Abstract
Blood collection facilities have recently witnessed a substantial increase in the number of different tests used to detect infectious disease in donor populations. These facilities are also experiencing an increasingly stringent regulatory effort on the part of the Food and Drug Administration to determine the validity of the software used to handle this information. This report describes a precedence-based inference program (PRELOG) and a modular expert system used to determine a donor's suitability for continued donations (donor deferrals), and whether the donated unit can be released for transfusion. PRELOG accepts ternary logic input, in which test results are allowed to be positive, negative, or undetermined; and allows one to assign precedence values to the logic rules. These features enable programs to be written in a shorter, more error-resistant manner. A comparison between PRELOG and PROLOG is included, and the utility of this approach in producing and validating blood bank software is discussed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Duda R. O., Shortliffe E. H. Expert Systems Research. Science. 1983 Apr 15;220(4594):261–268. doi: 10.1126/science.6340198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LEDLEY R. S., LUSTED L. B. Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason. Science. 1959 Jul 3;130(3366):9–21. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3366.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore G. W., Hutchins G. M. Consistency versus completeness in medical decision-making: exemplar of 155 patients autopsied after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Med Inform (Lond) 1983 Jul-Sep;8(3):197–207. doi: 10.3109/14639238309016083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore G. W., Hutchins G. M. Symbolic logic analysis of cause of death in humans: application to 108 patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Theor Biol. 1981 Oct 7;92(3):267–291. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(81)90292-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]