Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and cost of 11 online MEDLINE systems with MEDLINE at Elhill. DESIGN: Comparative study. SYSTEMS: Eleven online daytime systems commercially available in North America offering the MEDLINE database. MEASURES: Number of relevant citations, number of irrelevant citations, proportion of searches producing no relevant citations and cost per relevant citation were analyzed for each system. Relevance and cost for each system were compared with direct searching of MEDLINE through NLM for librarian and clinician search strategies for 18 clinical questions. The citations retrieved by both strategies were pooled and rated for relevance on a 7-point scale. RESULTS: Numbers of relevant and irrelevant citations and cost per relevant citation were higher for clinician searches than librarian searches, reflecting the higher total number of citations retrieved by the clinician approaches. A lower proportion of clinician searches produced no relevant citations than librarian searches. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven daytime MEDLINE systems performed similarly in terms of retrieval and cost within similar searching groups. Clinicians, however, tended to capture larger overall retrievals resulting in higher numbers of relevant and irrelevant citations than librarians.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Mousseau J., Baker L. M., Fitzgerald D., Guyatt G., Norman G. R. Computer searching of the medical literature. An evaluation of MEDLINE searching systems. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Nov;103(5):812–816. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-5-812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hewison N. S. Evaluating CD-ROM versions of the MEDLINE database: a checklist. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Oct;77(4):332–336. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan P., Winand D., Bleich H. L., Slack W. V., Porter D. Computer searching of the medical literature. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Jan;106(1):168–169. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-1-168_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallingford K. T., Humphreys B. L., Selinger N. E., Siegel E. R. Bibliographic retrieval: a survey of individual users of MEDLINE. MD Comput. 1990 May-Jun;7(3):166–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]