Abstract
One hundred sixty-one MEDLINE searches conducted by third-year medical students were analyzed and evaluated to determine which search moves were used, whether those individual moves were effective, and whether there was a relationship between specific search behaviors and the effectiveness of the search strategy as a whole. The typical search included fourteen search statements, used seven terms or "limit" commands, and resulted in the display of eleven citations. The most common moves were selection of a database, entering single-word terms and free-text term phrases, and combining sets of terms. Syntactic errors were also common. Overall, librarians judged the searches to be adequate, and students were quite satisfied with their own searches. However, librarians also identified many missed opportunities in the search strategies, including underutilization of the controlled vocabulary, subheadings, and synonyms for search concepts. No strong relationships were found between specific search behaviors and search effectiveness (as measured by the librarians' or students' evaluations). Implications of these findings for system design and user education are discussed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Miller N., Kirby M., Templeton E. MEDLINE on CD-ROM: end user searching in a medical school library. Med Ref Serv Q. 1988;7(3):1–13. doi: 10.1300/J115v07n03_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sewell W., Bevan A. Nonmediated use of MEDLINE and TOXLINE by pathologists and pharmacists. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Oct;64(4):382–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slingluff D., Lev Y., Eisan A. An end user search service in an academic health sciences library. Med Ref Serv Q. 1985 Spring;4(1):11–21. doi: 10.1300/j115v04n01_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker C. J., McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Ramsden M. F. Problems encountered by clinical end users of MEDLINE and GRATEFUL MED. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Jan;79(1):67–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]