Skip to main content
PMC home page
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1993 Jan;81(1):44–47.

Citation patterns in the health sciences: implications for serials/monographic fund allocation.

A J Burdick 1, A Butler 1, M G Sullivan 1
PMCID: PMC225727  PMID: 8428188

Abstract

This study sought to determine optimal serial-to-monograph ratios for collection development by comparing citation frequency with current library practice. Internal medicine literature cited an average of 88% serial references and 12% monographs. In an observational study, teaching physicians on internal medicine rounds cited 89.5% serials and 10.5% monographs to student teams. By contrast, health sciences libraries included in the Houston statistics spend an average of 79% of acquisitions budgets for serials and 21% for monographs. An 88:12 acquisitions budget ratio would be more appropriate, reflecting actual use of serials and monographs in the health sciences.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brandon A. N., Hill D. R. Selected list of books and journals for the small medical library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Apr;79(2):195–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell F. M. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Oct;78(4):376–382. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972 Nov 3;178(4060):471–479. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gregory J. AN EVALUATION OF MEDICAL PERIODICALS. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1937 Feb;25(3):172–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lacroix E. M., Dutcher G. A. A comparison of interlibrary loan requests received by the National Library of Medicine: 1959 and 1984. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987 Jan;75(1):7–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Raisig L. M., Smith M., Cuff R., Kilgour F. G. How biomedical investigators use library books. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1966 Apr;54(2):104–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stinson E. R., Mueller D. A. Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs. Conducted through personal interviews. JAMA. 1980 Jan 11;243(2):140–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wood D. N., Bower C. A. Survey of medical literature borrowed from the national lending library for science and technology. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1969 Jan;57(1):47–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES