Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1952 Jun;50(2):182–194. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400019537

A comparison of different routes of inoculation of cattle for detection of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease

W M Henderson
PMCID: PMC2235110  PMID: 14938532

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARAMBURU H. G. A comparison of different methods of inoculating guinea-pigs with the virus of foot-and-mouth disease. J Comp Pathol Ther. 1949 Jan;59(1):42–47. doi: 10.1016/s0368-1742(49)80004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HENDERSON W. M. Significance of tests for non-infectivity of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. J Hyg (Lond) 1952 Jun;50(2):195–208. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400019549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. SKINNER H. H. Propagation of strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus in unweaned white mice. Proc R Soc Med. 1951 Dec;44(12):1041–1044. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES