Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1997 Dec;43:2136–2142.

Ethical conflicts in home care. Patient autonomy and physician advocacy.

M E Boillat 1, D Gee 1, F Bellavance 1
PMCID: PMC2255107  PMID: 9426933

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether and how family physicians practising home care resolve ethical dilemmas in clinical management of homebound patients and to examine whether the self-reported, theoretical ethical positions of these physicians match their actual patient management. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Quebec community-based home care program. PARTICIPANTS: Quebec family physicians actively involved in community-based home care: 85 men and 65 women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician level of agreement with theoretical ethical statements about autonomy, caregiver needs, and resource allocation; management options chosen for a clinical case vignette; and mechanisms used for resolving conflicts. RESULTS: There were 209 respondents to the 279 questionnaires sent (75%). Of these, 59 who were not currently involved in home care were excluded, leaving 150 participants. Most (83.3%) physicians surveyed agreed with the ethical principle of patient autonomy; 88.7% agreed that the interests of family caregivers are important in decisions regarding patients, and 72.0% agreed that limiting home care services is reasonable in the context of limited resources. In managing a patient, 65.3% of physicians thought the patient should be placed in a nursing home against her wishes because of "danger to self," while 82.7% felt she should be placed if the caregiver is "exhausted." Three quarters of physicians did not limit or decrease home care services, despite noncompliance. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians practising community-based home care in Quebec have practical views on various ethical principles guiding home care practice. Except in the area of limiting or discontinuing home care services, their ethical framework is reflected in a case vignette of patient management.

Full text

PDF
2136

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agich G. J. Reassessing autonomy in long-term care. Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Nov-Dec;20(6):12–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry P. P., Crescenzi C. A., Radovsky L., Kern D. C., Steel K. Why elderly patients refuse hospitalization. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988 May;36(5):419–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb02380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brock D. W., Wartman S. A. When competent patients make irrational choices. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 31;322(22):1595–1599. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199005313222209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christie R. J., Freer C., Hoffmaster C. B., Stewart M. A. Ethical decision making by British general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Nov;39(328):448–451. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crisp R., Hope T., Ebbs D. The Asbury draft policy on ethical use of resources. BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1528–1533. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dubler N. N. Refusals of medical care in the home setting. Law Med Health Care. 1990 Fall;18(3):227–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb00025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hennessy C. H. Autonomy and risk: the role of client wishes in community-based long-term care. Gerontologist. 1989 Oct;29(5):633–639. doi: 10.1093/geront/29.5.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Iris M. A. The ethics of decision making for the critically ill elderly. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995 Spring;4(2):135–141. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100005806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz S. Growing number of elderly patients will mean more ethical issues for MDs, conference told. CMAJ. 1992 Oct 15;147(8):1239–1241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Komrad M. S. A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy. J Med Ethics. 1983 Mar;9(1):38–44. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.1.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Malley T. A., Everitt D. E., O'Malley H. C., Campion E. W. Identifying and preventing family-mediated abuse and neglect of elderly persons. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Jun;98(6):998–1005. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-98-6-998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Taler G. A., Waymack M. H. Ethics and the elderly. Prim Care. 1989 Jun;16(2):529–541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thomasma D. C. Freedom, dependency, and the care of the very old. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984 Dec;32(12):906–914. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1984.tb00892.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Young A., Pignatello C. H., Taylor M. B. Who's the boss? Ethical conflicts in home care. Health Prog. 1988 Dec;69(11):59–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES