Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1992:405–409.

Expert nurses' clinical reasoning under uncertainty: representation, structure, and process.

M E Fonteyn 1, S J Grobe 1
PMCID: PMC2248085  PMID: 1482907

Abstract

How do expert nurses reason when planning care and making clinical decisions for a patient who is at risk, and whose outcome is uncertain? In this study, a case study involving a critically ill elderly woman whose condition deteriorated over time, was presented in segments to ten expert critical care nurses. Think aloud method was used to elicit knowledge from these experts to provide conceptual information about their knowledge and to reveal their reasoning processes and problem-solving strategies. The verbatim transcripts were then analyzed using a systematic three-step method that makes analysis easier and adds creditability to study findings by providing a means of retracing and explaining analysis results. Findings revealed information about how patient problems were represented during reasoning, the manner in which experts subjects structured their plan of care, and the reasoning processes and heuristics they used to formulate solutions for resolving the patient's problems and preventing deterioration in the patient's condition.

Full text

PDF
405

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benner P., Tanner C., Chesla C. From beginner to expert: gaining a differentiated clinical world in critical care nursing. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1992 Mar;14(3):13–28. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199203000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benner P., Tanner C. Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition. Am J Nurs. 1987 Jan;87(1):23–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruya M. A., Demand J. K. Nursing decision making in critical care: traditional versus invasive blood pressure monitoring. Nurs Adm Q. 1985 Summer;9(4):19–31. doi: 10.1097/00006216-198500940-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corcoran S. A. Planning by expert and novice nurses in cases of varying complexity. Res Nurs Health. 1986 Jun;9(2):155–162. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770090211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Corcoran S., Narayan S., Moreland H. "Thinking aloud" as a strategy to improve clinical decision making. Heart Lung. 1988 Sep;17(5):463–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grobe S. J., Drew J. A., Fonteyn M. E. A descriptive analysis of experienced nurses' clinical reasoning during a planning task. Res Nurs Health. 1991 Aug;14(4):305–314. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770140409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Joseph G. M., Patel V. L. Domain knowledge and hypothesis generation in diagnostic reasoning. Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):31–46. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kassirer J. P., Gorry G. A. Clinical problem solving: a behavioral analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1978 Aug;89(2):245–255. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-89-2-245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MILLER G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Putzier D. J., Padrick K., Westfall U. E., Tanner C. A. Diagnostic reasoning in critical care nursing. Heart Lung. 1985 Sep;14(5):430–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES