Skip to main content
PMC home page
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1998 Jan;86(1):68–76.

Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends.

J A Kelly 1
PMCID: PMC226328  PMID: 9549015

Abstract

Abstracts of scientific papers and posters that are presented at annual scientific meetings of professional societies are part of the broader category of conference literature. They are an important avenue for the dissemination of current data. While timely and succinct, these abstracts present problems such as an abbreviated peer review and incomplete bibliographic access. METHODS: Seventy societies of health sciences professionals were surveyed about the publication of abstracts from their annual meetings. Nineteen frequently cited journals also were contacted about their policies on the citation of meeting abstracts. Ten databases were searched for the presence of meetings abstracts. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the seventy societies publish their abstracts, with nearly half appearing in the society's journal. Seventy-seven percent of the societies supply meeting attendees with a copy of each abstract, and 43% make their abstracts available in an electronic format. Most of the journals surveyed allow meeting abstracts to be cited. Bibliographic access to these abstracts does not appear to be widespread. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting abstracts play an important role in the dissemination of scientific knowledge. Bibliographic access to meeting abstracts is very limited. The trend toward making meeting abstracts available via the Internet has the potential to give a broader audience access to the information they contain.

Full text

PDF
68

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alberani V., De Castro Pietrangeli P., Mazza A. M. The use of grey literature in health sciences: a preliminary survey. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Oct;78(4):358–363. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bero L. A., Galbraith A., Rennie D. The publication of sponsored symposiums in medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 15;327(16):1135–1140. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210153271606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Corry A. M. A survey of the publication history of randomly selected IADR/AADR abstracts presented in 1983 and 1984. J Dent Res. 1990 Aug;69(8):1453–1455. doi: 10.1177/00220345900690080101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. De Bellefeuille C., Morrison C. A., Tannock I. F. The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. Ann Oncol. 1992 Mar;3(3):187–191. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dudley H. A. Surgical research: master or servant. Am J Surg. 1978 Mar;135(3):458–460. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90084-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ernster L., Whelan W. J. Short reports: a new format for disseminating information from scientific meetings. FASEB J. 1987 Nov;1(5):423–424. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.1.5.3678701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evered D., Porter R., Nugent J. International scientific meetings: relation between structure and function. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Oct 12;291(6501):1028–1031. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6501.1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Funk M. E., Reid C. A. The usefulness of monographic proceedings. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988 Jan;76(1):14–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldman L., Loscalzo A. Fate of cardiology research originally published in abstract form. N Engl J Med. 1980 Jul 31;303(5):255–259. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198007313030504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gorman R. L., Oderda G. M. Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings: a measure of quality? Vet Hum Toxicol. 1990 Oct;32(5):470–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jetté J. P. Veterinary conference proceedings database. Can Vet J. 1994 Nov;35(11):675–675. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Juzych M. S., Shin D. H., Coffey J. B., Parrow K. A., Tsai C. S., Briggs K. S. Pattern of publication of ophthalmic abstracts in peer-reviewed journals. Ophthalmology. 1991 Apr;98(4):553–556. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32256-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Juzych M. S., Shin D. H., Coffey J., Juzych L., Shin D. Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association for research in vision and ophthalmology? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Apr;34(5):1879–1882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kingsley G. They turned down my abstract again... Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Apr;34(4):303–305. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/34.4.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klimek J. J. Concrete thoughts about abstracts. Am J Infect Control. 1993 Oct;21(5):223–225. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90412-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lichter P. R. Bibliographies and abstracts. Ophthalmology. 1993 Jan;100(1):7–8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31690-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maxwell M. B. Published or perished: what becomes of papers presented at oncology nursing society congresses? Oncol Nurs Forum. 1981 Summer;8(3):73–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McCormick M. C., Holmes J. H. Publication of research presented at the pediatric meetings. Change in selection. Am J Dis Child. 1985 Feb;139(2):122–126. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140040020017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meranze J., Ellison N., Greenhow D. E. Publications resulting from anesthesia meeting abstracts. Anesth Analg. 1982 May;61(5):445–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Relman A. S. News reports of medical meetings: how reliable are abstracts? N Engl J Med. 1980 Jul 31;303(5):277–278. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198007313030509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rubin H. R., Redelmeier D. A., Wu A. W., Steinberg E. P. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 May;8(5):255–258. doi: 10.1007/BF02600092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sacks J. J., Peterson D. E. Improving conference abstract selection. Epidemiology. 1994 Nov;5(6):636–637. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199411000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Scherer R. W., Dickersin K., Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):158–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwartz R. S. The conference proceedings: a white elephant. Immunol Today. 1990 Apr;11(4):112–113. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(90)90045-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Truelson S. D., Jr Selecting for health sciences library collections when budgets falter. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Apr;64(2):187–195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1459–1473. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yentis S. M., Campbell F. A., Lerman J. Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jul;40(7):632–634. doi: 10.1007/BF03009700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES