Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether family physicians would participate in the Family Physician Model (FPM) recruitment strategy for mammography screening, whether participating physicians differed from non-participating physicians, and whether the strategy would recruit 70% of eligible women in the participating practices. DESIGN: Family physicians were invited to participate in the project. Staff from the Ontario Breast Screening Program-Hamilton Centre (OBSP-H) identified eligible women, prepared personalized letters recommending screening, and monitored compliance. Participating and non-participating physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire. SETTING: Family practices in Dundas, Ancaster, and Hamilton, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 50 years and older who met eligibility criteria for screening. Family physicians in Dundas, Ancaster, and Hamilton. INTERVENTION: Family physicians were approached by the Health Promotion Officer at the OBSP-H about participating in the FPM. Eligible women in their practices were sent letters recommending breast screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of family physicians agreeing to participate in the FPM, characteristics of participating and non-participating physicians, and percentage of eligible women who scheduled mammograms. RESULTS: Of the 114 family physicians approached, 76 (67%) agreed to participate. Significantly more participating than non-participating physicians were in group practice and had certification in family medicine. In response to the letters, 54% of eligible women obtained mammograms. Because 12% of women were ineligible since they had been referred for screening within the previous 12 months, 66% of women in the participating practices actually obtained mammograms over the 2-year period-almost the target 70%. CONCLUSION: The FPM is a successful recruitment strategy.
Full text
PDF





Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Austoker J. Screening and self examination for breast cancer. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):168–174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baines C. J. Breast-cancer screening. Can Fam Physician. 1987 Apr;33:915–922. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coll P. P., O'Connor P. J., Crabtree B. F., Besdine R. W. Effects of age, education, and physician advice on utilization of screening mammography. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989 Oct;37(10):957–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb07281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher S. W., Black W., Harris R., Rimer B. K., Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20;85(20):1644–1656. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.20.1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kruse J., Phillips D. M. Factors influencing women's decision to undergo mammography. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Nov;70(5):744–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lantz P. M., Remington P. L., Soref M. Self-reported barriers to mammography: implications for physicians. Wis Med J. 1990 Oct;89(10):602, 605-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McAuley R. G., Lusk S. Mammography screening by family physicians. CMAJ. 1989 Oct 15;141(8):765–767. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller A. B. Mammography: reviewing the evidence. Epidemiology aspect. Can Fam Physician. 1993 Jan;39:85–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schechter C., Vanchieri C. F., Crofton C. Evaluating women's attitudes and perceptions in developing mammography promotion messages. Public Health Rep. 1990 May-Jun;105(3):253–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schofield P. E., Cockburn J., Hill D. J., Reading D. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies. J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):144–149. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snadden D. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in family practice: A review of the literature. Can Fam Physician. 1992 Aug;38:1785–1788. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
