Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1997 Apr;43:649–655.

Family physicians managing tuberculosis. Qualitative study of overcoming barriers.

L Jackson 1, L Yuan 1
PMCID: PMC2255495  PMID: 9111981

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the types of non-clinical barriers family physicians face in the management of TB, and to suggest strategies for overcoming these barriers. DESIGN: Qualitative study based on focus group discussions with family physicians and specialists in different types of practices. SETTING: Private practices, community health centres, and family practice units in hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians and specialists working in different practice settings. METHOD: At least one specialist participated in each focus group in order to understand possible differences in non-clinical barriers to TB management between family physicians and specialists. MAIN FINDINGS: Physicians can identify many types of non-clinical obstacles to TB management. Some obstacles appear to be directly related to the organization of family practice medicine, while others stem from the type of patient population seen or the stigma associated with TB. Some physicians question whether or not patient "noncompliance" is in fact a barrier to TB management. Many family physicians believe that they have readily available to them the expert opinion needed to manage TB effectively. CONCLUSIONS: Some specific interventions, such as changes in TB guidelines, could overcome some of the obstacles identified. Differences among family physicians in the organization and nature of their practice, and in their understanding of their role in TB management, however, should be taken into account in developing interventions because such differences could influence both the need for, and receptivity to, any changes.

Full text

PDF
649

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abe M. A. Japan's clinic physicians and their behavior. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(4):335–340. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhatti N., Law M. R., Morris J. K., Halliday R., Moore-Gillon J. Increasing incidence of tuberculosis in England and Wales: a study of the likely causes. BMJ. 1995 Apr 15;310(6985):967–969. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6985.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brancker A., Ellis E. Recent trends in tuberculosis incidence in Canada 1980-90. Can Commun Dis Rep. 1992 Sep 11;18(17):129–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown J. B., Sas G. Focus groups in family practice research: an example study of family physicians' approach to wife abuse. Fam Pract Res J. 1994 Mar;14(1):19–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cave A., Maharaj U., Gibson N., Jackson E. Physicians and immigrant patients. Cross-cultural communication. Can Fam Physician. 1995 Oct;41:1685–1690. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis P. B., Yee R. L., Millar J. Accounting for medical variation: the case of prescribing activity in a New Zealand general practice sample. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Aug;39(3):367–374. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90133-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Di Caccavo A., Reid F. Decisional conflict in general practice: strategies of patient management. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Aug;41(3):347–353. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00331-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Freudenberg N. A new role for community organizations in the prevention and control of tuberculosis. J Community Health. 1995 Feb;20(1):15–28. doi: 10.1007/BF02260493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glassroth J., Bailey W. C., Hopewell P. C., Schecter G., Harden J. W. Why tuberculosis is not prevented. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 May;141(5 Pt 1):1236–1240. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.5_Pt_1.1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holton D. Tuberculosis. A widespread health issue. Can Fam Physician. 1995 Sep;41:1447-9, 1462-4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klein S. J., Naizby B. E. New linkages for tuberculosis prevention and control in New York City: innovative use of non-traditional providers to enhance completion of therapy. J Community Health. 1995 Feb;20(1):5–13. doi: 10.1007/BF02260492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kochi A. The global tuberculosis situation and the new control strategy of the World Health Organization. Tubercle. 1991 Mar;72(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/0041-3879(91)90017-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCarthy M., Wilson-Davis K., McGavock H. Relationship between the number of partners in a general practice and the number of different drugs prescribed by that practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jan;42(354):10–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rieder H. L., Cauthen G. M., Comstock G. W., Snider D. E., Jr Epidemiology of tuberculosis in the United States. Epidemiol Rev. 1989;11:79–98. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schwartz R. K., Soumerai S. B., Avorn J. Physician motivations for nonscientific drug prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(6):577–582. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90252-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stoker N. Tuberculosis in a changing world. BMJ. 1994 Nov 5;309(6963):1178–1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6963.1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sudre P., ten Dam G., Kochi A. Tuberculosis: a global overview of the situation today. Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70(2):149–159. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor K. M., Shapiro M., Skinner H. A., Eakin J., Kelner M. Understanding physicians' response to AIDS. CMAJ. 1989 Mar 15;140(6):597–602. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yuan L., Richardson E., Kendall P. R. Evaluation of a tuberculosis screening program for high-risk students in Toronto schools. CMAJ. 1995 Oct 1;153(7):925–932. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES