Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1989 Mar;59(3):441–444. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.90

Prognostic factors in a T3 bladder cancer trial. Co-operative Urological Cancer Group.

A Babiker 1, R J Shearer 1, C E Chilvers 1
PMCID: PMC2247062  PMID: 2930712

Abstract

Information on primary tumour size, status of the pelvic lymph nodes, histological type and macroscopic tumour appearance, as well as age and sex, was available at presentation for 394 patients in the Co-operative Urological Cancer Group's prospective randomised trial for T3 cancer of the urinary bladder. An apparently significant prognostic effect of age and sex was shown to be entirely consistent with the effect of natural mortality. Primary tumour size was found to be the single most powerful prognostic factor (P = 0.002), followed by nodal status (P = 0.02). These factors do not act independently. Multivariate analysis showed that 75% of the effect of all the six variables and their first order interactions could be explained by a single prognostic grouping based on tumour size and nodal status only. Three levels for this grouping are proposed: node-negative small tumour, node-negative moderate tumour and either node-positive or large tumour. The 3-year survival probabilities for the three prognostic groups were 85.7% (95% CI 57.2 and 96.4%), 60.3% (48.0 and 71.5%) and 33.3% (23.5 and 44.8%) respectively.

Full text

PDF
441

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blandy J. P., England H. R., Evans S. J., Hope-Stone H. F., Mair G. M., Mantell B. S., Oliver R. T., Paris A. M., Risdon R. A. T3 bladder cancer--the case for salvage cystectomy. Br J Urol. 1980 Dec;52(6):506–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1980.tb03101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloom H. J., Hendry W. F., Wallace D. M., Skeet R. G. Treatment of T3 bladder cancer: controlled trial of pre-operative radiotherapy and radical cystectomy versus radical radiotherapy. Br J Urol. 1982 Apr;54(2):136–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1982.tb13537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heney N. M., Proppe K., Prout G. R., Jr, Griffin P. P., Shipley W. U. Invasive bladder cancer: tumor configuration, lymphatic invasion and survival. J Urol. 1983 Nov;130(5):895–897. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)51558-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Narayana A. S., Loening S. A., Slymen D. J., Culp D. A. Bladder cancer: factors affecting survival. J Urol. 1983 Jul;130(1):56–60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50952-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pryor J. P. Factors influencing the survival of patients with transitional cell tumours of the urinary bladder. Br J Urol. 1973 Dec;45(6):586–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1973.tb12227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shearer R. J., Chilvers C. F., Bloom H. J., Bliss J. M., Horwich A., Babiker A. Adjuvant chemotherapy in T3 carcinoma of the bladder. A prospective trial: preliminary report. Br J Urol. 1988 Dec;62(6):558–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb04426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Slack N. H., Prout G. R., Jr The heterogeneity of invasive bladder carcinoma and different responses to treatment. J Urol. 1980 May;123(5):644–652. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith J. A., Jr, Whitmore W. F., Jr Regional lymph node metastasis from bladder cancer. J Urol. 1981 Nov;126(5):591–593. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54638-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES