Skip to main content
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1992 Jan;80(1):19–22.

Clinical medical librarian impact on patient care: a one-year analysis.

R J Veenstra 1
PMCID: PMC225610  PMID: 1537012

Abstract

The primary role of the clinical medical librarian (CML)--locating and providing quality-filtered, patient-specific information to physicians--has been questioned recently because of the dramatic rise in end-user searching. This study administered a questionnaire to evaluate the current impact of this service in a major hospital setting with a long established CML program. The study showed that the CML provided house officers with information that affected patient care (defined as diagnosis, diagnostic tests, or treatment) between 40% and 59% of the time. This was true even though most physicians reported they generally researched the question prior to consulting the CML. In addition, the house officers in this study indicated that they distributed the CML-provided information to other health care providers 56%-96% of the time. Based on these limited results, it appears that CMLs can continue to provide information that has a strong impact on patient care, despite the availability of an end-user local MEDLINE system.

Full text

PDF
19

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barbour G. L., Young M. N. Morning report. Role of the clinical librarian. JAMA. 1986 Apr 11;255(14):1921–1922. doi: 10.1001/jama.255.14.1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cimpl K. Clinical medical librarianship: a review of the literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1985 Jan;73(1):21–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Demas J. M., Ludwig L. T. Clinical medical librarian: the last unicorn? Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Jan;79(1):17–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Halsted D. D., Ward D. H., Neeley D. M. The evolving role of clinical medical librarians. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Jul;77(3):299–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Horak E. B. Clinical librarianship in an era of end users. Med Ref Serv Q. 1987 Summer;6(2):65–69. doi: 10.1300/j115v06n02_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lamb G. Bridging the information gap. Hosp Libr. 1976 Nov 15;1(10):2–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Miller N. Effects of cost sharing and end-user searching on a clinical medical librarian program. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Jan;77(1):71–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Scura G., Davidoff F. Case-related use of the medical literature. Clinical librarian services for improving patient care. JAMA. 1981 Jan 2;245(1):50–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Staudt C., Halbrook B., Brodman E. A clinical librarians' program--an attempt at evaluation. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Apr;64(2):236–238. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES