Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1991:94–98.

The design and automated testing of an expert system for the differential diagnosis of acute stroke.

R A Wain 1, S Tuhrim 1, L D'Autrechy 1, J A Reggia 1
PMCID: PMC2247502  PMID: 1807759

Abstract

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and a major source of morbidity. [1] Recent studies have shown a potential use for thrombolytic agents in the treatment of ischemic stroke (IS) but these agents are contraindicated in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A computed tomographic scan is used to distinguish between these two stroke types prior to the use of thrombolytic agents, but may not be readily obtainable. Decision making aids such as algorithms developed at Guy's Hospital and Strong Memorial Hospital have been designed in an attempt to make this distinction on clinical grounds. We have constructed computerized medical decision-making (CMD) systems based upon these algorithms and compared their performance to a system we developed with the use of National Stroke Data Bank data. Relevant medical data for each of 337 patient cases in the Mount Sinai Hospital Stroke Data Bank were presented to each of the CMD systems. In consideration of the clinical task of using thrombolytic agents, we attempted to maximize the positive predictive value (PPV) for ischemic stroke. The CMD systems based upon the Guy's Hospital and Mount Sinai algorithms produced PPV's of 95% and 94% with sensitivities of 77% and 78% respectively compared to a PPV of 93% and sensitivity of 56% with the Strong Memorial CMD system. The Mount Sinai CMD system was judged more efficacious than the Guy's Hospital system in that it required less clinical information that could be more easily obtained to arrive at similar results.

Full text

PDF
94

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARING C. D. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CEREBROVASCULAR STROKE. Arch Intern Med. 1964 Feb;113:195–199. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1964.00280080031007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harrison M. J. Clinical distinction of cerebral haemorrhage and cerebral infarction. Postgrad Med J. 1980 Sep;56(659):629–632. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.56.659.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller R. A., Pople H. E., Jr, Myers J. D. Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 19;307(8):468–476. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198208193070803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Miller R. A., Schaffner K. F., Meisel A. Ethical and legal issues related to the use of computer programs in clinical medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Apr;102(4):529–537. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Panzer R. J., Feibel J. H., Barker W. H., Griner P. F. Predicting the likelihood of hemorrhage in patients with stroke. Arch Intern Med. 1985 Oct;145(10):1800–1803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tuhrim S., Yang W. C., Rubinowitz H., Weinberger J. Primary pontine hemorrhage and the dysarthria-clumsy hand syndrome. Neurology. 1982 Sep;32(9):1027–1028. doi: 10.1212/wnl.32.9.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES