Abstract
The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between library journal use and journal citation use in the medical sciences. The six-month journal use study was conducted in the Library of the Veterans General Hospital in Taipei. The data on citation frequency and impact factors were obtained from Journal Citation Reports, 1993 microfiche edition. The study explored the use, citation, and impact factor data, especially for heavily used, highly cited, or high-impact-factor journals. The correlations between frequency of use and citation frequency and between frequency of use and impact factor were determined by using the Spearman rank and Pearson correlation tests. The same comparisons were also made within four subject categories: clinical medicine journals, life science journals, hybrid journals publishing both clinical medicine and life science papers, and journals that publish neither clinical medicine nor life science articles. The results of the study showed that there is a significant correlation between frequency of use and citation frequency, and between frequency of use and impact factor for all titles. There is also a significant correlation between frequency of use and citation frequency and between frequency of use and impact factor for journals that publish either clinical medicine or life science articles, or both. However, the correlation is not significant for other journals.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Hansson S. Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals. Lancet. 1995 Sep 30;346(8979):906–906. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92749-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Littleton J. T., Durizch M. L., Callahan W. P. Linear vs. pluridirectional tomography of the chest: correlative radiographic anatomic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980 Feb;134(2):241–248. doi: 10.2214/ajr.134.2.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metcalfe N. B. Journal impact factors. Nature. 1995 Aug 31;376(6543):720–720. doi: 10.1038/376720b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]