Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 1988 Dec;101(3):685–694. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800029563

Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. 2. Comparison of methods for the direct detection of specific antigen or nucleic acid sequences in respiratory exudates.

R Harris 1, B P Marmion 1, G Varkanis 1, T Kok 1, B Lunn 1, J Martin 1
PMCID: PMC2249409  PMID: 3145892

Abstract

The efficiency of the direct detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory exudates by an antigen capture, indirect enzyme immunoassay (Ag-EIA), has been compared with its detection with a cDNA probe ('Gen-Probe assay') directed against the specific ribosomal RNA sequences of the organism ('Mycoplasma pneumoniae Rapid Diagnostic System', Gen-Probe, San Diego, California). Both assays showed excellent specificity against a range of mycoplasma species suspended in negative nasopharyngeal aspirates; only M. pneumoniae and M. genitalium reacted. In experiments with graded doses of viable M. pneumoniae cells suspended in negative nasopharyngeal aspirate, the Gen-Probe assay was more sensitive than Ag-EIA; detection limits were respectively 2 X 10(3) c.f.u./ml (3.2 X 10(5) genomes) and 2.5 X 10(4) c.f.u./ml (4 X 10(6) genomes); detection levels 10-100 times less sensitive than culture. The two assays were also tested on nasopharyngeal aspirates or sputum specimens from 90 patients with respiratory infection; 67 of these were culture- or seronegative for M. pneumoniae and 23 were culture- or seropositive. Ag-EIA detected 21 (91%) of the latter but the Gen-Probe assay detected only 5 (22%). Both assays were negative with the 67 culture-/sero-negatives; there were no Gen-Probe assay positive/Ag-EIA negatives. Overall, it is concluded that although Ag-EIA and the Gen-Probe assay are effective substitutes for culture as a diagnostic procedure, there is a significant problem with samples which are culture-negative and from patients who have good serological evidence of current infection. Possible reasons for the disparity between the two assays are advanced.

Full text

PDF
685

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bak A. L., Black F. T., Christiansen C., Freundt E. A. Genome size of mycoplasmal DNA. Nature. 1969 Dec 20;224(5225):1209–1210. doi: 10.1038/2241209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clyde W. A., Jr, Hu P. C. Antigenic determinants of the attachment protein of Mycoplasma pneumoniae shared by other pathogenic Mycoplasma species. Infect Immun. 1986 Feb;51(2):690–692. doi: 10.1128/iai.51.2.690-692.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collier A. M., Clyde W. A., Jr Appearance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in lungs of experimentally infected hamsters and sputum from patients with natural disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974 Dec;110(6):765–773. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1974.110.6P1.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dular R., Kajioka R., Kasatiya S. Comparison of Gen-Probe commercial kit and culture technique for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):1068–1069. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.1068-1069.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hyman H. C., Yogev D., Razin S. DNA probes for detection and identification of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Apr;25(4):726–728. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.4.726-728.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kenny G. E., Cartwright F. D. Immunoblotting for determination of the antigenic specificities of antibodies to the Mycoplasmatales. Isr J Med Sci. 1984 Oct;20(10):908–911. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kok T. W., Varkanis G., Marmion B. P., Martin J., Esterman A. Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. 1. Direct detection of antigen in respiratory exudates by enzyme immunoassay. Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Dec;101(3):669–684. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800029551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Legros M., Kepes A. One-step fluorometric microassay of DNA in procaryotes. Anal Biochem. 1985 Jun;147(2):497–502. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90304-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lemcke R. M. Sizing small organisms. Nature. 1971 Feb 12;229(5285):492–493. doi: 10.1038/229492a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lind K., Lindhardt B. O., Schütten H. J., Blom J., Christiansen C. Serological cross-reactions between Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1036–1043. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1036-1043.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES