygen-containing side chains that could potentially participate in the direct coordination of Ca2+. The alanine scan was further performed in the background of a mutant, M513I, which was previously shown to completely suppress high-affinity responsiveness to Ca2+ when paired with a major deletion of the Ca2+ Bowl region (Bao et al., 2002). The assumption behind this latter strategic manipulation is that removal of a suspected “second site” for high-affinity Ca2+ activation allows the Ca2+-binding potential of the Ca2+ bowl to be studied in virtual isolation.

Analogous to attempts to deduce the essence of voltage sensing from serial mutations of individual residues of the S4 segments of voltage-gated ion channels, these experiments offer a provocative picture of the relative importance of amino acid side chains of the Ca2+ bowl. If we first consider the relative reduction of the shift, ΔV0.5, the change in the midpoint of the voltage activation curve from 0 to 10 μM Ca2+ (see Fig. 4 A of Bao et al., 2004, in this issue), 10 of the bowl residues may be classified as largely extraneous “cold” positions that alter the Ca2+-dependent shift of the control channel (−86 mV for M513I) by <30%. Another eight of the residues may be grouped as more interesting “medium” positions that inhibit the shift by 30–80%. Finally, two tantalizingly “hot” positions, D898 and D900, effectively abolish the shift by 95% and 84%, respectively—and these two hot residues are located in the middle of D895-P902, a “medium/hot” region that is a good candidate for a potential Ca2+-binding loop (Fig. 10 of Bao et al., 2004, in this issue). These results demonstrate that certain residues of the Ca2+ bowl matter more than others with respect to Ca2+-dependent activation and set the stage for a complementary series of follow-up experiments designed to test whether the same residues actually bind Ca2+.

Unfortunately, a reliable solution-based assay for Ca2+ binding to soluble domains of the BKCa channel is not yet available. The only system for monitoring Ca2+ binding at the present time is the 45Ca2+-overlay blot assay (Maruyama et al., 1984; Bian et al., 2001), a technique that has proven to reliably identify Ca2+-binding proteins such as calmodulin that contain EF-hand motifs. The BKCa channel does not have any internal sequences that definitively match the requirements for a canonical EF-hand motif, although Braun and Sy (2001) have described several regions that partially fit the EF-hand stereotype. Nevertheless, the COOH-terminal 280 residues of Drosophila BKCa (Bian et al., 2001) and the COOH-terminal 240 residues of mouse BKCa (Braun and Sy, 2001) do exhibit a positive 45Ca2+ signal in this assay that is suggestive of a bona fide Ca2+-binding protein.

Surprisingly, Bao et al. (2004) found that the two hot residues, D898 and D900, with the greatest effect on ΔV0.5 in the electrophysiological assay of Ca2+ dependence, also have a large inhibitory effect on 45Ca2+ binding to the COOH-terminal 240 residues of the mSlo region, 50% and 51%, respectively, as measured for single alanine mutants of these residues (see Fig. 8 A of Bao et al., 2004, in this issue). Four other “cold/medium” residues that have little effect on ΔV0.5, also have a small effect on the 45Ca2+ signal (<30%). However, spoiling the correlation, alanine mutation of an anomalous residue, D899, that has practically no effect on ΔV0.5, does have a rather large inhibitory effect (55%) on the 45Ca2+-binding signal. Double alanine mutations of pairs of residues, D898/D900 and D899/D901, tend to reinforce these trends. Both of these latter double mutants inhibit the 45Ca2+-binding signal in the range of 73–80%.

How should these results be interpreted with respect to the hypothesis that the Ca2+ bowl is the physical locus of a high-affinity binding site(s) coupled to voltage activation of the channel? Perhaps it is too soon to tell. The D899A mutation, which has practically no effect on the Ca2+ dependence of gating but has a large effect on the 45Ca2+-binding signal, is a worrisome anomaly. The authors correctly argue that the structure of the Ca2+ bowl may be greatly distorted in the blot assay and may not be a true reflection of Ca2+ binding in the native channel. This may explain certain inconsistencies between assays of Ca2+ activation and Ca2+ binding. Likewise, mutated residues that affect the Ca2+ dependence of voltage gating need not be located directly within a Ca2+-binding site to perturb this process. However, when taken together with the demonstration that chimeric insertion of a region containing the Ca2+ bowl confers Ca2+ sensitivity to the Slo3 Tail (Schreiber et al., 1999), the probability that all of these results are due to a coincidental allosteric effect on Ca2+ binding to a region that lies outside of the Ca2+ bowl seems rather remote.

What kind of evidence is required to finally prove the Ca2+ bowl hypothesis and unravel the molecular mechanism of Ca2+ activation of BKCa? In the short term, one line of experiments that may be helpful would be to compare the 45Ca2+-binding signal of the whole COOH-terminal cytoplasmic domain of BKCa to that of various partial fragments of this same region using the protein blot technique. Some of these partial fragments should be constructed to contain the separate and combined RCK1 and RCK2 regions homologous to the distantly related MthK K+ channel (Jiang et al., 2002). Such studies might identify particular regions of the intracellular domain of the BKCa protein that exhibit the highest levels of 45Ca2+-binding activity and thus reveal the approximate location of the various Ca2+-binding sites. However, this approach assumes that a gel-blot assay using SDS-denatured protein is capable of identifying Ca2+-binding sites that exist in the native protein.

In the longer term, it will be necessary to determine the three-dimensional structure of the BKCa channel or parts thereof, i.e., the whole intracellular domain, and/or subdomains of the intracellular domain that bind Ca2+. An ultimate goal of biochemical analysis of the BKCa channel would be to replace the 45Ca2+-blot assay with a solution-based assay for Ca2+ binding, such as equilibrium dialysis or a spectroscopic method. These are formidable tasks, given the difficulty of expressing large fragments of the BKCa channel in soluble form. However, all of the current work on the Ca2+ bowl may be virtually irrelevant if the findings of Piskorowski and Aldrich (2002) are confirmed. These latter workers reported that the normal Ca2+ and voltage dependence of gating are practically unaltered when the whole cytoplasmic COOH-terminal region is deleted from the channel protein, implying that the Ca2+-binding sites are actually located within the S0–S6 membrane domain. To settle this controversy, a tenacious scientific team needs to gear up and charge into the Ca2+ bowl, ignore the distractions of the half-time show, and prevail over the technical impediments that hinder progress on this important problem.

Acknowledgments

Work in the author's laboratory is supported by NIH grant P01NS42204 and by a Grant-in-Aid from the American Heart Association.

Olaf S. Andersen served as editor.

References

  1. Ahluwalia, J., A. Tinker, L.H. Clapp, M.R. Duchen, A.Y. Abramov, S. Pope, M. Nobles, and A.W. Segal. 2004. The large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel is essential for innate immunity. Nature. 427:853–858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  2. Bhattacharjee, A., W.J. Joiner, M. Wu, Y. Yang, F.J. Sigworth, and L.K. Kaczmarek. 2003. Slick (Slo2.1), a rapidly-gating sodium-activated potassium channel inhibited by ATP. J. Neurosci. 23:11681–11691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bian, S., I. Favre, and E. Moczydlowski. 2001. Ca2+-binding of a COOH-terminal fragment of the Drosophila BK channel involved in Ca2+-dependent activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:4776–4781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bao, L., C. Kaldany, E.C. Holmstrand, and D.H. Cox. 2004. Mapping the BKCa channel's “Ca2+ bowl”: side chains essential for Ca2+ sensing. J. Gen. Physiol. 123:475–489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bao, L., A.M. Rapin, E.C. Holmstrand, and D.H. Cox. 2002. Elimination of the BKCa channel's high-affinity Ca2+ sensitivity. J. Gen. Physiol. 120:173–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun, A.P., and L. Sy. 2001. Contribution of potential EF hand motifs to the calcium-dependent gating of a mouse brain large conductance, calcium-sensitive K+ channel. J. Physiol. 533:681–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brayden, J.E., and M.T. Nelson. 1992. Regulation of arterial tone by activation of calcium-dependent potassium channels. Science. 256:532–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cox, D.H., and R.W. Aldrich. 2000. Role of the β1 subunit in large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel gating energetics: mechanisms of enhanced Ca2+ sensitivity. J. Gen. Physiol. 116:411–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, A.G., J.T. Pierce-Shimomura, H. Kim, M.K. VanHoven, T.R. Thiele, A. Bonci, C.I. Bargmann, and S.L. McIntire. 2003. A central role of the BK potassium channel in behavioral responses to ethanol in C. elegans. Cell. 115:655–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Duncan, R.K., and P.A. Fuchs. 2003. Variation in large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels from hair cells along the chicken basilar papilla. J. Physiol. 547:357–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jiang, Y., A. Lee, J. Chen, M. Cadene, B.T. Chait, and R. MacKinnon. 2002. Crystal structure and mechanism of a calcium-gated potassium channel. Nature. 417:515–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Magleby, K.L. 2003. Gating mechanism of BK (Slo1) channels: so near, yet so far. J. Gen. Physiol. 121:81–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maruyama, K., T. Mikawa, and S. Ebashi. 1984. Detection of Ca2+-binding proteins by 45Ca autoradiography on nitrocellulose membrane after sodium dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 95:511–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Methfessel, C., and G. Boheim. 1982. The gating of single calcium-dependent potassium channels is described by and activation/blockade mechanism. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 9:35–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moczydlowski, E., and R. Latorre. 1983. Gating kinetics of Ca2+-activated K+ channels from rat muscle incorporated into planar lipid bilayers: evidence for two voltage-dependent Ca2+-binding reactions. J. Gen. Physiol. 82:511–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Piskorowski, R., and R.W. Aldrich. 2002. Calcium activation of BKCa potassium channels lacking the calcium bowl and RCK domains. Nature. 420:499–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robitaille, R., M.L. Garcia, G.J. Kaczorowski, and M.P. Charlton. 1993. Functional co-localization of calcium and calcium-gated potassium channels in control of transmitter release. Neuron. 11:645–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rothberg, B.S., and K.L. Magleby. 2000. Voltage and Ca2+-activation of single large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels described by a two-tiered allosteric gating mechanism. J. Gen. Physiol. 116:75–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schreiber, M., and L. Salkoff. 1997. A novel calcium-sensing domain in the BK channel. Biophys. J. 73:1355–1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schreiber, M., A. Wei, A. Yuan, J. Gaut, M. Saito, and L. Salkoff. 1998. Slo3, a novel pH-sensitive K+ channel from mammalian spermatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 273:3509–3516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schreiber, M., A. Yuan, and L. Salkoff. 1999. Transplantable sites confer calcium sensitivity to BK channels. Nat. Neurosci. 2:416–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shi, J., G. Krishnamoorthy, Y. Yang, L. Hu, N. Chaturvedi, D. Harilal, J. Qin, and J. Cui. 2002. Mechanism of magnesium activation of calcium-activated potassium channels. Nature. 418:876–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tang, X.D., R. Xu, M.F. Reynolds, M.L. Garcia, S.H. Heinemann, and T. Hoshi. 2003. Haem can bind to and inhibit mammalian calcium-dependent Slo1 BK channels. Nature. 425:531–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xia, X.-M., X. Zeng, and C.J. Lingle. 2002. Multiple regulatory sites in large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels. Nature. 418:880–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu, W., Y. Liu, S. Wang, T. McDonald, J.E. Van Eyk, A. Sidor, and B. O'Rourke. 2002. Cytoprotective role of Ca2+-activated K+ channels in the cardiac inner mitochondrial membrane. Science. 298:1029–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yuan, A., C.M. Santi, A. Wei, Z.-W. Wang, K. Pollak, M. Nonet, L.K. Kaczmarek, C.M. Crowder, and L. Salkoff. 2003. The sodium-activated potassium channel is encoded by a member of the Slo gene family. Neuron. 37:765–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, X., C.R. Solaro, and C.J. Lingle. 2001. Allosteric regulation of BK channel gating by Ca2+ and Mg2+ through a nonselective, low affinity divalent cation site. J. Gen. Physiol. 118:607–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES