Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1):210–215. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000224323.53866.1E

A MODEL FOR THE PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CROUZON SYNDROME

Chad A Perlyn 1, Gillian Morriss-Kay 2, Tron Darvann 3, Marissa Tenenbaum 4, David M Ornitz 5
PMCID: PMC2267918  NIHMSID: NIHMS33097  PMID: 16823318

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Crouzon syndrome is caused by mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) leading to constitutive activation of receptors in the absence of ligand binding. The syndrome is characterized by premature fusion of the cranial sutures that leads to abnormal cranium shape, restricted brain growth, and increased intracranial pressure. Surgical remodeling of the cranial vault is currently used to treat affected infants. The purpose of this study was to develop a pharmacological strategy using tyrosine kinase inhibition as a novel treatment for craniosynostotic syndromes caused by constitutive FGFR activation.

METHODS

Characterization of cranial suture fusion in Fgfr2C342Y/+ mutant mice, which carry the most common Crouzon mutation, was performed using microcomputed tomographic analysis from embryogenesis through maturation. Whole calvarial cultures from wild-type and Fgfr2C342Y/+ mice were established and cultured for 2 weeks in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide control or PD173074, an FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Paraffin sections were prepared to show suture morphology and calcium deposition.

RESULTS

In untreated Fgfr2C342Y/+ cultures, the coronal suture fused bilaterally with loss of overlap between the frontal bone and parietal bone. Calvaria treated with PD173074 (2 µmol/L) showed patency of the coronal suture and were without evidence of any synostosis.

CONCLUSION

We report the successful use of PD173074 to prevent in vitro suture fusion in a model for Crouzon syndrome. Further studies are underway to develop an in vivo treatment protocol as a novel therapeutic modality for FGFR associated craniosynostotic syndromes.

Keywords: Craniosynostosis, Crouzon syndrome, Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2, PD173074, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor


Understanding the normal and abnormal molecular mechanisms of development and disease has become the defining theme of medicine in the 21st century. In the field of craniofacial surgery, genetic and developmental studies have elucidated the etiology of many common anomalies. One such set of conditions is faciocraniosynostoses, a group of closely related craniosynostotic syndromes caused by mutations in the genes encoding the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs). Crouzon syndrome was first described nearly 100 years ago when the triad of calvarial deformities, facial anomalies, and exophthalmos was noted in a mother and her son (10). The syndrome is autosomal dominant with an incidence of approximately 1:25,000 to 1:60,000 births (5, 7). Premature fusion of the cranial sutures is the hallmark of the condition, with craniosynostosis most commonly occurring at the coronal sutures bilaterally, resulting in a turribrachycephalic deformity. Fusion of the sagittal and lambdoid sutures is also noted frequently (11).

The molecular basis of Crouzon syndrome was identified in 1994 (22, 29). Reardon et al. (29) found single-stranded conformational polymorphism variations in exon 9 of FGFR2 in nine individuals with Crouzon syndrome. In five of the nine patients, a replacement of a cysteine in an immunoglobulin-like domain was seen. To date, more than 30 mutations have been found to cause Crouzon syndrome alone, most of which are localized to the immunoglobulin III domain of FGFR2 (6). Interestingly, identical mutations in the FGFR2 gene cause both Crouzon and Pfeiffer syndrome phenotypes (31). Pfeiffer syndrome also presents with craniosynostosis but can be differentiated from Crouzon syndrome clinically by broad, medially deviated great toes and thumbs with or without syndactyly (28).

FGFR2 is one of four signaling FGFRs belonging to the receptor tyrosine kinase family (15). Mutations in FGFRs lead to abnormal cell signaling through one of three mechanisms: 1) increased receptor signaling caused by increased ligand affinity (1, 2, 36); 2) activation by removal of inhibition by an activating loop in the kinase domain (33); or 3) receptor dimerization by unpaired cysteines, leading to constitutive receptor activation in the absence of ligand binding (9, 25, 35). Trans-membrane hydrogen bonding also has been reported (35). In Crouzon and, in many cases, Pfeiffer syndromes, the mechanism of increased receptor activation is via receptor dimerization by unpaired cysteines (21).

To understand the biological effects of FGFR2 hyperactivation, Iseki et al. (16) placed fibroblast growth factor 2-soaked beads over the developing coronal suture in mice using an ex utero technique. This demonstrated that excessive fibroblast growth factor-FGFR interaction leads to down-regulation of Fgfr2 and up-regulation of osteopontin, a marker for differentiation (16, 17). To further explore the effects of constitutive activation of FGFR2 on craniofacial growth, Eswarakumar et al. (13) created a Crouzon/Pfeiffer syndrome mouse. The model was made using site-directed mutagenesis in which the Cys342 “TGC” was changed to “TAC” on a Fgfr2 genomic fragment containing exon 9. The mutation represents the most commonly encountered mutation in individuals with Crouzon syndrome. Fgfr2C342Y/+ mice are born viable, and as growth progresses, they develop a rounded calvaria, proptotic eyes, and shortened midface (13, 26). Fusion of the coronal sutures occurs bilaterally, with partial to complete fusion of the sagittal and lambdoid sutures also occurring. Low levels of FGFR2 have been confirmed in fused cranial sutures from human patients with Crouzon syndrome (3). In the developing suture, down-regulation of Fgfr2 after stimulation in FGF2 has been correlated with a decrease in cell proliferation and, interestingly, an up-regulation of Fgfr1, leading to enhanced differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells (13, 17). This drive toward osteogenic differentiation in the uncommitted cells of the suture has been implicated as the mechanism behind the abnormal suture fusion that defines the craniosynostotic conditions (24, 35).

Current management of infants born with syndromic craniosynostis is based on surgical remodeling of the fronto-orbital region to prevent functional disturbances and enable normal development and shape of the cranium (30). In addition, midface advancement, whether by conventional techniques or distraction osteogenesis, may be required to treat the hypoplastic midface. The development of the Fgfr2C342Y/+ mouse, however, has led to our ability to investigate nonsurgical interventions that may prevent suture fusion and normalize craniofacial growth in Crouzon/Pfeiffer syndrome. PD173074, a pyrido-[2,3–d]pyrimidine, is a selective FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (23). On the basis of our understanding of altered suture biology, we hypothesized that the use of PD173074 could mitigate the biochemical effects of the Crouzon/Pfeiffer mutation by attenuating the drive toward premature differentiation seen in the osteoprogenitor cell population of affected cranial sutures. The purpose of this study was to develop a pharmacological strategy using tyrosine kinase inhibition as a novel treatment for craniosynostotic syndromes caused by constitutive FGFR activation.

METHODS

Animals

Fgfr2C342Y/+ mutant mice were a gift of the late Professor Peter Lonai (Weizmann Institute, Israel) and were constructed as described by Eswarakumar et al. (13). All procedures were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Studies Committee of the Washington University School of Medicine. Male mice that were heterozygous for the Fgfr2C342Y mutation were bred with CD1 wild-type (WT) females. Timing of the embryos was by the vaginal plug method, with 12:00 noon on the day on which the plug was observed referred to as 0.5 days past coitum. The WT versus mutant genotype was determined with polymerase chain reaction amplification of the WT and mutant allele.

Micro-computed Tomography

For three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) scanning, 5WT and 5 Fgfr2C342Y/+ specimens were obtained at the following stages of development: embryonic Day (E) 17.5, postnatal day (P)1, P14, P28, and P42. They were then sealed in conical tubes and shipped to the MicroCT imaging facility at the University of Utah. The use of MicroCT for analysis of mutant mouse models is established (14). We also have validated data from MicroCT scans of Fgfr2C342Y/+ specimens by comparison with skeletal preparations (26). Images were obtained at 32 µm resolution using a General Electric Medical Systems EVS-RS9 MicroCT scanner (Chalfont St. Giles, England). Image data then were sent to the Craniofacial Imaging Laboratory (27) at the St. Louis Children’s Hospital and to the 3D Imaging Laboratory at the University of Copenhagen School of Dentistry and processed using contemporary medical imaging software for analyses of the craniofacial skeleton.

Calvarial Culture System

Pregnant females at E 18.0 were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation, and embryos were dissected from the uterus under sterile conditions. With the aid of the dissecting microscope, the skin was removed from the overlying cranium, and a circumferential incision was made to carefully remove the calvarium. The brain was then removed, leaving the dura adherent to the calvarium. Each calvarium was placed into a well of a culture plate over a 400 µl mound of Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) placed at the bottom of each well. This allowed the calvarium to maintain its shape and remain above the plate bottom. Calvaria were cultured for 2 weeks in 1 ml of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml ascorbic acid, 1% penicillin/streptomycin/ amphotericin, and 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, in an incubator at 37°C in a 95% air/5% CO2 environment. The medium was changed every 48 hours. After it was established that the timing and pattern of suture fusion in the mice calvaria cultures was consistent with the in vivo patterns of suture fusion seen by MicroCT, the efficacy of PD173074 (courtesy of Pfizer, Morris Plains, NJ) to prevent suture fusion was tested. The experiment was repeated in triplicate with three specimens per group. Group 1 consisted of WT specimens treated with 0.3% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) carrier. Group 2 contained WT specimens treated with 2 µmol/L PD173074 dissolved in DMSO. Group 3 contained Fgfr2C342Y/+ specimens treated with 0.3% DMSO. Group 4 contained Fgfr2C342Y/+ specimens treated with 2 µmol/L PD173074 in DMSO. After 14 days in culture, calvaria were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, and paraffin sections were prepared and stained with Mallory’s trichrome and von Kossa stain to show suture morphology and calcium deposition.

RESULTS

Suture Morphology

Patterns of craniofacial dysmorphology were examined from an embryonic stage (E 17.5) through maturation (6 wk) using two- and three-dimensional (3-D) MicroCT. Fgfr2C342Y/+ mice showed a craniofacial phenotype very similar to that of affected humans, with complete fusion of the coronal sutures and varying degrees of lambdoid and sagittal suture fusion (Fig. 1). Midface hypoplasia and a Class III malocclusion also was present. As shown in Figure 2, the brachycephaly associated with the Crouzon phenotype was not readily apparent until 2 weeks of age. This change in head shape was found to correlate with fusion of the calvarial sutures, particularly the coronal sutures. Cranial sutures were present just before birth and patent in all specimens. There was no evidence of agenesis of any suture (Fig. 3). No complete suture fusion was found in any specimen before the 2-week-old stage. However, at the 2-week-old stage, coronal suture fusion was noted in all specimens. This indicates that in Fgfr2C342Y/+ mice, a postnatal window of opportunity exists in which the sutures remain patent, and pharmacological therapy could have a preventative effect.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A, 3-D CT scan of a normal infant showing unfused coronal suture (C). B, 3-D CT scan of an infant with Crouzon syndrome showing fused coronal suture with visible ridging (arrow), abnormal head shape (brachycephaly), and midface hypoplasia. C, 3-D CT scan of a 6-week-old wild-type (WT) mouse showing unfused coronal (C), sagittal (S), and lambdoid (L) sutures. D, –D CT scan of a 6-week-old Fgfr2C342Y/+ mouse showing craniosynostosis of coronal and sagittal sutures. The lambdoid sutures remain open. E, sagittal section of two-dimensional CT showing patency of coronal suture in WT mice (inset). F, similar view of Fgfr2C342Y/+ mouse illustrating the fusion of the coronal suture (inset).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Timeline of craniofacial dysmorphology of Fgfr2C342Y/+ mice. Brachycephalic appearance does not appear until 2 weeks of age, which correlates with the fusion of the coronal sutures in Fgfr2C342Y/+ mice.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Patency of the coronal sutures at E18.5, just before birth. A, wild-type specimen. B, Fgfr2C342Y/+ specimen. The image is inverted surface reconstruction of 3-D CT data. The coronal suture is indicated by an asterisk between the frontal bone (F) and parietal bone (P).

Pharmacological Inhibition of FGFR In Vitro

To assess the effects of FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition on postnatal suture fusion in Fgfr2C342Y/+ mice, the kinase inhibitor PD173074 was used to treat cultured calvarial complexes (osseous calvarium plus dura). Changes in suture morphology and patency was compared in untreated calvaria and calvaria treated with the inhibitor to identify a therapeutic response. In WT cultures, a normal overlap between the frontal bone and the parietal bone was seen at the site of the coronal suture, with no evidence of suture fusion (Fig. 4). In untreated Fgfr2C342Y/+ specimens, the coronal suture could not be visualized because synostosis of the frontal and parietal bone resulted in the loss of any discernable suture. However, calvaria treated with PD173074 (2 µmol/L) showed patency of the coronal suture and was without evidence of synostosis (Fig. 4). The normal overlap between the frontal bone and the parietal bone remained intact, although there appeared to be some blunting of the bones at their overlapping edges. The overall size and shape of the calvarium was unchanged from WT controls. There was no effect of the drug or DMSO carrier on the sutures of WT specimens. (Fig. 5)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

von Kossa staining showing calcium deposition in sagittal sections through calvarial cultures. A, WT mouse calvarium after 14 days in culture. The line indicates the plane of section for B to D (scale bar = 2.0 mm). B, WT coronal suture after 14 days in culture. The normal overlap of frontal and parietal bones is seen with patency of the suture. C, fused coronal suture in Fgfr2C342Y/+ specimen treated with DMSO control. Note the ridging of the bone, which is similar to that shown in Figure 1B (black arrow). D, treatment of Fgfr2C342Y/+ calvarium with PD173074 prevents suture fusion (gray arrow) (scale bar = 300 µm).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Normal suture development is regulated in part by FGFRs that control proliferation-differentiation rate of osteogenic stem cells (A). In Crouzon syndrome, activation of FGFR2 leads to acceleration of differentiation process with loss of proliferating stem cells at the suture front and subsequent suture fusion (B). Treatment with PD173074 prevents abnormal suture obliteration.

DISCUSSION

We report the successful use of PD173074 to prevent suture fusion in a model for Crouzon syndrome. PD173074 exhibits a high degree of complementarity with the tyrosine kinase domain of the FGFR tyrosine kinase domain, particularly FGFR1 (23). PD173074 has been used successfully to inhibit ectopic or excessive FGFR signaling in other human diseases, including thyroid carcinoma, myeloma, breast cancer, and as an antiangiogenic agent for tumor chemotherapy (12, 18, 32, 34). At first glance, use of an FGFR inhibitor appears paradoxical, given the down-regulation of FGFR2 demonstrated in human and murine experiments (3, 13, 16). However, our intention in developing this therapy was to attenuate the premature differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells at the leading bone edges (i.e., the cranial sutures), which has been correlated with concurrent up-regulation of Fgfr1 (19). Further investigation into the specific mechanism of PD173074 on suture patency currently is underway in our laboratory.

Given the results of these calvarial culture studies, we know that pharmacological inhibition of suture fusion is possible in a murine model for Crouzon and Pfeiffer syndromes. This poses several questions that must be addressed. Will this compound be effective in an in vivo application when given to live mice with the Crouzon mutation? Can it be given prenatally? What will be the best mechanism of drug delivery to maximize therapeutic effectiveness and limit potential side effects? Is there a role for limited usage, such as directly applying the compound to the sutures via a controlled release system? Last, and perhaps most critical, is this a realistic therapy for human infants affected with FGFR-associated syndromic craniosynostosis? The basis of this question lies in the timing of premature suture fusion in humans, which traditionally has been considered a prenatal event because infants are diagnosed during early infancy. However, multiple reports exist describing patients in which the Crouzon syndrome calvarial phenotype developed during early infancy (4, 8, 11). In these cases of progressive postnatal craniosynostosis, infants develop the midface characteristics of Crouzon syndrome soon after birth but show delayed, progressive craniosynostosis and increased intracranial pressure. In this subtype of patients, pharmacological intervention certainly could have a beneficial outcome. As for those patients diagnosed with the condition at or shortly after birth, perhaps a drug such as PD173074 could be used as an adjuvant to surgical therapy by preventing further suture fusion of the vault, endocranial base, and midface. This may reduce the growth disturbances seen with the syndrome and limit the frequency or invasiveness of surgical interventions. In addition, sonographic features of Crouzon syndrome are readily apparent during prenatal ultrasound (20) and perhaps initiation of FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition at this early stage could further improve outcomes. These will be difficult questions to answer but well worthwhile, given the limited alternatives for treatment currently in practice.

In conclusion, we report the successful use of an FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor to prevent suture fusion in a mouse model for Crouzon and Pfeiffer syndromes. Further work will elucidate the molecular effects of this compound on suture behavior and move toward the development of a possible therapeutic intervention for humans affected with these conditions.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by an American College of Surgeons Research Fellowship, a FreshStart Surgical Gifts/Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation grant, and NIH Grant R01 HD39952.

Contributor Information

Chad A. Perlyn, Division of Plastic Surgery and Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Gillian Morriss-Kay, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England

Tron Darvann, 3D Imaging Laboratory, School of Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Marissa Tenenbaum, Division of Plastic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

David M. Ornitz, Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, St. Louis, Missouri

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anderson J, Burns HD, Enriquez-Harris P, Wilkie AO, Heath JK. Apert syndrome mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 exhibit increased affinity for FGF ligand. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:1475–1483. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.9.1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bellus GA, Gaudenz K, Zackai EH, Clarke LA, Szabo J, Francomano CA, Muenke M. Identical mutations in three different fibroblast growth factor receptor genes in autosomal dominant craniosynostosis syndromes. Nat Genet. 1996;14:174–176. doi: 10.1038/ng1096-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bresnick S, Schendel S. Crouzon's disease correlates with low fibroblastic growth factor receptor activity in stenosed cranial sutures. J Craniofac Surg. 1995;6:245–248. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199505000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buchman SR, Muraszko KM. Syndromic craniosynostosis. In: Lin KY, Ogle RC, Jane JA, editors. Craniofacial Surgery: Science and Surgical Technique. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2002. pp. 252–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohen MM., Jr Craniosynostosis and syndromes with craniosynostosis: Incidence, genetics, penetrance, variability, and new syndrome updating. Birth Defects. 1979;15:13–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cohen MM., Jr . Fgfs/FGFRs and associated disorders. In: Epstein CJ, Erickson RP, Wynshaw-Boris A, editors. Inborn Errors of Development: The Molecular Basis of Clinical Disorders of Morphogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 380–400. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cohen MM, Jr, Kreiborg S. Birth prevalence studies of the Crouzon syndrome: Comparison of direct and indirect methods. Clin Genet. 1992;41:12–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1992.tb03620.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Connolly JP, Gruss J, Seto ML, Whelan MF, Ellenbogen R, Weiss A, Buchman SR, Cunningham ML. Progressive postnatal craniosynostosis and increased intracranial pressure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1313–1323. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000111593.96440.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cornejo-Roldan LR, Roessler E, Muenke M. Analysis of the mutational spectrum of the FGFR2 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome. Hum Genet. 1999;104:425–431. doi: 10.1007/s004390050979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crouzon O. Hereditary craniofacial dysostosis [in French] Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris. 1912;33:545. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.David JD, Poswillo D, Simpson D. The Craniosynostoses: Causes, Natural History, and Management. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1982. pp. 185–228. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dimitroff CJ, Klohs W, Sharma A, Pera P, Driscoll D, Veith J, Steinkampf R, Schroeder M, Klutchko S, Sumlin A, Henderson B, Dougherty TJ, Bernacki RJ. Anti-angiogenic activity of selected receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, PD166285 and PD173074: Implications for combination treatment with photodynamic therapy. Invest New Drugs. 1999;17:121–135. doi: 10.1023/a:1006367032156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eswarakumar VP, Horowitz MC, Locklin R, Morriss-Kay GM, Lonai P. A gain-of-function mutation of Fgfr2c demonstrates the roles of this receptorvariant in osteogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12555–12560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405031101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ford-Hutchinson AF, Cooper DM, Hallgrimsson B, Jirik FR. Imaging skeletal pathology in mutant mice by microcomputed tomography. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:2659–2665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hunter T. Signaling: 2000 and beyond. Cell. 2000;100:113–127. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81688-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iseki S, Wilkie AO, Heath JK, Ishimaru T, Eto K, Morriss-Kay GM. Fgfr2 and osteopontin domains in the developing skull vault are mutually exclusive and can be altered by locally applied FGF2. Development. 1997;124:3375–3384. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.17.3375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iseki S, Wilkie AO, Morriss-kay GM. Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 have distinct differentiation- and proliferation-related roles in the developing mouse skull vault. Development. 1999;126:5611–5620. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.24.5611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koziczak M, Holbro T, Hynes NE. Blocking of FGFR signaling inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation through downregulation of D-type cyclins. Oncogene. 2004;23:3501–3508. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kress W, Collmann H, Busse M, Halliger-Keller B, Mueller CR. Clustering of FGFR2 gene mutations inpatients with Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndromes(FGFR2-associated craniosynostoses) Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;91:134–137. doi: 10.1159/000056833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leo MV, Suslak L, Ganesh VL, Adhate A, Apuzzio JJ. Crouzon syndrome: Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis by binocular diameters. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:906–908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mangasarian K, Li Y, Mansukhani A, Basilico C. Mutation associated with Crouzon syndrome causes ligand-independent dimerization and activation of FGF receptor-2. J Cell Physiol. 1997;172:117–125. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199707)172:1<117::AID-JCP13>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meyers GA, Day D, Goldberg R, Daentl DL, Przylepa KA, Abrams LJ, Graham JR, Jr, Feingold M, Moeschler JB, Rawnsley E, Scott AF, Jabs EW. FGFR2 exon IIIa and IIIc mutations in Crouzon, Jackson-Weiss, and Pfeiffer syndromes: Evidence for missense changes, insertions, and a deletion due to alternative RNA splicing. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:491–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mohammadi M, Froum S, Hamby JM, Schroeder MC, Panek RL, Lu GH, Eliseenkova AV, Green D, Schlessinger J, Hubbard SR. Crystal structure of an angiogenesis inhibitor bound to the FGF receptor tyrosine kinase domain. EMBO J. 1998;17:5896–5904. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.20.5896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morriss-Kay GM, Wilkie AO. Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: Insights from human genetics and experimental studies. J Anat. 2005;207:637–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00475.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oldridge M, Wilkie AO, Slaney SF, Poole MD, Pulleyn LJ, Rutland P, Hockley AD, Wake MJ, Goldin JH, Winter RM. Mutations in the third immunoglobulin domain of the fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 gene in Crouzon syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:1077–1082. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.6.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Perlyn CA, DeLeon VB, Babbs C, Govier D, Burell L, Darvann T, Kreiborg S, Morriss-Kay GM. The craniofacial phenotype of the Crouzon mouse: Analysis of a model for syndromic craniosynostosis using 3D MicroCT. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. doi: 10.1597/05-212. (in press) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Perlyn CA, Marsh JL, Vannier MW, Kane AA, Koppel P, Clark KW, Christensen GE, Knapp R, Lo LJ, Govier D. The craniofacial anomalies archive at St. Louis Children's Hospital: 20 years of craniofacial imaging experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1862–1870. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pfeiffer RA. Dominant hereditary acrocephalosyndactylia [in German] Kinderheilkd. 1964;90:301–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Reardon W, Winter RM, Rutland P, Pulleyn LJ, Jones BM, Malcolm S. Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene cause Crouzon syndrome. Nat Genet. 1994;8:98–103. doi: 10.1038/ng0994-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Renier D, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D. Management of craniosynostoses. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000;16:645–658. doi: 10.1007/s003810000320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rutland P, Pulleyn LJ, Reardon W, Baraitser M, Hayward R, Jones B, Malcolm S, Winter RM, Oldridge M, Slaney SF, Poole MD, Wilkie AO. Identical mutations in the FGFR2 gene cause both Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndrome phenotypes. Nat Genet. 1995;9:173–176. doi: 10.1038/ng0295-173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.St Bernard R, Zheng L, Liu W, Winer D, Asa SL, Ezzat S. Fibroblast growth factor receptors as molecular targets in thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinology. 2005;146:1145–1153. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tavormina PL, Shiang R, Thompson LM, Zhu YZ, Wilkin DJ, Lachman RS, Wilcox WR, Rimoin DL, Cohn DH, Wasmuth JJ. Thanatophoric dysplasia (types I and II) caused by distinct mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Nat Genet. 1995;9:321–328. doi: 10.1038/ng0395-321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Trudel S, Ely S, Farooqi Y, Affer M, Robbiani DF, Chesi M, Bergsagel PL. Inhibition of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 induces differentiation and apoptosis in t(4;14) myeloma. Blood. 2004;103:3521–3528. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wilke AO. Craniosynostosis: Genes and mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:1647–1656. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.10.1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu K, Herr AB, Waksman G, Ornitz DM. Loss of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ligand-binding specificity in Apert syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:14536–14541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1):210–215.

COMMENTS


Perlyn et al. have published a very thoughtful and important article on a proposed pharmacological treatment of Crouzon syndrome. First, their experimental methods were quite clever. They wisely used the Fgfr2C342Y/+ mutant mice, which may simply be the best animal model to study syndromic craniosynostosis. This is because the Ig III domain (exon 9) of FGFR2 has been implicated as one of the major causes of cranio-synostoses, such as Crouzon and Pfeiffer syndromes. This mouse develops the phenotypical characteristics of Crouzon syndrome, presumably due to the same enhanced differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells caused by the FGFR2 mutation. It is a model in which pharmacological (i.e., non-surgical) interventions could be executed to see if the sutures can be prevented from fusing. Thus, the scientists used tyrosine kinase inhibition (PD173074) to prevent a population of osteogenic cells from developing, which would normally form abnormal bone across the normal sutures. This is Step 1 and is potentially wonderful news for a novel treatment of an excellent murine in vitro model. However, what about humans? Will this approach be successful in making the murine to man jump that has confounded so many other pharmacological treatments for other diseases? These syndromic syndromes are presumably a prenatal event. Can we detect these mutations in utero in humans and then subsequently vitiate the biochemical effects of this mutation? Does PD 173074 have deleterious effects on the developing bone in other parts of the body and cranium when ingested or injected? The surgery for craniosynostosis is fairly well developed and safe, but can we prevent the progressive nature and intracranial pressure issues related to syndromic craniosynostosis through this sort of approach? These are all provocative questions that are now possible to contemplate, in part, thanks to the exciting work and novel findings presented in this study.

  • Richard G. Ellenbogen

  • Seattle, Washington

The concept of treating syndromic synostosis by pharmacological means is intriguing. Building on previous investigations by themselves and others concerning the genetic and biochemical basis of suture fusion, the authors have taken the first tentative steps in this direction. There are clearly many substantial obstacles in the way of arriving at a practical therapy in humans, but the authors are to be commended for their sophisticated efforts toward achieving that goal.

  • Paul H. Chapman

  • Boston, Massachusetts

This very innovative study describes a potential application of molecular biology to neurosurgery. The authors have incubated cultures of calvarium and cranial sutures in a mouse model of Crouzon syndrome. If the gene defect is corrected by adding a fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, the sutures remain open.

Obviously, this is a long way from clinical application. Nonetheless, this could find applications for patients with a fetal diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome and related syndromic forms of craniofacial dysostosis and, possibly, in operated patients in whom resynostosis is a problem.

  • Leslie N. Sutton

  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

RESOURCES