Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 2002:801–805.

Integration of a standard gastrointestinal endoscopy terminology in the UMLS Metathesaurus.

Michele Tringali 1, William T Hole 1, Suresh Srinivasan 1
PMCID: PMC2244533  PMID: 12463935

Abstract

MST(c), a standard terminology for gastrointestinal endoscopy reporting, was integrated in the January 2002 UMLS Metathesaurus in order to ease the practical interoperability of clinical data repositories in gastroenterology. The integration required full specification of names, resolution of discrepancies between English, French and Italian versions of MST, appropriate categorization with UMLS Semantic Types and MST-level Class attributes, assignment of explicit intra-table (and some useful inter-table) relationships mainly at concept level but also at the source level in order to retain and fully represent the original explicit and implicit MST organization. Main results, problems encountered and future plans are discussed.

Full text

PDF
801

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cimino J. J. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods Inf Med. 1998 Nov;37(4-5):394–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delvaux M., Crespi M., Armengol-Miro J. R., Hagenmüller F., Teuffel W., Spencer K. B., Stettin J., Zwiebel F. M. Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project. Endoscopy. 2000 Apr;32(4):345–355. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-7384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Korman L. Y., Bidgood W. D., Jr Representation of the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Minimal Standard Terminology in the SNOMED DICOM microglossary. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:434–438. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Logan J. R., Klopfer K. C. The use of a standardized terminology for comparison of free text and structured data entry. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:512–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McCray A. T., Bodenreider O., Malley J. D., Browne A. C. Evaluating UMLS strings for natural language processing. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:448–452. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mejino J. L., Jr, Rosse C. The potential of the digital anatomist foundational model for assuring consistency in UMLS sources. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:825–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rector A. L. Clinical terminology: why is it so hard? Methods Inf Med. 1999 Dec;38(4-5):239–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES