Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 2001:264–268.

A critical pathway for electronic medical record selection.

A Holbrook 1, K Keshavjee 1, K Langton 1, S Troyan 1, S Millar 1, S Olantunji 1, M Pray 1, R Tytus 1, P T Ford 1; COMPETE Study Group1
PMCID: PMC2243608  PMID: 11825192

Abstract

Electronic medical records (EMRs) are increasingly becoming a necessary tool in health care. Given their potential to influence every aspect of health care, there has been surprisingly little rigorous research applied to this important piece of emerging health technology. An initial phase of the COMPETE study, which is examining the impact of EMRs on efficiency, quality of care and privacy concerns, involved a rigorous "critical pathway" approach to EMR selection for the study. A multidisciplinary team with clinical, technical and research expertise led an 8-stage evaluation process with direct input from user physicians at each stage. An iterative sequence of review of EMR specifications and features, live product demonstrations, site visits, and negotiations with vendors led to a progressive narrowing of the field of eligible EMR systems. Final scoring was based on 3 main themes of clinical usability, data quality and support/vendor issues. We believe that a rigorous, multidisciplinary process such as this is required to maximize success of any EMR implementation project.

Full text

PDF
264

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Einbinder L. H., Remz J. B., Cochran D. Mapping clinical scenarios to functional requirements: a tool for evaluating clinical information systems. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:747–751. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goddard B. L. Termination of a contract to implement an enterprise electronic medical record system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Nov-Dec;7(6):564–568. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kahn M. G. The computer-based patient record and Robert Fulghum's 16 principles. MD Comput. 1995 Jul-Aug;12(4):253–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mitchell E., Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ. 2001 Feb 3;322(7281):279–282. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ornstein S. M. Electronic medical records in family practice: the time is now. J Fam Pract. 1997 Jan;44(1):45–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Strasberg H. R., Tudiver F., Holbrook A. M., Geiger G., Keshavjee K. K., Troyan S. Moving towards an electronic patient record: a survey to assess the needs of community family physicians. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:230–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES