Abstract
We examined whether voice-activated word processors provide an acceptable means for emergency physicians to create medical records. Our study addressed three areas of inquiry: whether physicians can be induced to try this new technology, whether they will continue to use it after outside technical support is withdrawn, and the factors contributing to adoption and substantial use of voice-activated computers by practicing emergency physicians. This paper presents findings from the first half of the study, reflecting physicians' reported experiences while receiving onsite training followed by technical support for three months after system installation. Based on preliminary assessments, the keys to successful use appear to include physician and group commitment, acceptance of a steep learning curve, and flexibility in adapting the computer software and/or practice habits.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dunn J. D. Risk management in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1987 Feb;5(1):51–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holbrook J. A computerized audit of 15,009 emergency department records. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Feb;19(2):139–144. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81798-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lesser M. F. Computerized records in clinical cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Oct;8(4):941–948. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80439-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Safran C., Rury C., Rind D. M., Taylor W. C. Outpatient medical records for a teaching hospital: beginning the physician-computer dialogue. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:114–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young D. W. Can we get doctors to use computers? Health Serv Manage. 1991 Jun;87(3):116–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]