Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 2000:106–110.

A Bayesian network for mammography.

E Burnside 1, D Rubin 1, R Shachter 1
PMCID: PMC2243709  PMID: 11079854

Abstract

The interpretation of a mammogram and decisions based on it involve reasoning and management of uncertainty. The wide variation of training and practice among radiologists results in significant variability in screening performance with attendant cost and efficacy consequences. We have created a Bayesian belief network to integrate the findings on a mammogram, based on the standardized lexicon developed for mammography, the Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS). Our goal in creating this network is to explore the probabilistic underpinnings of this lexicon as well as standardize mammographic decision-making to the level of expert knowledge.

Full text

PDF
106

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker J. A., Kornguth P. J., Lo J. Y., Williford M. E., Floyd C. E., Jr Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology. 1995 Sep;196(3):817–822. doi: 10.1148/radiology.196.3.7644649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beam C. A., Layde P. M., Sullivan D. C. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jan 22;156(2):209–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown M. L., Houn F., Sickles E. A., Kessler L. G. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1373–1377. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan H. P., Sahiner B., Helvie M. A., Petrick N., Roubidoux M. A., Wilson T. E., Adler D. D., Paramagul C., Newman J. S., Sanjay-Gopal S. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology. 1999 Sep;212(3):817–827. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99au47817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sewell C. W. Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995 Nov;33(6):1067–1080. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sickles E. A. Management of probably benign breast lesions. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995 Nov;33(6):1123–1130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES