Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1992:8–12.

Physician use of an NICU laboratory reporting system.

D P Connelly 1, G R Werth 1, D W Dean 1, B K Hultman 1, T R Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC2248125  PMID: 1482988

Abstract

Clinical workstation developers may gain useful insights from studies of physician acceptance and use of computer systems that have been incorporated into daily practice. We used a physician survey, intrinsic monitors built into the system and an observational study to assess physician acceptance and use of a touchscreen workstation that was put in place in an NICU in 1985. Each of the 87 physicians assigned to the 30 bed NICU during the two academic years beginning July, 1987 was sent a questionnaire that assessed experience and attitudes about the system. The 70 responding physicians (80 percent) were unanimous in agreeing or strongly agreeing that the system was "easy to learn" (57 reported it taking less than five minutes), "easy to use", and "integrates smoothly into patient care activities". Over 94 percent of the physicians agreed or strongly agreed that the system was "fast", "saves time", and was "reliable and dependable." Sixty-three of the responding physicians (90%) reported using the system two or more times a day with 53 using it more than five times daily. The most frequently requested new feature was that of time-trend graphs (51 occurrences). The intrinsic monitors were useful in validating design decisions and survey results but also provided new insights relevant to security issues. Similarly, the observation study reinforced some of the survey results but also highlighted an additional issue not brought out by the other two assessment methods. The overall assessment indicated that the system has been both well-accepted and well-used by its intended clinical clientele.

Full text

PDF
8

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. G., Jay S. J., Schweer H. M., Anderson M. M. Why doctors don't use computers: some empirical findings. J R Soc Med. 1986 Mar;79(3):142–144. doi: 10.1177/014107688607900305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Melhorn J. M., Legler W. K., Clark G. M. Current attitudes of medical personnel toward computers. Comput Biomed Res. 1979 Aug;12(4):327–334. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(79)90044-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schroeder C. G., Pierpaoli P. G. Direct order entry by physicians in a computerized hospital information system. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Feb;43(2):355–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shortliffe E. H. Developing trends in clinical computing. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1991 Mar;20(2):277–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Singer J., Sacks H. S., Lucente F., Chalmers T. C. Physician attitudes toward applications of computer data base systems. JAMA. 1983 Mar 25;249(12):1610–1614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Startsman T. S., Robinson R. E. The attitudes of medical and paramedical personnel toward computers. Comput Biomed Res. 1972 Jun;5(3):218–227. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(72)90083-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Teach R. L., Shortliffe E. H. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. Comput Biomed Res. 1981 Dec;14(6):542–558. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(81)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Young D. W. Doctors' attitudes to a computer-based clinical information system. Methods Inf Med. 1981 Oct;20(4):196–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES