Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 2002:499–503.

Improved coding of the primary reason for visit to the emergency department using SNOMED.

James C McClay 1, James Campbell 1
PMCID: PMC2244135  PMID: 12463874

Abstract

There are over 100 million visits to emergency departments in the United States annually that could be a source of data for multiple uses including disease surveillance, health services research, quality assurance activates, and research. The patients' motivations for seeking care or the reason for visit (RFV) are recorded in every case. Efforts to utilize this rich source of data are hampered by inconsistent data entry and coding. This study analyzes ICD-9-CM, SNOMED-RT, and SNOMED-CT encoding of the RFV for accuracy. Each encoded reason for visit was compared to the text entry recorded at the time of visit to determine the closeness of fit. Each coded entry was judged to be an exact lexical match, a synonym, a broader or narrower concept or no match. SNOMED-CT was a lexical match or synonym for 93% of the text entries, while SNOMED-RT matched 87%, and ICD-9-CM matched 40%. We demonstrate that SNOMED coding of the RFV is more accurate than ICD-9-CM coding.

Full text

PDF
499

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aronsky D., Kendall D., Merkley K., James B. C., Haug P. J. A comprehensive set of coded chief complaints for the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;8(10):980–989. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01098.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell J. R., Carpenter P., Sneiderman C., Cohn S., Chute C. G., Warren J. Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity. CPRI Work Group on Codes and Structures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 May-Jun;4(3):238–251. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell J. R., Payne T. H. A comparison of four schemes for codification of problem lists. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:201–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chute C. G., Cohn S. P., Campbell J. R. A framework for comprehensive health terminology systems in the United States: development guidelines, criteria for selection, and public policy implications. ANSI Healthcare Informatics Standards Board Vocabulary Working Group and the Computer-Based Patient Records Institute Working Group on Codes and Structures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Nov-Dec;5(6):503–510. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cordell W. H., Overhage J. M., Waeckerle J. F. Strategies for improving information management in emergency medicine to meet clinical, research, and administrative needs. The Information Management Work Group. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;31(2):172–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elkin P. L., Ruggieri A. P., Brown S. H., Buntrock J., Bauer B. A., Wahner-Roedler D., Litin S. C., Beinborn J., Bailey K. R., Bergstrom L. A randomized controlled trial of the accuracy of clinical record retrieval using SNOMED-RT as compared with ICD9-CM. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:159–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schriger D. L., Baraff L. J., Rogers W. H., Cretin S. Implementation of clinical guidelines using a computer charting system. Effect on the initial care of health care workers exposed to body fluids. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1585–1590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES