Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1989 Apr;59(4):584–590. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.118

Controlled trial of twelve versus six courses of chemotherapy in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Report to the Medical Research Council by its Lung Cancer Working Party.

PMCID: PMC2247128  PMID: 2540789

Abstract

A total of 497 patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer were prescribed initial treatment with six courses of etoposide, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and vincristine at 3-week intervals. Patients with limited disease (74% of the total) also received radiotherapy (40 Gy in 15 fractions in 3 weeks) to the primary site between courses 2 and 3. At the end of this initial treatment, 265 patients still in complete or partial response were randomly allocated to six further courses of maintenance chemotherapy (M series: 131 patients) or to no maintenance chemotherapy (NoM series: 134 patients). Response, as assessed 3 weeks after the second course of initial chemotherapy, was achieved in 85% of the 264 patients assessed, a complete response in 11%. The median survival period from the date of start of chemotherapy was 39 weeks; 154 (31%) of the patients were alive at 1 year, 29 (6%) at 2 years and 17 (3%) at 3 years. The patients' general condition and extent of disease pretreatment correlated significantly with survival. Among the 131 M and 134 NoM patients there was no overall survival advantage to either series (P = 0.27, log rank test), although in 99 patients who had a complete response to initial chemotherapy as assessed at the time of randomisation there was a suggestion that survival was longer in the M series (P less than 0.05, log rank test), the median survival periods from the date of randomisation being 42 weeks for the M and 30 weeks for the NoM patients. Maintenance chemotherapy was associated with additional toxicity and a poorer quality of life as assessed intermittently by clinicians and daily by patients. In conclusion, no worthwhile clinical advantage was achieved by the policy of continuing chemotherapy beyond six courses, except possibly in patients with a complete response to the initial six courses.

Full text

PDF
584

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cullen M., Morgan D., Gregory W., Robinson M., Cox D., McGivern D., Ward M., Richards M., Stableforth D., Macfarlane A. Maintenance chemotherapy for anaplastic small cell carcinoma of the bronchus: a randomised, controlled trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1986;17(2):157–160. doi: 10.1007/BF00306746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fayers P. M., Jones D. R. Measuring and analysing quality of life in cancer clinical trials: a review. Stat Med. 1983 Oct-Dec;2(4):429–446. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780020402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Feld R., Evans W. K., DeBoer G., Quirt I. C., Shepherd F. A., Yeoh J. L., Pringle J. F., Payne D. G., Herman J. G., Chamberlain D. Combined modality induction therapy without maintenance chemotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol. 1984 Apr;2(4):294–304. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.4.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Feld R., Pringle J. F., Evans W. K., Keen C. W., Quirt I. C., Curtis J. E., Baker M. A., Yeoh J. L., Deboer G., Brown T. C. Combined modality treatment of small cell carcinoma of the lung. Arch Intern Med. 1981 Mar;141(4):469–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greco F. A., Johnson D. H., Hainsworth J. D., Wolff S. N. Chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 1985 Dec;12(4 Suppl 6):31–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Simon R. Patient subsets and variation in therapeutic efficacy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 Oct;14(4):473–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb02015.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES