Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 1987 Apr;98(2):155–163. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800061860

The immunological consequences of challenge with bovine tubercle bacilli in badgers (Meles meles).

K H Mahmood, G A Rook, J L Stanford, F A Stuart, D G Pritchard
PMCID: PMC2235246  PMID: 3549341

Abstract

Optimal conditions were determined for performing antibody measurements (ELISA), lymphocyte transformation tests and, to some extent, skin tests in badgers. These parameters, together with the bacteriological and pathological studies reported previously (Pritchard et al. 1987), were used to follow the course of intradermal and intratracheal challenge of badgers with bovine tubercle bacilli. Two challenge doses were used for each route of infection and two animals received each dose. None of the four animals challenged by the intratracheal method showed any evidence of infection, suggesting that adult badgers may have some resistance to challenge by this method. All four animals challenged intradermally developed lesion of tuberculosis. Immunologically the disease passed through three phases. There was an early phase in which lymphocyte transformation to whole BCG steadily and significantly increased, and skin tests to tuberculin became positive but there was little change in antibody levels. This was followed by an intermediate phase of variable skin responses, fluctuating lymphocyte transformation and significant increase in antibody levels. The final phase, which was only seen in two animals with extensive disease, was associated with changing skin reactions and falling lymphocyte responses, together with a sudden increase in antibody levels. This paper presents the first formal evidence of cell-mediated immunity to tuberculosis in the badger, which may delay onset and prolong the survival of challenged animals.

Full text

PDF
155

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Corbel M. J., Morris J. A., Thorns C. J., Redwood D. W. Response of the badger (Meles meles) to infection with Brucella abortus. Res Vet Sci. 1983 May;34(3):296–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gallagher J., Muirhead R. H., Burn K. J. Tuberculosis in wild badgers (Meles meles) in Gloucestershire: pathology. Vet Rec. 1976 Jan 3;98(1):9–14. doi: 10.1136/vr.98.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Higgins D. A., Gatrill A. J. A comparison of the antibody responses of badgers (Meles meles) and rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) to some common antigens. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1984;75(3):219–226. doi: 10.1159/000233619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Higgins D. A. The skin inflammatory response of the badger (Meles meles). Br J Exp Pathol. 1985 Dec;66(6):643–653. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Little T. W., Naylor P. F., Wilesmith J. W. Laboratory study of Mycobacterium bovis infection in badgers and calves. Vet Rec. 1982 Dec 11;111(24):550–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mackintosh C. G., MacArthur J. A., Little T. W., Stuart P. The immobilization of the badger (Meles meles). Br Vet J. 1976 Nov-Dec;132(6):609–614. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)34537-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morris J. A., Stevens A. E., Little T. W., Stuart P. Lymphocyte unresponsiveness to PPD tuberculin in badgers infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Res Vet Sci. 1978 Nov;25(3):390–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morris J. A., Stevens A. E., Stuart P., Little T. W. A pilot study to assess the usefulness of ELISA in detecting tuberculosis in badgers. Vet Rec. 1979 Jan 6;104(1):14–14. doi: 10.1136/vr.104.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murhead R. H., Burns K. J. Tuberculosis in wild badgers in Gloucestershire: epidemiology. Vet Rec. 1974 Dec 14;95(24):552–555. doi: 10.1136/vr.95.24.552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nassau E., Parsons E. R., Johnson G. D. The detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis by microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Tubercle. 1976 Mar;57(1):67–70. doi: 10.1016/0041-3879(76)90019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Paul R. C., Stanford J. L., Carswell J. W. Multiple skin testing in leprosy. J Hyg (Lond) 1975 Aug;75(1):57–68. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400047069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pritchard D. G., Stuart F. A., Brewer J. I., Mahmood K. H. Experimental infection of badgers (Meles meles) with Mycobacterium bovis. Epidemiol Infect. 1987 Apr;98(2):145–154. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800061859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rook G. A., Champion B. R., Steele J., Varey A. M., Stanford J. L. I-A restricted activation by T cell lines of anti-tuberculosis activity in murine macrophages. Clin Exp Immunol. 1985 Feb;59(2):414–420. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stanford J. L., Nye P. M., Rook G. A., Samuel N., Fairbank A. A preliminary investigation of the responsiveness or otherwise of patients and staff of a leprosy hospital to groups of shared or species antigens of mycobacteria. Lepr Rev. 1981 Dec;52(4):321–327. doi: 10.5935/0305-7518.19810043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES