Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1989 Apr;59(4):510–514. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.105

Size-dependent resistance of human tumour spheroids to photodynamic treatment.

C M West 1
PMCID: PMC2247149  PMID: 2523722

Abstract

Spheroids derived from the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line, WiDr, were exposed to 10 micrograms ml-1 Photofrin II and irradiated with light (700 nm, 50 mW cm-2). Compared with exponentially growing monolayer cultures, cells in spheroids of 100, 250 and 500 microns diameter were respectively 1.8, 2.5 and 22-fold less sensitive. The small resistance of plateau-phase cultures (1.3-fold) was insufficient to account for this marked spheroid size-dependent resistance. For monolayer cultures and for spheroids of 100 and 250 microns diameter, the results were the same whether irradiations were carried out pre- or post-trypsinisation. However, there was a difference for the largest spheroid size: when irradiations were carried out pre-trypsinisation, spheroids were more resistant than when irradiations were given post-trypsinisation. Drug extraction studies showed that there was no difference in the average drug uptake between cultures of exponentially growing or plateau-phase cells, and 100 microns diameter spheroids while 250 and 500 microns diameter spheroids took up proportionally 0.5 and 0.4 as much drug. Cell contact effects, drug heterogeneity between cells, hypoxia and problems in drug penetration are suggested as possible reasons for the resistance of large spheroids to photodynamic treatment.

Full text

PDF
510

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barel A., Jori G., Perin A., Romandini P., Pagnan A., Biffanti S. Role of high-, low- and very low-density lipoproteins in the transport and tumor-delivery of hematoporphyrin in vivo. Cancer Lett. 1986 Aug;32(2):145–150. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(86)90112-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-Hur E., Green M., Prager A., Kol R., Rosenthal I. Phthalocyanine photosensitization of mammalian cells: biochemical and ultrastructural effects. Photochem Photobiol. 1987 Nov;46(5):651–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1987.tb04827.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christensen T., Feren K., Moan J., Pettersen E. Photodynamic effects of haematoporphyrin derivative on synchronized and asynchronous cells of different origin. Br J Cancer. 1981 Nov;44(5):717–724. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1981.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dertinger H., Hinz G., Jakobs K. H. Intercellular communication, three-dimensional cell contact and radiosensitivity. Biophys Struct Mech. 1982;9(2):89–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00539106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durand R. E. Flow cytometry studies of intracellular adriamycin in multicell spheroids in vitro. Cancer Res. 1981 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):3495–3498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Durand R. E., Sutherland R. M. Effects of intercellular contact on repair of radiation damage. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Mar;71(1):75–80. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Durand R. E. Variable radiobiological responses of spheroids. Radiat Res. 1980 Jan;81(1):85–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dutreix J., Tubiana M., Dutreix A. An approach to the interpretation of clinical data on the tumour control probability-dose relationship. Radiother Oncol. 1988 Mar;11(3):239–248. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(88)90006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eichler J., Knof J., Lenz H. Measurements on the depth of penetration of light (0.35--1.0 microgram) in tissue. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1977 Oct 12;14(3):239–242. doi: 10.1007/BF01323942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Franko A. J., Koch C. J. The radiation response of hypoxic cells in EMT6 spheroids in suspension culture does model data from EMT6 tumors. Radiat Res. 1983 Dec;96(3):497–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilbert C. W. Computer programmes for fitting Puck and probit survival curves. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1969;16(4):323–332. doi: 10.1080/09553006914551351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gomer C. J., Smith D. M. Photoinactivation of Chinese hamster cells by hematoporphyrin derivative and red light. Photochem Photobiol. 1980 Sep;32(3):341–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1980.tb03772.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hahn G. M., Little J. B. Plateau-phase cultures of mammalian cells: an in vitro model for human cancer. Curr Top Radiat Res Q. 1972 Jul;8(1):39–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moan J., Sommer S. Oxygen dependence of the photosensitizing effect of hematoporphyrin derivative in NHIK 3025 cells. Cancer Res. 1985 Apr;45(4):1608–1610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moore J. V., Keene J. P., Land E. J. Dose-response relationships for photodynamic injury to murine skin. Br J Radiol. 1986 Mar;59(699):257–261. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-59-699-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pantelides M. L., Moore J. V., Blacklock N. J. A comparison of serum kinetics and tissue distribution of photofrin II following intravenous and intraperitoneal injection in the mouse. Photochem Photobiol. 1989 Jan;49(1):67–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb04079.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sutherland R. M., Eddy H. A., Bareham B., Reich K., Vanantwerp D. Resistance to adriamycin in multicellular spheroids. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979 Aug;5(8):1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(79)90643-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sutherland R. M., Inch W. R., McCredie J. A., Kruuv J. A multi-component radiation survival curve using an in vitro tumour model. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1970;18(5):491–495. doi: 10.1080/09553007014551401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. West C. M., Keng P. C., Sutherland R. M. Growth phase related variation in the radiation sensitivity of human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 Jun;14(6):1213–1219. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90400-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. West C. M., Moore J. V. The photodynamic effects of photofrin II, hematoporphyrin derivative, hematoporphyrin, and tetrasodium-mesotetra(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphine in vitro: clonogenic cell survival and drug uptake studies. Photochem Photobiol. 1989 Feb;49(2):169–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb04092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. West C. M., Sandhu R. R., Stratford I. J. The radiation response of V79 and human tumour multicellular spheroids--cell survival and growth delay studies. Br J Cancer. 1984 Aug;50(2):143–151. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1984.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. West C. M., Stratford I. J. A comparison of adriamycin and mAMSA. II. Studies with V79 and human tumour multicellular spheroids. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1987;20(2):109–114. doi: 10.1007/BF00253963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. West C. M., Sutherland R. M. The radiation response of a human colon adenocarcinoma grown in monolayer, as spheroids, and in nude mice. Radiat Res. 1987 Oct;112(1):105–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES