Abstract
BACKGROUND: Journal usage studies, which are useful for budget management and for evaluating collection performance relative to library use, have generally described a single library or subject discipline. The Southern Chapter/Medical Library Association (SC/MLA) study has examined journal usage at the aggregate data level with the long-term goal of developing hospital library benchmarks for journal use. METHODS: Thirty-six SC/MLA hospital libraries, categorized for the study by size as small, medium, or large, reported current journal title use centrally for a one-year period following standardized data collection procedures. Institutional and aggregate data were analyzed for the average annual frequency of use, average costs per use and non-use, and average percent of non-used titles. Permutation F-type tests were used to measure difference among the three hospital groups. RESULTS: Averages were reported for each data set analysis. Statistical tests indicated no significant differences between the hospital groups, suggesting that benchmarks can be derived applying to all types of hospital libraries. The unanticipated lack of commonality among heavily used titles pointed to a need for uniquely tailored collections. CONCLUSION: Although the small sample size precluded definitive results, the study's findings constituted a baseline of data that can be compared against future studies.
Full text
PDF





Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bader S. A., Thompson L. L. Analyzing in-house journal utilization: an added dimension in decision making. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Apr;77(2):216–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bastille J. D., Mankin C. J. A simple objective method for determining a dynamic journal collection. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Oct;68(4):357–366. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bleeker A., Tjiam I. A., Volkers A. C., Smith-Bogers J. Analysis of external and internal interlibrary loan requests: aid in collection management. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Oct;78(4):345–352. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burkhardt D. C. The audit payoff: medical journal titles most in demand. Libr J. 1990 Mar 1;115(4):59–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colglazier M. L., Jr The causal relationship between clinical activity and journal use in a hospital library as analyzed by multiple regression. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Oct;84(4):569–571. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dee C., Blazek R. Information needs of the rural physician: a descriptive study. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Jul;81(3):259–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mullaly-Quijas P., Ward D. H., Woelfl N. Using focus groups to discover health professionals' information needs: a regional marketing study. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994 Jul;82(3):305–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osiobe S. A. Use of information resources by health professionals: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(9):965–973. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90418-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverstein J. L. Strengthening the links between health sciences information users and providers. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Oct;83(4):407–417. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walter P. L. A journal use study: checkouts and in-house use. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Oct;84(4):461–467. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woolf S. H., Benson D. A. The medical information needs of internists and pediatricians at an academic medical center. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Oct;77(4):372–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
