Skip to main content
International Orthopaedics logoLink to International Orthopaedics
. 2006 Sep 1;31(5):613–616. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0232-6

Closed suction drains do not increase the blood transfusion rates in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

R O Sundaram 1,2,, R W Parkinson 1
PMCID: PMC2266643  PMID: 16947048

Abstract

We aim to determine whether the presence of a drain increases the actual blood transfusion rates in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective review was performed on two consecutive groups of patients who underwent primary TKA: group 1 including 100 patients who underwent TKA and had one deep closed suction drain; group 2 including 100 patients who underwent TKA and had no drain. Blood transfusions were given post-operatively on the basis of clinical need without a pre-determined haemoglobin trigger factor. Group 1 drained a mean of 692 ml (range 150–1500) of blood in 48 h. The mean fall in haemoglobin at 48 h post-operatively was 3.26 g/dl in group 1 and 3.33 g/dl in group 2. Nine patients in group 1 and seven patients in group 2 required a blood transfusion; this was not statistically significant (P=0.79). Transfusion of primary TKA patients on the basis of clinical need can result in post-operative transfusion rates of 8%. The presence of a drain does not increase the transfusion rates of patients undergoing primary TKA.

Introduction

Post-operative blood transfusion rates following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), in the current medical literature, are between 11–70%. These studies report that patients following TKA are transfused if they are symptomatic, or are automatically transfused if their post-operative haemoglobin has fallen below a trigger value, which is commonly between 8–10 g/dl [5, 10, 12, 16, 22, 24, 25]. Hamer et al. recommends that patients with a haemoglobin count between 8–10 g/dl should only be transfused if symptomatic [11]. In two recent surveys performed in the United Kingdom regarding TKA, the majority of knee arthroplasty surgeons still use closed-suction drains [3, 4]. A large meta-analysis of 237 patients by who underwent TKA, showed that closed-suction drains may actually increase the risk of blood transfusion rates [19]. In these studies, patients were transfused if their haemoglobin fell below a certain trigger value; therefore, some patients may have been transfused when clinically not indicated [1, 8, 14, 18]. The many potential complications following blood transfusion are well documented, hence unnecessary transfusions should be avoided [25].

We are unaware of any study that compares the actual transfusion rates where a haemoglobin trigger factor was not used to initiate transfusion post-operatively in patients undergoing primary TKA; both those patients who had a closed suction drain and those who did not. We aim to determine whether the presence of a drain increases the actual blood transfusion requirement in patients undergoing primary TKA for primary osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

The senior author’s (RWP) routine policy of blood transfusion following primary TKA is to transfuse according to clinical need alone, which is not set by a pre-determined haemoglobin trigger factor to initiate transfusion. We retrospectively reviewed 200 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA for primary osteoarthritis (OA) over a 2.5-year period with the senior author RWP at our institution. The first 100 consecutive patients (group 1) all had one deep Redivac closed-suction drain inserted at the time of closure which was removed 48 h after surgery. The next 100 consecutive patients (group 2) did not have a closed suction drain. In both groups, patients were transfused according to clinical need alone (if they were short of breath, tachycardic, had low blood pressure and found mobilisation difficult); a haemoglobin trigger factor was not used to influence post-operative transfusion. To determine a P-value of <0.05 to be significant and give this study a power of 80%, we needed to review a minimum of 87 patients in each group [18]. We reviewed the pre-operative (pre-op) and 48 h post-operative (post-op) haemoglobin values and the transfusion rates according to the clinical need of the two groups. We also determined the number of patients that would have been transfused in each group if various haemoglobin trigger factors were used.

Patients undergoing primary TKA were seen pre-operatively within 6 weeks of surgery and had routine blood samples taken which were ‘group and saved’. Patients on Aspirin were asked to stop taking it 10 days before surgery. All the primary TKAs in this study were performed by or were directly supervised by the senior author RWP. The preparation and surgery in all the patients was identical. All patients underwent a general anaesthetic with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. An above-knee tourniquet was used and the patient’s knee was double prepped with aqueous providone-iodine solution. A medial parapatellar skin incision and trivector arthrotomy was used. The prosthesis used was the Anatomic Modular Knee (AMK, Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana). The femoral, tibial and patella components were fixed with cement. The knee was closed using Vicryl for all the layers including the skin. Steristrips were applied to the incision; the incision was then covered with Melolin, and two layers of wool and crepe bandage were applied. The tourniquet was deflated immediately after the crepe bandage was applied. Patients were allowed to mobilise on the first post-operative day and the dressings were removed. The single closed suction drain in group 1 was removed at 48 hours.

Statistics Analysis was performed using the software Medcalc (Mariakerke, Belgium, Version 8.1.1.0). The mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) are given. The un-paired t-test was used to determine differences in haemoglobin between the two groups. The chi-squared test was used to determine if there was a significant difference in the number of patients being transfused in each group. The chi-squared test was used to determine if there was a significant difference in the number of patients being transfused if trigger values were used.

Results

Patients in group 1 and 2 were equally matched for age and weight. In both groups of patients, there were twice as many females as males (Table 1). There was no significant difference between the mean pre-op and 48-h post-op haemoglobin values (Table 2). Group 1 patients; a mean of 526 ml (range 50–1,500 ml) of blood drained at 24 h. A mean total of 692 ml (range 150–1,500 ml) of blood was drained at 48 h. A total of 1,500 ml of blood had been drained in 24 h from one patient who became clinically symptomatic; the patient was transfused with two units of blood before a check haemoglobin was obtained. This patient’s pre-op Hb was 15.8 g/dl, and the post transfusion haemoglobin was 11.8 g/dl. As we were unable to obtain the 48-h post-op haemoglobin for this patient, the patient's haematology data was removed from the calculations. A total of nine patients out of 100 in group 1, and seven patients out of 100 in group 2, were transfused post-operatively after 48 h according to clinical need. There was no statistical difference in the number of patients transfused between the groups (chi-squared; P=0.79). All these patients were clinically pale, short of breath and tachycardic and found mobilisation difficult as a result. None of the patients required an intra-operative blood transfusion. Patients who were transfused were given two units of blood. Table 3 shows the number of patients in each group that would have been transfused if trigger factors were used.

Table 1.

Demographic details of the patients

  Group 1 (100 patients) Group 2 (100 patients) P-value
  Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI  
Sex (male:female) 1:2 - 1:2 - -
Age (years) 72.35 70.82–73.88 74.2 72.42–76.0 0.12
Weight (kg) 78.1 75.66–80.50 76.08 72.9–79.3 0.32

Table 2.

Pre-op and post-op haemoglobin values of the two groups

  Group 1 (99 patients) Group 2 (100 patients) P-value
  Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI  
Pre-op Hbg/dl 13.33 13.06–13.61 13.42 13.18–13.68 0.63
Post-op Hbg/dl 10.07 9.81–10.33 10.09 9.79–10.39 0.93

Table 3.

Number of patients that would have been transfused if haemoglobin trigger values were used solely

Hbg/dl Group 1 (drain), 99 patients Group 2 (no drain),100 Patients P-value
<10 50 51 1.0
<9.5 36 37 1.0
<9 23 25 0.87
<8.5 8 12 0.48
<8 3 6 0.49

Discussion

In studies which investigated the use of closed suction drains in TKA, no significant difference in the fall in haemoglobin between patients who had a closed suction drain and those who did not has been reported [1, 2, 68, 13, 14, 1719, 21]. These studies state that patients were transfused if their post-operative haemoglobin fell below a certain level, which is commonly between 8–10 g/dl; or if they were clinically symptomatic. Only four of these studies reported the number of patients that received a post-operative blood transfusion in each group [1, 8, 14, 18]. None of these studies distinguishes between which patients were transfused for clinical reasons and which were transfused when their haemoglobin fell below a certain trigger value. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude which patients actually needed a blood transfusion, and which patients were transfused arbitrarily. Using a pre-determined haemoglobin trigger factor to initiate transfusion can result in patients who are not clinically symptomatic being transfused. Our study shows that a closed suction drain does not significantly increase the transfusion rate of patients undergoing TKA if they are clinically assessed post operatively, which is contrary to the meta-analysis of Parker et al. [19].

Table 3 shows the number of patients in group 1 and group 2 that would have been transfused if arbitrary haemoglobin trigger values alone were used to initiate transfusion as in other studies. There is no significant difference in the number of patients that would have been transfused if various haemoglobin trigger factors alone were used to initiate transfusion.

It is not clear why more patients with drains were transfused in the reported studies. One can only postulate that combining clinical assessment and visualising approximately 500–1,000 ml of blood in a drain may indicate significant blood loss, thereby allowing for a potential tendency by medical staff to initiate transfusion. There are very few studies in the medical literature where patients following TKA have been given a blood transfusion according to clinical need alone. Our mean transfusion rate of 8% is comparable to that of Gainor whose transfusion rate was 6% in 115 consecutive TKAs, and to that of Mehra et al., whose transfusion rate was 6% in 50 patients [9, 15]. Some surgeons use re-infusion drains in TKA. Re-infusion drains used in primary TKA have been reported to significantly reduce allogenic blood transfusion requirements. Peter et al. reported an allogenic blood transfusion rate of 19% in 160 patients who underwent primary TKA and had a re-infusion drain [20]. In a similar study, Sinha et al. reported an allogenic transfusion rate of 16% [23]. Both these studies used haemoglobin trigger factors to initiate allogenic blood transfusion, which may have resulted in patients who were not clinically symptomatic being transfused.

Conclusion

This study showed that closed-suction drains do not significantly increase the risk of a post-operative blood transfusion in patients undergoing primary TKA for primary OA. To avoid unnecessary transfusion, patients should be assessed clinically, the post-operative haemoglobin value should be noted and blood transfusions should be given according to clinical need. It remains to be seen if re-infusion drains can significantly reduce post-operative blood transfusion, since studies which have reported that re-transfusion reduces allogenic blood-transfusion requirements, have also used haemoglobin trigger factors.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Adalberth G, Bystrom S, Kosltad K, Mallmin H, Milbrink J (1998) Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary. Acta Orthop Scand 69:475–478 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Ashraf T, Darmanis S, Krikler SJ (2001) Effectiveness of suction drainage after primary or revision total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 24:1158–1160 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Canty SJ, Shepard GJ, Ryan WG, Banks AJ (2003) Do we practice evidence based medicine with regard to drain usage in knee arthroplasty? Result of a questionnaire of BASK members. Knee 10:385–387 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.Chandratreya A, Giannikas K, Livesley P (1998) To drain or not to drain: literature review versus practice. J R Coll Surg Edinb 43:404–406 [PubMed]
  • 5.Cushner FD, Freidman RJ (1991) Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. CORR 269:98–101 [PubMed]
  • 6.Cobb JB (1990) Why use drains? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72-B 993–995 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Corpe RS, Gallentine J, Young TR, Steflik DE, Rectinwald J, Kusuma S (2000) Complications in total knee arthroplasty with and without surgical drainage. J South Orthop Assoc 9:207–212 [PubMed]
  • 8.Esler CAN, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ (2003) The use of a closed suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85-B:215–217 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Gainor JW (2000) Transfusion in unilateral knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 23:472–473 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Hadjinastassiou VG, Virich G, Lennox IA (2002) Use of the blood transfusion service in total knee replacement arthroplasty: the cost implications. Knee 9:145–148 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Hamer AJ, Dobson PMS, Earnshaw PH, Knowles S, Newman JH (2005) Blood conservation in elective orthopaedic surgery. British Orthopaedic Association, London
  • 12.Helm AT, Karksi MT, Parsons SJ, Sampath JS, Bale RS (2003) A strategy for reducing blood-transfusion requirements in elective orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85-B:484–489 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Holt BT, Parks NL, Engh GA, Lawrence JM (1997) Comparison of closed-suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 20:1121–1124 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Jenny J-Y, Boeri C, Lafare S (2001) No drainage does not increase complication risk after total knee prosthesis implantation: a prospective comparative randomised study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:299–301 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Mehra A, Murray J, de Alwis C (2004) A safe, simple and cost-effective protocol for blood transfusion in primary knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86:260–262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Mylod AG, France MP, Muser DE, Parsons R (1990) Peri-operative blood loss associated with total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72-A:1010–1012 [PubMed]
  • 17.Niskanen RO, Korkala OL, Haapala J, Kuokkanen HO, Kaukonen JP, Salo SA (2000) Drainage is of no use in primary uncomplicated cemented hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 15:567–569 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J, Menachem A, Dekel S (1997) Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:317–321 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Parker MJ, Roberts CP, Hay D (2004) Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:1146–1152 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Peter VK, Radford M, Matthews MG (2001) Re-transfusion of autologous blood from wound drains: the means for reducing transfusion requirements in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 8:321–323 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Ritter MA, Keating M, Faris PM (1994) Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76-A:35–38 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Salido JA, Marin LA, Gomez LA, Zorrilla P, Martinez C (2002) Pre-operative haemoglobin levels and the need for transfusion after prosthetic hip and knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A:216–220 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.Sinha A, Sinha M, Burgert S (2001) Re-infusion of drained blood as an alternative to homologous blood transfusion after total knee replacement. Int Orthop 25:257–259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Spencer J, Thomas SRYW, Yardy G, Mukundan C, Barrington R (2005) Are we overusing blood transfusing after elective joint replacement? A simple method to reduce the use of a scarce resource. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87:28–30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Thomas D, Wareham K, Cohen D, Hutchings H (2001) Autologous blood transfusion in total knee replacement surgery. Br J Anaesth 86:669–673 [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES