Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 1988 Feb;100(1):17–25. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800065511

The extent of surface contamination of retailed chickens with Campylobacter jejuni serogroups.

A M Hood 1, A D Pearson 1, M Shahamat 1
PMCID: PMC2249201  PMID: 3338503

Abstract

Eighty-two chickens purchased at 11 retailers (supplied by 12 wholesalers) in the south of England were cultured for Campylobacter jejuni by a method involving total immersion. The organism was isolated from 22 (48%) of 46 fresh birds, 12 of 12 uneviscerated (New York dressed) birds, but only 1 of 24 frozen birds. Viable counts of up to 1.5 x 10(6)/chicken were obtained from fresh birds and 2.4 x 10(7)/chicken from uneviscerated birds. Surface swabbing of breasts, thighs, wings and vents of fresh chickens showed that contamination was generally distributed over the carcasses. Salmonellas were found in only 2 of 69 of the fresh chickens. The prevalence of several Lior and Penner C. jejuni serogroups was similar in chickens and sporadic human cases of enteritis. Penner serogroup 4 (mostly of Lior serogroup 1) was found in 26% of human isolates and 14% of chicken isolates. The rising incidence of campylobacter enteritis during the last 6 years could well be a reflection of the increasing proportion of fresh chickens consumed over that period (32% higher in 1986 than in 1981).

Full text

PDF
17

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jones D. M., Abbott J. D., Painter M. J., Sutcliffe E. M. A comparison of biotypes and serotypes of Campylobacter sp. isolated from patients with enteritis and from animal and environmental sources. J Infect. 1984 Jul;9(1):51–58. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(84)94498-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jones D. M., Sutcliffe E. M., Abbott J. D. Serotyping of Campylobacter species by combined use of two methods. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;4(6):562–565. doi: 10.1007/BF02013395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lior H., Woodward D. L., Edgar J. A., Laroche L. J., Gill P. Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by slide agglutination based on heat-labile antigenic factors. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):761–768. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.761-768.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Munroe D. L., Prescott J. F., Penner J. L. Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli serotypes isolated from chickens, cattle, and pigs. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):877–881. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.877-881.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Park C. E., Stankiewicz Z. K., Lovett J., Hunt J. Incidence of Campylobacter jejuni in fresh eviscerated whole market chickens. Can J Microbiol. 1981 Aug;27(8):841–842. doi: 10.1139/m81-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Patton C. M., Barrett T. J., Morris G. K. Comparison of the Penner and Lior methods for serotyping Campylobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Oct;22(4):558–565. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.4.558-565.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Penner J. L., Hennessy J. N. Passive hemagglutination technique for serotyping Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni on the basis of soluble heat-stable antigens. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Dec;12(6):732–737. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.6.732-737.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Robinson D. A. Infective dose of Campylobacter jejuni in milk. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 May 16;282(6276):1584–1584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6276.1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Skirrow M. B. Campylobacter enteritis: a "new" disease. Br Med J. 1977 Jul 2;2(6078):9–11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6078.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith M. V., 2nd, Muldoon P. J. Campylobacter fetus subspecies jejuni (Vibrio fetus) from commercially processed poultry. Appl Microbiol. 1974 May;27(5):995–996. doi: 10.1128/am.27.5.995-996.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES