Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1991:1000–1004.

Ranking radiotherapy treatment plans using decision-analytic and heuristic techniques.

N L Jain 1, M G Kahn 1
PMCID: PMC2247705  PMID: 1807562

Abstract

Radiotherapy treatment optimization is done by generating a set of tentative treatment plans, evaluating them and selecting the plan closest to achieving a set of conflicting treatment objectives. The evaluation of potential plans involves making tradeoffs among competing possible outcomes. Multiattribute decision theory provides a framework for specifying such tradeoffs and using them to select optimal actions. Using these concepts, we have developed a plan-ranking model which ranks a set of tentative treatment plans from best to worst. Heuristics are used to refine this model so that it reflects the clinical condition of the patient being treated and the practice preferences of the physician prescribing the treatment. A figure of merit is computed for each tentative plan, and is used to rank the plans. The approach described is very general and can be used for other medical domains having similar characteristics. The figure of merit can also be used as an objective function by computer programs that attempt to automatically generate an optimal treatment plan.

Full text

PDF
1000

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Goitein M., Schultheiss T. E. Strategies for treating possible tumor extension: some theoretical considerations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Aug;11(8):1519–1528. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90341-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gorry G. A., Kassirer J. P., Essig A., Schwartz W. B. Decision analysis as the basis for computer-aided management of acute renal failure. Am J Med. 1973 Oct;55(3):473–484. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(73)90204-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kutcher G. J., Burman C. Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Jun;16(6):1623–1630. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90972-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lyman J. T., Wolbarst A. B. Optimization of radiation therapy, III: A method of assessing complication probabilities from dose-volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987 Jan;13(1):103–109. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(87)90266-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schultheiss T. E., Orton C. G. Models in radiotherapy: definition of decision criteria. Med Phys. 1985 Mar-Apr;12(2):183–187. doi: 10.1118/1.595707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES