Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1992 Apr;80(2):124–130.

Impact of end-user search training on pharmacy students: a four-year follow-up study.

N R Ikeda 1, D G Schwartz 1
PMCID: PMC225635  PMID: 1600421

Abstract

The Alfred Taubman Medical Library at the University of Michigan has offered instruction in online literature searching to third-year pharmacy students as a component of the course "Drug Information and Scientific Literature Evaluation" since 1983. In the spring of 1989, a follow-up study was conducted to assess the impact of instruction on four classes of graduates. Of a pool of 151 graduates, 90 (60%) responded to a mailed questionnaire on their use of information and computerized literature searching. The respondents were divided into four subgroups: end-user searchers, users of intermediaries, end users who used intermediaries, and those who did not use computerized literature search systems. Seventy-two percent of the respondents used some type of computerized literature searching, and 42% performed their own searches. The four subgroups differed in general computer use, familiarity with MEDLINE search terminology, information use, reasons for using or not using literature searching, and characteristics of searches (i.e., type, time frame, amount, and frequency). Training in end-user search systems appears to have had an impact on the continued use of computerized literature searching several years after the formal educational program.

Full text

PDF
124

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ben-Shir R. Fast Inter Library Loans and Statistics, enhanced version 2.0. Med Ref Serv Q. 1986 Spring;5(1):17–39. doi: 10.1300/j115v05n01_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ludwig L., Mixter J. K., Emanuele M. A. User attitudes toward end-user literature searching. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988 Jan;76(1):7–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Matheson N. W., Cooper J. A. Academic information in the academic health sciences center. Roles for the library in information management. J Med Educ. 1982 Oct;57(10 Pt 2):1–93. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198210000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Dilks C. J., Ramsden M. F., Ryan N. C., Baker L., Flemming T., Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Dec;23(6):583–593. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(90)90042-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Poisson E. H. End-user searching in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986 Oct;74(4):293–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sewell W., Teitelbaum S. Observations of end-user online searching behavior over eleven years. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1986 Jul;37(4):234–245. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198607)37:4<234::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Soben P., Green E. W. GRATEFUL MED searching: a hospital library perspective. Med Ref Serv Q. 1988;7(3):35–43. doi: 10.1300/J115v07n03_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Starr S. S., Renford B. L. Evaluation of a program to teach health professionals to search MEDLINE. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987 Jul;75(3):193–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wood E. H., Morrison J. L., Oppenheimer P. R. Drug information skills for pharmacy students: curriculum integration. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Jan;78(1):8–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES