Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1997 Jul;43:1241–1247.

Neonatal male circumcision after delisting in Ontario. Survey of new parents.

R E Walton 1, T Ostbye 1, M K Campbell 1
PMCID: PMC2255121  PMID: 9241462

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of neonatal circumcision immediately following delisting of the procedure in Ontario and to examine parents' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours regarding circumcision. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Perinatal tertiary care centre in southwestern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 151 mothers approached, three were excluded because they did not speak English and two declined participation; 112 of 146 mothers of healthy male newborns responded for a response rate of 77%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Circumcision status of infant and parents' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour. RESULTS: The circumcision rate before delisting had been 56.2%; in the months immediately after, the rate was 59.8% (95% confidence interval was 51%, 69%). Mothers of infants in the outcome groups did not differ significantly in any demographic feature other than education, where the group deciding against circumcision reported higher education levels (Wilcoxon nonparametic two-sample test: zeta = 2.29, P = 0.02). Mothers who chose circumcision listed medical (59%) and sociocultural considerations (40%) a most important to their decision. Father's circumcision status was strongly associated with the infant's (chi 2[df 1] = 25.13, P = 0.0001). Although 74% discussed circumcision with their family physicians, many parents were not well informed about risks or benefits. Anesthetic use during circumcision was reported by 29%, but 48% did not know whether any had been used. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of neonatal circumcision did not change after delisting. Informed consent was often lacking. Sociocultural issues are important to some parents and need to be addressed in the consultation process.

Full text

PDF
1241

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. N Engl J Med. 1990 Oct 25;323(17):1207–1209. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199010253231712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alibhai S. M. Male and female circumcision in Canada. CMAJ. 1993 Jul 1;149(1):16–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benini F., Johnston C. C., Faucher D., Aranda J. V. Topical anesthesia during circumcision in newborn infants. JAMA. 1993 Aug 18;270(7):850–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown M. S., Brown C. A. Circumcision decision: prominence of social concerns. Pediatrics. 1987 Aug;80(2):215–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen-Szalanski J. J., Boyce W. T., Harrell H., Gardner M. M. Circumcision and informed consent. Is more information always better? Med Care. 1987 Sep;25(9):856–867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cook L. S., Koutsky L. A., Holmes K. K. Circumcision and sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Public Health. 1994 Feb;84(2):197–201. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.2.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deber R. B. Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate. CMAJ. 1994 Aug 15;151(4):423–427. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ganiats T. G., Humphrey J. B., Taras H. L., Kaplan R. M. Routine neonatal circumcision: a cost-utility analysis. Med Decis Making. 1991 Oct-Dec;11(4):282–293. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9101100406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones M. Male circumcision in Canada. CMAJ. 1994 May 15;150(10):1541–1544. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LeBourdais E. Circumcision no longer a "routine" surgical procedure. CMAJ. 1995 Jun 1;152(11):1873–1876. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lynch M. E. Male and female circumcision in Canada. CMAJ. 1993 Jul 1;149(1):16–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maxwell L. G., Yaster M., Wetzel R. C., Niebyl J. R. Penile nerve block for newborn circumcision. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;70(3 Pt 1):415–419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McKim J. S. Neonatal circumcision. Can Med Assoc J. 1981 Nov 1;125(9):955–955. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Milos M. F., Macris D. Circumcision. A medical or a human rights issue? J Nurse Midwifery. 1992 Mar-Apr;37(2 Suppl):87S–96S. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(92)90012-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Morgan K. Male and female circumcision in Canada. CMAJ. 1993 Nov 15;149(10):1382–1383. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Poland R. L. The question of routine neonatal circumcision. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 3;322(18):1312–1315. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199005033221811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ryan C. A., Finer N. N. Changing attitudes and practices regarding local analgesia for newborn circumcision. Pediatrics. 1994 Aug;94(2 Pt 1):230–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sara C. A., Lowry C. J. A complication of circumcision and dorsal nerve block of the penis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1985 Feb;13(1):79–82. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8501300111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wallerstein E. Circumcision. The uniquely American medical enigma. Urol Clin North Am. 1985 Feb;12(1):123–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weatherstone K. B., Rasmussen L. B., Erenberg A., Jackson E. M., Claflin K. S., Leff R. D. Safety and efficacy of a topical anesthetic for neonatal circumcision. Pediatrics. 1993 Nov;92(5):710–714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wellington N., Rieder M. J. Attitudes and practices regarding analgesia for newborn circumcision. Pediatrics. 1993 Oct;92(4):541–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams N., Chell J., Kapila L. Why are children referred for circumcision? BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):28–28. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6869.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Winberg J., Bollgren I., Gothefors L., Herthelius M., Tullus K. The prepuce: a mistake of nature? Lancet. 1989 Mar 18;1(8638):598–599. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91619-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wiswell T. E., Smith F. R., Bass J. W. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics. 1985 May;75(5):901–903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES