Skip to main content
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1997 Oct;85(4):348–355.

The medical specialist: information gateway or gatekeeper for the family practitioner.

R Cullen 1
PMCID: PMC226291  PMID: 9431423

Abstract

The medical specialist emerged as a critical gatekeeper in a study of information sources used by family practitioners in New Zealand. Thirty-four practitioners in the Wellington region were interviewed and their responses examined to ascertain the extent to which five criteria influenced their choice of information sources for clinical decision-making. The criteria were availability, searchability, understandability, credibility, and applicability. Of three major information sources investigated (textbooks, colleagues, and medical specialists), textbooks were consulted most frequently but were rated less valuable than colleagues and specialists as a source of information. The medical specialist was identified as the information source that best meets the five criteria. Thus, specialists play an important role in disseminating information to family practitioners. However, female practitioners included in the study were less likely to approach specialists than were their male counterparts. Physicians made little use of medical libraries to support clinical decision-making. The apparent disadvantage of female practitioners in accessing specialists needs to be addressed by professional associations. Medical librarians seeking to improve the access of family practitioners to recent literature should consider the heavy use made of specialists as a source of information.

Full text

PDF
348

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Connelly D. P., Rich E. C., Curley S. P., Kelly J. T. Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1990 Mar;30(3):353–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geyman J. P. Family practice and the gatekeeper role. J Fam Pract. 1983 Oct;17(4):587–588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glasgow N. The gatekeeper controversy: why it exists and how it can be resolved. N Z Med J. 1996 May 10;109(1021):168–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gruppen L. D., Wolf F. M., Van Voorhees C., Stross J. K. Information-seeking strategies and differences among primary care physicians. Mobius. 1987;7(3):18–26. doi: 10.1002/chp.4760070306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reagan M. D. Physicians as gatekeepers. A complex challenge. N Engl J Med. 1987 Dec 31;317(27):1731–1734. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198712313172709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Verhoeven A. A., Boerma E. J., Meyboom-de Jong B. Use of information sources by family physicians: a literature survey. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Jan;83(1):85–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES