Abstract
We apply machine learning to the problem of subpopulation assessment for Caesarian Section. In subpopulation assessment, we are interested in making predictions not for a single patient, but for groups of patients. Typically, in any large population, different subpopulations will have different "outcome" rates. In our example, the C-section rate of a population of 22,176 expectant mothers is 16.8%; yet, the 17 physician groups that serve this population have vastly different group C-section rates, ranging from 11% to 23%. The ultimate goal of subpopulation assessment is to determine if these variations in the observed rates can be attributed to (a) variations in intrinsic risk of the patient sub-populations (i.e. some groups contain more "high-risk C-section" patients), or (b) differences in physician practice (i.e. some groups do more C-sections). Our results indicate that although there is some variation in intrinsic risk, there is also much variation in physician practice.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bailit J. L., Dooley S. L., Peaceman A. N. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):1025–1030. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00536-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poma P. A. Effects of obstetrician characteristics on cesarean delivery rates. A community hospital experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;180(6 Pt 1):1364–1372. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]