Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1988 Nov 9:212–217.

A Feature Dictionary for a Multi-Domain Medical Knowledge Base

Frank Naeymi-Rad
PMCID: PMC2245233

Abstract

Because different terminology is used by physicians of different specialties in different locations to refer to the same feature (signs, symptoms, test results), it is essential that our knowledge development tools provide a means to access a common pool of terms. This paper discusses the design of an online medical dictionary that provides a solution to this problem for developers of multi-domain knowledge bases for MEDAS (Medical Emergency Decision Assistance System). This Feature Dictionary supports phrase equivalents for features, feature interactions, feature classifications, and translations to the binary features generated by the expert during knowledge creation. It is also used in the conversion of a domain knowledge to the database used by the MEDAS inference diagnostic sessions. The Feature Dictionary also provides capabilities for complex queries across multiple domains using the supported relations. The Feature Dictionary supports three methods for feature representation: 1) binary, 2) continuous valued, and 3) derived.

Full text

PDF
212

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beebe G. W. Record linkage systems--Canada vs the United States. Am J Public Health. 1980 Dec;70(12):1246–1248. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.12.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gittelsohn A., Senning J. Studies on the reliability of vital and health records: I. Comparison of cause of death and hospital record diagnoses. Am J Public Health. 1979 Jul;69(7):680–689. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.7.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Horwitz R. I. Comparison of epidemiologic data from multiple sources. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):889–896. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Newcombe H. B. The use of medical record linkage for population and genetic studies. Methods Inf Med. 1969 Jan;8(1):7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roos L. L., Jr, Wajda A., Nicol J. P. The art and science of record linkage: methods that work with few identifiers. Comput Biol Med. 1986;16(1):45–57. doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(86)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rose G., Barker D. J. Prognosis and outcome. Br Med J. 1978 Nov 11;2(6148):1355–1356. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6148.1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES