Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1968 Aug;60(4):1304–1311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.4.1304

Generation of slow postsynaptic potentials without increases in ionic conductance.

H Kobayashi, B Libet
PMCID: PMC224918  PMID: 4299944

Full text

PDF
1304

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett M. V., Grundfest H. Analysis of depolarizing and hyperpolarizing inactivation responses in gymnotid electroplaques. J Gen Physiol. 1966 Sep;50(1):141–169. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CURTIS D. R., RYALL R. W. NICOTINIC AND MUSCARINIC RECEPTORS OF RENSHAW CELLS. Nature. 1964 Aug 8;203:652–653. doi: 10.1038/203652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ECCLES R. M., LIBET B. Origin and blockade of the synaptic responses of curarized sympathetic ganglia. J Physiol. 1961 Aug;157:484–503. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ECCLES R. Action potentials of isolated mammalian sympathetic ganglia. J Physiol. 1952 Jun;117(2):181–195. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hunt C. C., Riker W. K. Properties of frog sympathetic neurons in normal ganglia and after axon section. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Nov;29(6):1096–1114. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.6.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kandel E. R., Tauc L. Anomalous rectification in the metacerebral giant cells and its consequences for synaptic transmission. J Physiol. 1966 Mar;183(2):287–304. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koketsu K., Nishi S. Characteristics of the slow inhibitory postsynaptic potential of bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells. Life Sci. 1967 Sep 1;6(17):1827–1836. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(67)90211-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krnjević K., Phillis J. W. Pharmacological properties of acetylcholine-sensitive cells in the cerebral cortex. J Physiol. 1963 May;166(2):328–350. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Krnjević K., Schwartz S. Some properties of unresponsive cells in the cerebral cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1967;3(4):306–319. doi: 10.1007/BF00237557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LUNDBERG A. Electrophysiology of salivary glands. Physiol Rev. 1958 Jan;38(1):21–40. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1958.38.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Libet B., Chichibu S., Tosaka T. Slow synaptic responses and excitability in sympathetic ganglia of the bullfrog. J Neurophysiol. 1968 May;31(3):383–395. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.3.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Libet B. Long latent periods and further analysis of slow synaptic responses in sympathetic ganglia. J Neurophysiol. 1967 May;30(3):494–514. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.3.494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakajima S., Takahashi K. Post-tetanic hyperpolarization and electrogenic Na pump in stretch receptor neurone of crayfish. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(1):105–127. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nelson P. G., Frank K. Anomalous rectification in cat spinal motoneurons and effect of polarizing currents on excitatory postsynaptic potential. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1097–1113. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nishi S., Koketsu K. Origin of ganglionic inhibitory postsynaptic potential. Life Sci. 1967 Oct 1;6(19):2049–2055. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(67)90223-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Phillis J. W., York D. H. An intracortical cholinergic inhibitory synapse. Life Sci. 1968 Jan 1;7(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(68)90362-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SKOU J. C. ENZYMATIC BASIS FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORT OF NA+ AND K+ ACROSS CELL MEMBRANE. Physiol Rev. 1965 Jul;45:596–617. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1965.45.3.596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith T. G., Wuerker R. B., Frank K. Membrane impedance changes during synaptic transmission in cat spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1072–1096. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. TAKESHIGE C., VOLLE R. L. A COMPARISON OF THE GANGLION POTENTIALS AND BLOCK PRODUCED BY ACETYLCHOLINE AND TETRAMETHYLAMMONIUM. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1964 Aug;23:80–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1964.tb01568.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tosaka T., Chichibu S., Libet B. Intracellular analysis of slow inhibitors and excitatory postsynaptic potentials in sympathetic ganglia of the frog. J Neurophysiol. 1968 May;31(3):396–409. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.3.396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES