Skip to main content
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1991 Jan;79(1):17–27.

Clinical medical librarian: the last unicorn?

J M Demas 1, L T Ludwig 1
PMCID: PMC225479  PMID: 1998816

Abstract

In the information age of the 1990s, the clinical medical librarian (CML) concept, like many other personalized library services, is often criticized as being too labor-intensive and expensive; others praise its advantages. To determine the attitudes of medical school library directors and clinical department heads toward implementation and feasibility of a CML program, forty randomly selected medical schools were surveyed. A double-blind procedure was used to sample department heads in internal medicine, pediatrics, and surgery, as well as health sciences library directors identified by the Association of Academic Health Sciences Library Directors (AAHSLD) annual statistics. The survey instrument was designed to measure responses to the following attitudinal variables: acceptance and nonacceptance of a CML program; importance to patient care, education, and research; influence on information-seeking patterns of health care professionals; ethical issues; CML extension services; and costs. Seventy-nine usable questionnaires out of a total of 120 (66%) were obtained from clinical medical personnel, and 30 usable questionnaires out of a total of 40 (75%) were obtained from medical school library directors. Survey results indicated significant differences between clinical medical personnel and library personnel regarding attitudes toward CML influence on information-seeking patterns, ethics, alternative CML services, and costs. Survey results also indicated a continuing strong support for CML programs in the medical school setting; however, differences of opinion existed toward defining the role of the CML and determining responsibility for funding.

Full text

PDF
17

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Byrd G. D., Arnold L. Medical school graduates' retrospective evaluation of a clinical medical librarian program. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1979 Jul;67(3):308–312. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cimpl K. Clinical medical librarianship: a review of the literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1985 Jan;73(1):21–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clevesy S. R. A modified clinical medical librarian program for the community hospital. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Jan;68(1):70–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colaianni L. A. Clinical medical librarians in a private teaching-hospital setting. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1975 Oct;63(4):410–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greenberg B., Battison S., Kolisch M., Leredu M. Evaluation of a clinical medical librarian program at the Yale Medical Library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1978 Jul;66(3):319–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grose N. P., Hannigan G. G. A clinical librarian program in a family medicine residency. J Fam Pract. 1982 Nov;15(5):994–998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hutchinson S., Malamud J., Stearns N. S., Moulton B. Preselecting literature for routine delivery to physicians in a community hospital-based patient care related reading program. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1981 Apr;69(2):236–239. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kolner S. J., Dalrymple P. W., Christiansen R. Teaching skills in medical information retrieval to medical students. J Med Educ. 1986 Nov;61(11):906–910. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198611000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marshall J. G., Neufeld V. R. A randomized trial of librarian educational participation in clinical settings. J Med Educ. 1981 May;56(5):409–416. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198105000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller N., Kaye D. The experience of a department of medicine with a clinical medical library service. J Med Educ. 1985 May;60(5):367–373. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198505000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore M. Innovation and education: unlimited potential for the teaching library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Jan;77(1):26–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roach A. A., Addington W. W. The effects of an information specialist on patient care and medical education. J Med Educ. 1975 Feb;50(2):176–180. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197502000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schnall J. G., Wilson J. W. Evaluation of a clinical medical librarianship program at a university Health Sciences Library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Jul;64(3):278–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES