Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 2001:548–552.

Patients as experts: a collaborative performance support system.

S C Porter 1
PMCID: PMC2243331  PMID: 11825247

Abstract

Performance support systems that provide decision support and encourage quality improvement historically focus on physicians as the expert to the exclusion of an active role for patients. This paper outlines an argument for the development of a collaborative expert system in the acute care setting that emphasizes a key role for patients. Patients are not just seekers of information; they remain capable of sharing and integrating their knowledge and expertise actively in an electronically-supported care process. Collaborative use of information technology emerges as a novel variation of consumer informatics. I will define specific domains of expertise for patients and place the proposed collaborative expert system within the framework of Wagner's view of idealized collaborative care for chronic illness. Basic architecture for a patient-inclusive system is proposed with additional detail provided for a patient-level interface targeting pediatric asthma. The benefits of the electronically-supported collaboration include the activation of patients in the information-sharing process, enhanced decision support, a patient-focused needs assessment, and improved communication and partnership between patients and providers.

Full text

PDF
548

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clark N. M., Evans D., Zimmerman B. J., Levison M. J., Mellins R. B. Patient and family management of asthma: theory-based techniques for the clinician. J Asthma. 1994;31(6):427–435. doi: 10.3109/02770909409089484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crain E. F., Weiss K. B., Bijur P. E., Hersh M., Westbrook L., Stein R. E. An estimate of the prevalence of asthma and wheezing among inner-city children. Pediatrics. 1994 Sep;94(3):356–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Greenfield S., Kaplan S. H., Ware J. E., Jr, Yano E. M., Frank H. J. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;3(5):448–457. doi: 10.1007/BF02595921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenfield S., Kaplan S., Ware J. E., Jr Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Apr;102(4):520–528. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Idler E. L., Russell L. B., Davis D. Survival, functional limitations, and self-rated health in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1992. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Nov 1;152(9):874–883. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.9.874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jacobson T. A., Thomas D. M., Morton F. J., Offutt G., Shevlin J., Ray S. Use of a low-literacy patient education tool to enhance pneumococcal vaccination rates. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999 Aug 18;282(7):646–650. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.7.646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnston M. E., Langton K. B., Haynes R. B., Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):135–142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knopp R., Rosenzweig S., Bernstein E., Totten V. Physician-patient communication in the emergency department, part 1. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Nov;3(11):1065–1069. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Paterson B., Thorne S. Developmental evolution of expertise in diabetes self-management. Clin Nurs Res. 2000 Nov;9(4):402–419. doi: 10.1177/10547730022158663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Porter S. C., Mandl K. D. Data quality and the electronic medical record: a role for direct parental data entry. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:354–358. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Porter S. C., Silvia M. T., Fleisher G. R., Kohane I. S., Homer C. J., Mandl K. D. Parents as direct contributors to the medical record: validation of their electronic input. Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Apr;35(4):346–352. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schriger D. L., Baraff L. J., Rogers W. H., Cretin S. Implementation of clinical guidelines using a computer charting system. Effect on the initial care of health care workers exposed to body fluids. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1585–1590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shiffman R. N., Freudigman M. d., Brandt C. A., Liaw Y., Navedo D. D. A guideline implementation system using handheld computers for office management of asthma: effects on adherence and patient outcomes. Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):767–773. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Von Korff M., Gruman J., Schaefer J., Curry S. J., Wagner E. H. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 15;127(12):1097–1102. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-12-199712150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wagner E. H., Austin B. T., Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES