Skip to main content
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1997 Oct;85(4):402–410.

Information-seeking behavior of health sciences faculty: the impact of new information technologies.

K L Curtis 1, A C Weller 1, J M Hurd 1
PMCID: PMC226298  PMID: 9431430

Abstract

This paper reports on an ongoing investigation into health sciences faculty's information-seeking behavior, including their use of new information technologies. A survey was administered to all faculty in medicine, nursing, and pharmacy at the University of Illinois at Chicago. It was similar to one administered to the same population in 1991. The survey asked about faculty's use of electronic resources, documented any shift from the use of print to electronic formats, and measured the utilization of library training. The response rate was 48.5% for medicine faculty, 45.0% for nursing, and 62.5% for pharmacy. The study found that use of the print Index Medicus among faculty was in transition: While 30.5% continued to use the print resources, 68.0% of faculty accessed MEDLINE through electronic means. Faculty preferred accessing electronic databases from their offices to doing so from the library. Health sciences faculty used a wide variety of databases, in addition to MEDLINE, to fill their information needs. Most faculty did not take advantage of either in-house or electronic training sessions offered by librarians. The study concluded that the training preferences of faculty need to be further explored.

Full text

PDF
402

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blecic D. D. Comparison of fixed-fee Grateful Med database use and searching success rates given the continued availability of MEDLINE in other formats. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Oct;84(4):507–512. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Curtis K. L., Weller A. C. Information-seeking behavior: a survey of health sciences faculty use of indexes and databases. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Oct;81(4):383–392. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Martin E. R., Lanier D. Delivering medical information to the desktop: the UIC GRATEFUL-MED-via-the-Internet experience. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Oct;83(4):402–406. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Robbins K. Use of MEDLINE by health sciences faculty at the University of Minnesota. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Apr;81(2):226–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES