Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1996 Oct;84(4):461–467.

A journal use study: checkouts and in-house use.

P L Walter 1
PMCID: PMC226183  PMID: 8913547

Abstract

Journal use studies provide meaningful data to consider in shaping a library's journal collection. The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library undertook such a study of 2,552 print subscription titles over one year, gathering data on circulation, in-house use, and interlibrary loan (ILL) use. Objectives focused on gathering practical data to support cancellation decisions and to determine whether reliable relationships of in-house to checkout use would emerge, upon which to base future decisions. Data were analyzed for all titles, for titles grouped by publication frequency, and for titles grouped by ten major subject headings. Results, to be interpreted within the limitations of this study and of use studies in general, showed in-house use to be higher than checkouts across all subjects and all publication frequencies-but in ratios too complex to be reduced to a single regression line. All use increases with increases in titles' frequency of publication. Even titles with few or no checkouts show some in-house use. Patterns of serial use differ among general subject disciplines.

Full text

PDF
461

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ash J., Morgan J. E. Journal evaluation study at the University of Connecticut Health Center. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1977 Apr;65(2):297–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bader S. A., Thompson L. L. Analyzing in-house journal utilization: an added dimension in decision making. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Apr;77(2):216–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bastille J. D., Mankin C. J. A simple objective method for determining a dynamic journal collection. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Oct;68(4):357–366. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourne C. P. Planning serials cancellations and cooperative collection development in the health sciences: methodology and background information. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1975 Oct;63(4):366–377. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burkhardt D. C. The audit payoff: medical journal titles most in demand. Libr J. 1990 Mar 1;115(4):59–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hunt R. K. Journal deselection in a biomedical research library: a mediated mathematical approach. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Jan;78(1):45–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kamenoff L. Journal usage at a community hospital library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1977 Jan;65(1):58–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Riordan P. J., Gjerdet N. R. The use of periodical literature in a Norwegian dental library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1981 Oct;69(4):387–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith J. M. A periodical use study at Children's Hospital of Michigan. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1970 Jan;58(1):65–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tibbetts P. A method for estimating the in-house use of the periodical collection in the University of Minnesota Bio-Medical Library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1974 Jan;62(1):37–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Veenstra R. J. A one-year journal use study in a veterinary medical library. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987 Mar 15;190(6):623–626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES