Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1997 May;43:883–888.

Recruiting women for breast screening. Family Physician Model strategy.

R G McAuley 1, C Rand 1, M Levine 1
PMCID: PMC2255545  PMID: 9154360

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether family physicians would participate in the Family Physician Model (FPM) recruitment strategy for mammography screening, whether participating physicians differed from non-participating physicians, and whether the strategy would recruit 70% of eligible women in the participating practices. DESIGN: Family physicians were invited to participate in the project. Staff from the Ontario Breast Screening Program-Hamilton Centre (OBSP-H) identified eligible women, prepared personalized letters recommending screening, and monitored compliance. Participating and non-participating physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire. SETTING: Family practices in Dundas, Ancaster, and Hamilton, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 50 years and older who met eligibility criteria for screening. Family physicians in Dundas, Ancaster, and Hamilton. INTERVENTION: Family physicians were approached by the Health Promotion Officer at the OBSP-H about participating in the FPM. Eligible women in their practices were sent letters recommending breast screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of family physicians agreeing to participate in the FPM, characteristics of participating and non-participating physicians, and percentage of eligible women who scheduled mammograms. RESULTS: Of the 114 family physicians approached, 76 (67%) agreed to participate. Significantly more participating than non-participating physicians were in group practice and had certification in family medicine. In response to the letters, 54% of eligible women obtained mammograms. Because 12% of women were ineligible since they had been referred for screening within the previous 12 months, 66% of women in the participating practices actually obtained mammograms over the 2-year period-almost the target 70%. CONCLUSION: The FPM is a successful recruitment strategy.

Full text

PDF
883

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Austoker J. Screening and self examination for breast cancer. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):168–174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baines C. J. Breast-cancer screening. Can Fam Physician. 1987 Apr;33:915–922. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coll P. P., O'Connor P. J., Crabtree B. F., Besdine R. W. Effects of age, education, and physician advice on utilization of screening mammography. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989 Oct;37(10):957–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb07281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fletcher S. W., Black W., Harris R., Rimer B. K., Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20;85(20):1644–1656. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.20.1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kruse J., Phillips D. M. Factors influencing women's decision to undergo mammography. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Nov;70(5):744–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lantz P. M., Remington P. L., Soref M. Self-reported barriers to mammography: implications for physicians. Wis Med J. 1990 Oct;89(10):602, 605-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McAuley R. G., Lusk S. Mammography screening by family physicians. CMAJ. 1989 Oct 15;141(8):765–767. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller A. B. Mammography: reviewing the evidence. Epidemiology aspect. Can Fam Physician. 1993 Jan;39:85–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schechter C., Vanchieri C. F., Crofton C. Evaluating women's attitudes and perceptions in developing mammography promotion messages. Public Health Rep. 1990 May-Jun;105(3):253–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schofield P. E., Cockburn J., Hill D. J., Reading D. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies. J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):144–149. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Snadden D. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in family practice: A review of the literature. Can Fam Physician. 1992 Aug;38:1785–1788. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES