Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 2002:230–234.

Computerized physician order entry and communication: reciprocal impacts.

Richard Dykstra 1
PMCID: PMC2244295  PMID: 12463821

Abstract

Participant observation, focus group and oral history techniques were used to collect data from four distinctly different sites across the U.S. Data were examined initially to identify success factors for computerized physician order entry (CPOE) implementation. These data, reexamined for communication issues, revealed significant impacts on communication channels and relationships unanticipated by the implementers. Effects on physician-nurse interactions, pharmacy roles, and patient communications that vary by time and location were noted. The importance of robust bi-directional information channels between administration and staff was demonstrated to be potentially "mission-critical." The recommendation for implementers is "Plan to be surprised." Careful planning and pre-work are important but, no matter how much an institution prepares for the upheaval of CPOE, unforeseen consequences are inevitable. The presence of a prepared and capable implementation support group is essential.

Full text

PDF
230

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates D. W., Teich J. M., Lee J., Seger D., Kuperman G. J., Ma'Luf N., Boyle D., Leape L. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug;6(4):313–321. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1999.00660313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Massaro T. A. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Acad Med. 1993 Jan;68(1):20–25. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199301000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Massaro T. A. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education. Acad Med. 1993 Jan;68(1):25–30. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199301000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Payne T. H. The transition to automated practitioner order entry in a teaching hospital: the VA Puget Sound experience. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:589–593. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shojania K. G., Yokoe D., Platt R., Fiskio J., Ma'luf N., Bates D. W. Reducing vancomycin use utilizing a computer guideline: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Nov-Dec;5(6):554–562. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Teich J. M., Merchia P. R., Schmiz J. L., Kuperman G. J., Spurr C. D., Bates D. W. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 9;160(18):2741–2747. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Weir C., McCarthy C., Gohlinghorst S., Crockett R. Assessing the implementation process. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:908–912. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zimmerman M. Provider order entry: it can work! J Emerg Nurs. 1997 Oct;23(5):463–466. doi: 10.1016/s0099-1767(97)90147-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES