Abstract
We combined gene divergence data, classical genetics, and phylogenetics to study the evolution of the mating-type chromosome in the filamentous ascomycete Neurospora tetrasperma. In this species, a large non-recombining region of the mating-type chromosome is associated with a unique fungal life cycle where self-fertility is enforced by maintenance of a constant state of heterokaryosis. Sequence divergence between alleles of 35 genes from the two single mating-type component strains (i.e. the homokaryotic mat A or mat a-strains), derived from one N. tetrasperma heterokaryon (mat A+mat a), was analyzed. By this approach we were able to identify the boundaries and size of the non-recombining region, and reveal insight into the history of recombination cessation. The non-recombining region covers almost 7 Mbp, over 75% of the chromosome, and we hypothesize that the evolution of the mating-type chromosome in this lineage involved two successive events. The first event was contemporaneous with the split of N. tetrasperma from a common ancestor with its outcrossing relative N. crassa and suppressed recombination over at least 6.6 Mbp, and the second was confined to a smaller region in which recombination ceased more recently. In spite of the early origin of the first “evolutionary stratum”, genealogies of five genes from strains belonging to an additional N. tetrasperma lineage indicate independent initiations of suppressed recombination in different phylogenetic lineages. This study highlights the shared features between the sex chromosomes found in the animal and plant kingdoms and the fungal mating-type chromosome, despite fungi having no separate sexes. As is often found in sex chromosomes of plants and animals, recombination suppression of the mating-type chromosome of N. tetrasperma involved more than one evolutionary event, covers the majority of the mating-type chromosome and is flanked by distal regions with obligate crossovers.
Author Summary
In fungi, mating occurs between individuals of alternative mating-types and there is no dichotomy of individuals into two morphologically different sexes. Nevertheless, in this paper we show that chromosomal regions controlling mating-type identity in fungi share features with the more complex sex chromosomes found in the other eukaryote kingdoms. We have specifically studied the mating-type chromosome in an emerging model-species of filamentous ascomycetes, Neurospora tetrasperma, and show that it resembles the sex chromosomes of animals and plants both in failing to recombine with its homologous chromosome over the majority of its length, and having obligate crossovers at the flanking “pseudoautosomal” regions. Furthermore, our data indicate that the evolution of the mating-type chromosome in this species involved more than one successive evolutionary event, each defining an “evolutionary stratum”, a term initially introduced by to represent different sequential steps whereby recombination became arrested between the proto-sex chromosomes in humans. We argue that insight into the evolution of chromosomal sex determination can be gained through the study of alternative, simple, systems, such as N. tetrasperma, in which the genomic consequences of reduced recombination per se can be disentangled from sex-biased evolutionary forces such as male-biased mutation and dispersal.
Introduction
Many diverse systems for sex determination have evolved in plants and animals [1]–[3]. One involves physically distinct sex chromosomes, a system thought to have evolved independently many times by suppression of recombination around the sex determination genes, followed by differentiation and degeneration of the non-recombining chromosome [4]. In the fungal kingdom, there is no dichotomy of individuals into sexes bearing different gametes, but instead mating-type identity is determined by inheritance of alleles at mating-type loci. Nevertheless, chromosomal regions controlling mating-type identity in fungi share features with the more complex sex chromosomes of algae, plants and animals [5]. Although mating-type loci consist of one to a few linked genes, and are thus limited to a small genomic region, alleles at the mating-type loci of fungi often differ to the extent that there is no sequence similarity between them [e.g. 6],[7]. Furthermore, complete recombination cessation in the region around the mating-type loci have been reported from several fungal taxa [7]–[9]. However, fungi generally have much smaller regions of suppressed recombination than animal dimorphic chromosomal regions. For example, in Cryptococcus neoformans recombination is suppressed on only 6% of a 1.8 Mb chromosome, or ca. 100 kb [8].
The filamentous ascomycete Neurospora tetrasperma constitutes an exception in which recombination is blocked over the majority of the chromosome containing the mating-type loci, referred to as the mating-type (mat) chromosome. Moreover, the non-recombining region is flanked by distal regions where obligate crossovers are observed [10],[11]. In this species, the large non-recombining region is associated with a uniquely fungal life cycle, called pseudohomothallism, where self-fertility is enforced by maintenance of a constant state of heterokaryosis, normally only observed post-fertilization in this group of fungi. Modified programs of meiosis and sexual spore development lead to the packaging of two haploid nuclei of opposite mating-type (mat A and mat a) into each N. tetrasperma ascospore progeny [12],[13]. The species maintains its ability to outcross by the occasional production of homokaryotic, self-sterile (mat A or mat a) propagules, both asexual and sexual, which may be isolated to obtain single mating-type component strains. A key feature of meiosis in N. tetrasperma is suppressed crossing over on the mating-type bivalent, ensuring that mat A and mat a will segregate in the first division of meiosis. Although suppressed recombination between mat and the centromere would suffice to provide the mechanism for segregation of mating type, the non-recombining region covers a much larger area of the chromosome [10]. The mating-type chromosomes of N. tetrasperma therefore resemble the sex chromosomes of animals and plants both in failing to recombine over the majority of their length and having obligate crossovers at the flanking “pseudoautosomal” regions. However, the mechanism initiating the divergence of mating-type chromosomes in N. tetrasperma differs from that of animal and plant sex chromosomes, where initiation is suggested to be due to selection for linkage between primary sex-determining alleles and other interacting genes. Such interactions involve alleles with beneficial effects in one sex, but which reduce the fitness of the other sex (e.g. sexually antagonistic genes, [4] and references therein).
Two factors have been suggested to affect recombination between evolving sex chromosomes: the spread of genetic modifiers of recombination rates [14], and chromosomal rearrangements causing chromosome heteromorphism [4]. Both these factors have been suggested to be responsible for the blocked recombination in N. tetrasperma. Reciprocal introgression of the mating-type chromosomes between N. tetrasperma and its close relative N. crassa indicate that both autosomal genes and structural heterozygosity affect recombination in this species [11].
By investigating nucleotide sequence divergence of genes shared between homologous non-recombining chromosomes, insight can be gained into when and how recombination ceased between them, assuming they have been evolving independently since recombination was disrupted. This approach has been used for several systems, including X–Y gametologs of humans [15], mouse [16], dioecious plants [17], W–Z gametologs of chicken [18], and genes located on the mating-type chromosomes of the basidiomycete Cryptococcus [19]. All of these systems exhibit “evolutionary strata”, the term initially introduced by Lahn and Page [15] to represent different sequential steps whereby recombination become arrested between the proto-sex chromosomes.
In this study, we compared the level of divergence between alleles on mat A and mat a-chromosomes from a single wild-type N. tetrasperma heterokaryon and found that evolution of the mating-type chromosome in this lineage involved two successive events. The first suppressed recombination over a very large region-at least 6.6 Mbp, or 75% of the chromosome, and was contemporaneous with the split of N. tetrasperma from a common ancestor with the outcrossing relative N. crassa. The second was confined to a smaller region in which recombination ceased more recently. In spite of the early origin of the first stratum, genealogies of five genes located in this region from strains belonging to an additional N. tetrasperma phylogenetic lineage indicate totally independent initiations of recombination suppression in the two lineages. We hypothesize that pseudohomothallism in N. tetrasperma evolved in a stepwise manner, and that the steps required to block recombination along the mat-chromosome occurred independently in the different lineages in order to facilitate a more efficient first division meiotic segregation of mating type.
Results
Allele Divergence of Single Mating-Type Component Strains Originating from the Heterokaryon P581
In order to relate the divergence and evolutionary constraints of alleles within a heterokaryon to the location in the genome, the synonymous (d S) and non-synonymous to synonymous (d N/d S) nucleotide divergence values were estimated for 35 allele pairs of genes of the single mating-type component strains (i.e. homokaryotic mat A or mat a-strains) originating from the heterokaryotic (mat A+mat a) strain P581 of N. tetrasperma (Table 1). In addition, divergence values (d S and d N/d S) were estimated between each N. tetrasperma allele and the homologous allele of N. crassa (http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/genome/neurospora/).
Table 1. Fungal Material of N. tetrasperma and N. crassa used in the Study.
Strain1 | Mating type | ||
Wild-type strains of N. tetrasperma | Geographic origin | ||
Heterokaryon | Homokaryon2 | ||
Lineage 1 | |||
P581 | FGSC 2508 | A | Lihue, Hawaii |
FGSC 2509 | a | Lihue, Hawaii | |
P556 | FGSC 2510 | A | Hanalei, Hawaii |
FGSC 2511 | a | Hanalei, Hawaii | |
P2361 | P4371 | A | Ahipara, New Zealand |
P4372 | a | Ahipara, New Zealand | |
Lineage 2 | |||
P505 | FGSC2503 | A | Welsh, Louisiana |
FGSC 2504 | a | Welsh, Louisiana | |
P510 | FGSC 9051 | A | Welsh, Louisiana |
FGSC 9052 | a | Welsh, Louisiana | |
P4460 | FGSC 9030 | A | Franklin, Louisiana |
FGSC 9031 | a | Franklin, Louisiana | |
Manipulated strains3 | Description | ||
FGSC3789A | A | N. crassa ro-10 al-2 un-18 | |
DJ1544-2a | a | Sixth backcross of the mat a-chromosome from FGSC 2509 into N. crassa |
FGSC = The Fungal Genetics Stock Center. P = accession number from the Perkins collection of Neurospora from nature now curated by FGSC. Lineages are according to the phylogeny of Saenz et al [20].
Homokaryons are single mating-type components of the heterokaryons in the left column.
See [11] for a description.
Because of the self-fertilizing nature of the species, genes outside of the regions of blocked recombination are expected to be largely identical between single mating-type component strains isolated from wild heterokaryons. Accordingly, no sequence divergence was found between allele pairs from the single mating-type component strains (i.e. d S = 0) of eight genes located at both ends of mat chromosome, indicating homogenization of genes in these two distal regions by recombination (Table 2). The region between mus-42 and lys-3, which will hereafter be referred to as the non-recombining part of the mat chromosome, in contrast contained 15 divergent allele pairs with d S-values ranging from 0.013 to 0.082. No divergence was found for two additional genes in this region (rid and cys-5). The d S-values of the genes in the non-recombining region, but on either side of mat, were found to be significantly different (Mann-Whitney test, p<0.0015); to the right of mat, d S ranged from 0.047 to 0.082, while d S ranged from 0 to 0.04 on the left side of mat (Table 2). This difference was significant even when excluding the two non-divergent genes on the left flank (rid and cys-5; Mann-Whitney test, p<0.0058). Taken together, our data indicate that the evolution of the mating-type chromosome in this lineage involved at least two events, dividing recombination suppression into two strata. The first, larger Stratum 1 includes mat, the centromere and the majority of the right arm of the chromosome, and the second, smaller Stratum 2 is restricted to the area left of mat (Figure 1A).
Table 2. Sequence Divergence between Alleles of Single Mating-Type Component Strains of the Heterokaryotic N. tetrasperma Strain P581 (AT-aT ) and between each of the Mating-Type Strains and the N. crassa Genome Sequence (AT-Nc; aT-Nc).
Linkage group/region | Locus | Sequence compared (bp) | d S | d N/d S | |||||||
AT-aT | SE | AT-Nc | SE | aT-Nc | SE | AT-aT | AT-Nc | aT-Nc | |||
LGI | |||||||||||
Pseudoautosomal | ro-10 | 603 | 0 | 0 | 0.097 | 0.026 | 0.097 | 0.026 | - | 0.093 | 0.093 |
nit-2 | 3102 | 0 | 0 | 0.056 | 0.009 | 0.056 | 0.009 | - | 0.099 | 0.099 | |
krev-1 | 551 | 0 | 0 | 0.095 | 0.028 | 0.095 | 0.028 | - | 0.089 | 0.089 | |
sod-1 | 465 | 0 | 0 | 0.071 | 0.026 | 0.071 | 0.026 | - | 0.041 | 0.041 | |
Stratum 2 | mus-42 | 2972 | 0.013 | 0.004 | 0.117 | 0.014 | 0.119 | 0.014 | 0.105 | 0.235 | 0.224 |
rid | 2342 | 0 | 0 | 0.158 | 0.018 | 0.158 | 0.018 | - | 0.194 | 0.194 | |
leu-4 | 1838 | 0.028 | 0.008 | 0.067 | 0.013 | 0.057 | 0.012 | 0.05 | 0.054 | 0.063 | |
cys-5 | 870 | 0 | 0 | 0.035 | 0.013 | 0.035 | 0.013 | - | 0 | 0 | |
ser-3 | 1084 | 0.04 | 0.012 | 0.082 | 0.018 | 0.078 | 0.017 | 0.188 | 0.046 | 0.049 | |
tef-1 | 470 | 0.029 | 0.017 | 0.049 | 0.022 | 0.059 | 0.024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
un-3 | 1095 | 0.04 | 0.013 | 0.057 | 0.015 | 0.040 | 0.013 | 0.06 | 0.042 | 0.060 | |
mat | |||||||||||
Stratum 1 | aut1 | 898 | 0.055 | 0.017 | 0.024 | 0.011 | 0.050 | 0.016 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
upr-1 | 4959 | 0.056 | 0.007 | 0.067 | 0.008 | 0.071 | 0.008 | 0.264 | 0.349 | 0.327 | |
erg-8 | 1410 | 0.060 | 0.014 | 0.077 | 0.016 | 0.077 | 0.016 | 0.046 | 0.012 | 0.023 | |
arg-1 | 1117 | 0.047 | 0.014 | 0.023 | 0.010 | 0.039 | 0.012 | 0.025 | 0 | 0.031 | |
eth-1 | 866 | 0.029 | 0.012 | 0.064 | 0.018 | 0.054 | 0.016 | 0.052 | 0 | 0.028 | |
centromere | |||||||||||
lys-4 | 1049 | 0.062 | 0.016 | 0.033 | 0.012 | 0.045 | 0.014 | 0.061 | 0.040 | 0.056 | |
cys-9 | 904 | 0.082 | 0.020 | 0.062 | 0.017 | 0.047 | 0.015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
ad-9 | 621 | 0.070 | 0.022 | 0.092 | 0.026 | 0.078 | 0.024 | 0.030 | 0.047 | 0.027 | |
al-1 | 1633 | 0.073 | 0.014 | 0.084 | 0.015 | 0.092 | 0.016 | 0.066 | 0.081 | 0.101 | |
lys-3 | 3348 | 0.063 | 0.009 | 0.067 | 0.009 | 0.063 | 0.009 | 0.013 | 0.024 | 0.013 | |
Pseudoautosomal | os-1 | 1683 | 0 | 0 | 0.057 | 0.012 | 0.057 | 0.012 | - | 0 | 0 |
prd-4 | 1474 | 0 | 0 | 0.146 | 0.022 | 0.146 | 0.022 | - | 0.031 | 0.031 | |
arg-13 | 706 | 0 | 0 | 0.122 | 0.027 | 0.122 | 0.027 | - | 0 | 0 | |
phr | 1768 | 0 | 0 | 0.102 | 0.017 | 0.102 | 0.017 | - | 0.091 | 0.091 | |
LGV | |||||||||||
Autosomal | mus-18 | 1738 | 0 | 0 | 0.151 | 0.020 | 0.151 | 0.020 | - | 0.024 | 0.024 |
ilv-1 | 1738 | 0 | 0 | 0.097 | 0.016 | 0.097 | 0.016 | - | 0 | 0 | |
cyh-2 | 379 | 0 | 0 | 0.032 | 0.019 | 0.032 | 0.019 | - | 0 | 0 | |
vma-3 | 310 | 0 | 0 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | - | 0 | 0 | |
al-3 | 1028 | 0 | 0 | 0.066 | 0.015 | 0.066 | 0.015 | - | 0.153 | 0.153 | |
ro-4 | 1862 | 0 | 0 | 0.099 | 0.021 | 0.099 | 0.021 | - | 0.037 | 0.037 | |
sod-2 | 612 | 0 | 0 | 0.043 | 0.018 | 0.043 | 0.018 | - | 0.248 | 0.248 | |
actin | 1122 | 0 | 0 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.007 | - | 0.106 | 0.106 | |
his-7 | 826 | 0 | 0 | 0.110 | 0.025 | 0.110 | 0.025 | - | 0.015 | 0.015 | |
LGVI | |||||||||||
Autosomal | Bml* | 251 | 0 | 0.055 | 0.017 | 0.055 | 0.017 | - | 0 | 0 | |
Linkage group/region | Locus | Sequence | d S | d N/d S | |||||||
compared (bp) | AT-aT | SE | AT-Nc | SE | aT-Nc | SE | AT-aT | AT-Nc | aT-Nc | ||
LGI | |||||||||||
Pseudoautosomal | ro-10 | 603 | 0 | 0 | 0.097 | 0.026 | 0.097 | 0.026 | - | 0.093 | 0.093 |
nit-2 | 3102 | 0 | 0 | 0.056 | 0.009 | 0.056 | 0.009 | - | 0.099 | 0.099 | |
krev-1 | 551 | 0 | 0 | 0.095 | 0.028 | 0.095 | 0.028 | - | 0.089 | 0.089 | |
sod-1 | 465 | 0 | 0 | 0.071 | 0.026 | 0.071 | 0.026 | - | 0.041 | 0.041 | |
Stratum 2 | mus-42 | 2972 | 0.013 | 0.004 | 0.117 | 0.014 | 0.119 | 0.014 | 0.105 | 0.235 | 0.224 |
rid | 2342 | 0 | 0 | 0.158 | 0.018 | 0.158 | 0.018 | - | 0.194 | 0.194 | |
leu-4 | 1838 | 0.028 | 0.008 | 0.067 | 0.013 | 0.057 | 0.012 | 0.05 | 0.054 | 0.063 | |
cys-5 | 870 | 0 | 0 | 0.035 | 0.013 | 0.035 | 0.013 | - | 0 | 0 | |
ser-3 | 1084 | 0.04 | 0.012 | 0.082 | 0.018 | 0.078 | 0.017 | 0.188 | 0.046 | 0.049 | |
tef-1 | 470 | 0.029 | 0.017 | 0.049 | 0.022 | 0.059 | 0.024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
un-3 | 1095 | 0.04 | 0.013 | 0.057 | 0.015 | 0.040 | 0.013 | 0.06 | 0.042 | 0.060 | |
mat | |||||||||||
Stratum 1 | aut1 | 898 | 0.055 | 0.017 | 0.024 | 0.011 | 0.050 | 0.016 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
upr-1 | 4959 | 0.056 | 0.007 | 0.067 | 0.008 | 0.071 | 0.008 | 0.264 | 0.349 | 0.327 | |
erg-8 | 1410 | 0.060 | 0.014 | 0.077 | 0.016 | 0.077 | 0.016 | 0.046 | 0.012 | 0.023 | |
arg-1 | 1117 | 0.047 | 0.014 | 0.023 | 0.010 | 0.039 | 0.012 | 0.025 | 0 | 0.031 | |
eth-1 | 866 | 0.029 | 0.012 | 0.064 | 0.018 | 0.054 | 0.016 | 0.052 | 0 | 0.028 | |
centromere | |||||||||||
lys-4 | 1049 | 0.062 | 0.016 | 0.033 | 0.012 | 0.045 | 0.014 | 0.061 | 0.040 | 0.056 | |
cys-9 | 904 | 0.082 | 0.020 | 0.062 | 0.017 | 0.047 | 0.015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
ad-9 | 621 | 0.070 | 0.022 | 0.092 | 0.026 | 0.078 | 0.024 | 0.030 | 0.047 | 0.027 | |
al-1 | 1633 | 0.073 | 0.014 | 0.084 | 0.015 | 0.092 | 0.016 | 0.066 | 0.081 | 0.101 | |
lys-3 | 3348 | 0.063 | 0.009 | 0.067 | 0.009 | 0.063 | 0.009 | 0.013 | 0.024 | 0.013 | |
Pseudoautosomal | os-1 | 1683 | 0 | 0 | 0.057 | 0.012 | 0.057 | 0.012 | - | 0 | 0 |
prd-4 | 1474 | 0 | 0 | 0.146 | 0.022 | 0.146 | 0.022 | - | 0.031 | 0.031 | |
arg-13 | 706 | 0 | 0 | 0.122 | 0.027 | 0.122 | 0.027 | - | 0 | 0 | |
phr | 1768 | 0 | 0 | 0.102 | 0.017 | 0.102 | 0.017 | - | 0.091 | 0.091 | |
LGV | |||||||||||
Autosomal | mus-18 | 1738 | 0 | 0 | 0.151 | 0.020 | 0.151 | 0.020 | - | 0.024 | 0.024 |
ilv-1 | 1738 | 0 | 0 | 0.097 | 0.016 | 0.097 | 0.016 | - | 0 | 0 | |
cyh-2 | 379 | 0 | 0 | 0.032 | 0.019 | 0.032 | 0.019 | - | 0 | 0 | |
vma-3 | 310 | 0 | 0 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | - | 0 | 0 | |
al-3 | 1028 | 0 | 0 | 0.066 | 0.015 | 0.066 | 0.015 | - | 0.153 | 0.153 | |
ro-4 | 1862 | 0 | 0 | 0.099 | 0.021 | 0.099 | 0.021 | - | 0.037 | 0.037 | |
sod-2 | 612 | 0 | 0 | 0.043 | 0.018 | 0.043 | 0.018 | - | 0.248 | 0.248 | |
actin | 1122 | 0 | 0 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.007 | - | 0.106 | 0.106 | |
his-7 | 826 | 0 | 0 | 0.110 | 0.025 | 0.110 | 0.025 | - | 0.015 | 0.015 | |
LGVI | |||||||||||
Autosomal | Bml* | 251 | 0 | 0.055 | 0.017 | 0.055 | 0.017 | - | 0 | 0 |
Each of synonymous nucleotide divergence estimates (dS) are followed by standard errors (SE). Genes are listed from the left to right flank of the mating-type chromosome according to gene order in N. crassa.
The divergence (d S) between alleles of the N. tetrasperma heterokaryon in the first stratum did not differ significantly from the divergence between alleles of N. tetrasperma and N. crassa (Table 2). Thus, the data suggest that the event creating Stratum 1 was close to the time of the split of N. tetrasperma from a common ancestor with N. crassa.
The ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions per site (d N/d S) did not differ between alleles of the two mat chromosomes and between any of these and N. crassa, and no difference in d N/d S was found between N. tetrasperma and N. crassa when comparing the region of blocked recombination with the other genes of the genome (Table 2).
Mapping the Boundaries and Estimating the Size of the Non-Recombining Region in Strain P581
To establish the left flank boundary of the non-recombining region, allelic segregation of mus-42 was scored in 152 heterokaryotic (mat A and mat a) progeny of the selfed cross of P581. The marker mus-42 was heteroallelic in all 152 progeny, confirming no crossovers between mat and mus-42 during meiosis. Given a crossover-rate of above 1.95% in this interval in N. crassa, we calculate an over 95% probability of detecting a crossover event in 152 offspring (estimated as 1- the probability of finding one crossover in 152 offspring). Thus, mus-42 is genetically linked to the region of blocked recombination, and our data strongly indicate that the boundary of the non-recombining region is located left of mus-42.
The N. crassa genome sequence (http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/genome/neurospora/) was used to estimate the physical size of the non-recombining region in N. tetrasperma strain P581, assuming that the mat a-chromosome is collinear with N. crassa [11]. The entire region of blocked recombination occupies about 6.9 Mbp (78.4% of the total chromosomal length), but the size of each stratum within the block differs: the older Stratum 1 is 6.6 Mbp (75%), while the more recent Stratum 2 is 0.3 Mbp (3.4%) (Figure 1A).
Linkage Analysis of Genes on the Mat A-Chromosome of Strain P581
An altered gene order in the mat a-chromosome of strain P581 could explain the lack of divergence in rid and cys-5. A cross between two strains of N. crassa, one of which contained an introgressed mat a-chromosome originating from P581 (referred to as mat a T) was used to infer gene order by crossover frequencies between mat chromosome loci (Supporting Information, Table S1). The small number of crossovers among markers in the 83 scored progeny and the lack of double crossovers show tight linkage of the genes, as is known in N. crassa, but cannot be used to conclude a definitive gene order. However, all possible orders of these tightly linked genes place them well within the region of blocked recombination.
Evolutionary Relationship of Five Selected Genes of the Mating-Type Chromosome in Strains Representing Two Lineages of N. tetrasperma
The evolutionary history of mat chromosome strata may vary among the divergent lineages known within N. tetrasperma [20]. To test this possibility, five genes within Stratum 1 were sequenced from single mating-type components of six heterokaryons, representing two phylogenetic lineages of N. tetrasperma. The sequences of these genes from the mat chromosome were identical for the mat A-component strains of each lineage. The mat a-component strains of each lineage also had identical gene sequences, except for one intron polymorphism that was found in upr-1 between mat a-component of strain P2361 (FGSC 4372) and the two other mat a-component strains of Lineage 1. Synonymous sequence divergence values between allele pairs of the heterokaryons are shown in Table 3. One most parsimonious tree for each of the genes upr-1, eth-1, lys-4, ad-9 and lys-3, and bootstrap support for branches, are shown in Figure 1B.
Table 3. Synonymous Sequence Divergence (d S) between Alleles of Five Genes on the Mating-Type Chromosome in Two Lineages of N. tetrasperma.
Locus | Sequence compared (bp) | Strains | |||||
Lineage 1 | Lineage 2 | ||||||
P5811 | P505 | ||||||
P556 | P510 | ||||||
P2361 | P4460 | ||||||
AT-aT | AT-Nc | aT-Nc | AT-aT | AT-Nc | aT-Nc | ||
upr-1 | 806 | 0.0612-0.0673 | 0.044 | 0.0442-0.0503 | 0.022 | 0.056 | 0.050 |
eth-1 | 863 | 0.029 | 0.059 | 0.049 | 0.024 | 0.049 | 0.065 |
lys-4 | 607 | 0.074 | 0.029 | 0.044 | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.014 |
ad-9 | 544 | 0.082 | 0.108 | 0.091 | 0 | 0.108 | 0.108 |
lys-3 | 731 | 0.039 | 0.051 | 0.022 | 0 | 0.028 | 0.028 |
All strains follow Fungal Genetics Stock Center (FGSC) numbers as in Table 1.
Strain P2361.
Strains P581 and P556. Comparisons between mat A and mat a component strains originating from six heterokaryotic N. tetrasperma strains (AT-aT), belonging to two phylogenetic lineages [20], and between each of the mating-type strains and the N. crassa genome sequence (AT-Nc; aT-Nc). Genes are listed from left to right on the chromosome based on gene order in N. crassa.
Both synonymous divergence data and genealogies confirm that the alleles located on the mat A and mat a-chromosomes within heterokaryons of all five genes of Lineage 1 diverged early. In contrast, a more recent split of the alleles within heterokaryons are found in Lineage 2 (Table 3; Mann-Whitney test, p<0.0119). Although no synonymous divergence was found for ad-9 and lys-3 of Lineage 2 (Table 3), the presence of one non-synonymous change in lys-3 indicates that recombination is suppressed in this whole region in both lineages (Figure 1B). The genes sequenced here were limited to Stratum 1, and although alleles in this stratum are assumed to have started to diverge in the early evolution of the species (see above), our data imply different evolutionary histories of this part of the mat chromosome in the two lineages of N. tetrasperma.
Estimates of Divergence Times
The Kimura 2-parameter genetic distance between N. crassa and N. tetrasperma, based on intron-data from autosomal genes (i.e. genes located on chromosomes other than the mating-type chromosome; Table 2), was found to be 0.0533. Assuming a divergence time of Eurotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes between 400 to 670 MYA and using the Langley Fitch algorithm to calculate substitution-rate [21], we estimate that N. tetrasperma diverged from a common ancestor with N. crassa between 3.5 and 5.8 MYA.
Discussion
Although fungi have no differentiated sexes, i.e. female/male dichotomy of individuals carrying gametes of different sizes, the data presented here confirms that similar mechanisms drive the evolution of sex chromosomes found in the animal and plant kingdoms and the fungal mating-type chromosomes in Neurospora tetrasperma. First, the mating-type chromosomes in the pseudohomothallic N. tetrasperma fail to recombine over the majority of its length; here we establish that in strain P581 the non-recombining region covers almost 7 Mbp, over 75% of the mating-type chromosome. Previous studies, using the same fungal strain, have shown suppressed recombination of a large portion of the mating-type chromosomes of N. tetrasperma [9]–[11]. This study was able to more precisely identify the boundaries and size of the non-recombining region. Notably, the left arm of the non-recombining region is shorter than previously reported [22]; the earlier suggestion that the non-recombining region begins around nit-2 was not supported here. Instead, the left boundary appears located close to mus-42 (Figure 1A).
Furthermore, in analogy to systems of sex chromosomes representing all three kingdoms [15]–[19], our data revealed that the evolutionary events leading to the suppression of recombination involved two successive events, resulting in two evolutionary strata, 6.6 Mbp and 0.3 Mbp in size, respectively. Thus, the data suggest that in this fungus stepwise cessation of recombination can take place over a vast genomic region up to 6.6Mbp in size. The event(s) that suppressed recombination are unknown. In the absence of a single, large structural change we may expect a more gradual change in divergence along the chromosome. The simplest possible hypothesis is that Stratum 1 correlates with one large inversion. However, when such a pericentric inversion has been observed on the mating-type chromosome of N. crassa, an inversion loop appears to be formed during meiosis, allowing both pairing and crossing over of the inverted region as well as the formation of inviable and unstable progeny [23]. Since such an inversion loop or crossovers do not occur in N. tetrasperma, multiple mechanisms for blocking recombination along the mating-type chromosome are likely to be involved. With the upcoming availability of the genome sequence of N. tetrasperma (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/) we should be able to disentangle what factor resulted in ceased recombination in this region.
Interestingly, the non-recombining region extends over the majority of the chromosome, although a shorter non-recombining region between mat and the centromere would itself be sufficient for the first division meiotic segregation of mating-type that is needed for pseudohomothallism [13]. If one event caused the large Stratum 1, as indicated by our data, it could be the reason for the apparently unnecessary large size. In this context, the reason for the more recent Stratum 2 is obscure. In an earlier study of C. neoformans Fraser and co-workers hypothesized that the accumulation of transposable elements would explain the pattern of a gradually growing non-homologous region between the two mating-type chromosomes [19]. Testing the transposon-mediated chromosomal rearrangement hypothesis in N. tetrasperma would require further investigation, again possible with the sequenced genome.
A small number of genes showed sequence divergence (d S) that deviated slightly from the other genes located within the same stratum. For example, in Stratum 2, rid and cys-5 showed no sequence divergence in exons between corresponding alleles (d S = 0). In these two genes, no introns are present to support homogenization or divergence between the alleles. However, the mapping data indicate conserved order of nine markers (including rid and cys-5) located between ro-10 and mat (Supporting Information, Table S1), suggesting that they are not translocated in N. tetrasperma. For eth-1, located in Stratum 1, we found a ds-value of 0.029, which is roughly half the value found for alleles of the other genes in that stratum. As the actual mapping location of eth-1 was not investigated, the possibility should not be excluded that this gene was recently translocated from the younger evolutionary stratum.
Studies from a diverse range of systems have revealed that lack of recombination per se is sufficient for genetic degeneration of a chromosome such as gene loss and null-mutations at protein coding genes, and for transposable element accumulation [4],[24]. The heterokaryotic life-style of N. tetrasperma, in which cells during the whole life-cycle carry two nuclei of separate mating-types, would be expected to further favor the erosion of a gene located on these chromosomes, since maintaining function requires an active counterpart on only one of the chromosomes. However, we found no evidence for relaxed selective constraints, as judged from the d N/d S comparisons between genes on the mating-type chromosomes and the autosomes, or gene loss in the mating-type chromosomes of N. tetrasperma. This observation could be due to the very young age of the system. Alternatively, an occasional homokaryotic part of the life cycle [25], would unmask recessive deleterious mutations and purge these from the population. The accumulation of repetitive elements along the mating-type chromosome remains an interesting target for future research, because these are found to be very early colonizers of non-recombining chromosomes of animal and plant systems [26]–[29].
Multiple phylogenetic lineages exist within N. tetrasperma, all of them being pseudohomothallic [20]. The transition from heterothallism to pseudohomothallism in N. tetrasperma is associated with loss of mating-type heterokaryon incompatibility. This loss of heterokaryon incompatibility is required to maintain pseudohomothallism and may explain the sexual dysfunction observed when single mating-type strains are outcrossed in the laboratory [30]. The existence of eight-spored outbreeding sister-species to N. tetrasperma [i.e. (N. crassa (N. tetrasperma, PS1, N.sitophila)) see [31]; Jeremy Dettman and John Taylor, personal communication] indicate that the non-recombining region formed at or after the split of N. tetrasperma from N. crassa. We found that Stratum 1 was contemporaneous with the split of N. tetrasperma from a common ancestor with N. crassa, estimated to be between 3.5 to 5.8 MYA. Assuming that the non-recombining region is a prerequisite for pseudohomothallism would suggest that all lineages of N. tetrasperma should share Stratum 1 of the mat-chromosome. In contrast, the divergence data and genealogies of five genes located in Stratum 1 suggest that the two different N. tetrasperma lineages share a non-recombining region on the mating-type chromosome due to convergent evolutionary events. We hypothesize that pseudohomothallism evolved in a stepwise manner, and that in the early evolution of pseudohomothallism in N. tetrasperma there was no recombination block, but that it evolved independently in the different lineages as a selective response for a more efficient pseudohomothallism with absolute first division meiotic segregation of mating type.
Elucidating mechanisms by which sex chromosomes evolve from autosomes has been accelerated by the revolution in genomic science. Considerable insight into plants and animals can be gained through the study of alternative systems, such as N. tetrasperma, in which the genomic consequences of reduced recombination per se can be disentangled from sex-biased evolutionary forces such as male-biased mutation and dispersal [32],[33]. Thus, the system presented here has the potential to contribute significantly to the general understanding of the forces shaping sex chromosomes, as well as general insights into how levels of polymorphism vary among different regions of the genome.
Materials and Methods
Strains and Cultural Conditions
N. tetrasperma strains used in this study were obtained from the Fungal Genetics Stock Center (FGSC), Kansas City, KS, or from the Perkins collection at Stanford University, and are listed in Table 1. The Perkins collection is now curated and available from the FGSC. The single mating-type component strains of each heterokaryon (i.e. the homokaryotic mat A or mat a-strains) were originally obtained through the isolation of homokaryotic sexual or asexual spores occasionally produced by the heterokaryon. The identity of the mating type was confirmed by PCR using allele specific primers [34]. Crosses were made using standard methods on synthetic cross (SC) medium [35] at 25°C. Strains for DNA extraction were grown in minimal medium broth [36] with 1% sucrose for 3 days at 37°C.
DNA Manipulations
DNA was extracted from fungal vegetative tissue using methods previously described [37]. PCR reactions were performed using the Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations, using an Eppendorf epgradient S thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). PCR products were purified using ExoSap-IT (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK), and sequencing was performed by Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea, utilizing ABI 3730 XL automated sequencers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Raw sequence data were analyzed using the SeqMan version 5.01 software from DNASTAR package (DNASTAR, Madison, WI) and BioEdit version 7.0.5.2 [38].
Evolutionary Divergence of Alleles Located on the Mat Chromosome in a Single N. tetrasperma Heterokaryon, P581
Exon sequences from 25 genes located on the mating-type chromosome (also referred to as Linkage Group I: LGI) and ten genes located on autosomes (LGV and LGVI) were chosen for analysis (Table 2). Primers for amplification of nuclear genes were designed from the N. crassa genome sequence (http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/genome/neurospora/Home.html) by using the PrimerSelect version 5.01 software of the DNASTAR package (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). Primer sequences and information is found in Supporting Information, Table S2. Sequences were PCR-amplified from the separate, homokaryotic, single-mating-type component strains of the wild-type heterokaryon P581: mat A (FGSC 2508) and mat a (FGSC 2509) (Table 1).
Synonymous and non-synonymous nucleotide divergence values (d S and d N, respectively) were estimated between alleles using DNAsp version 4.10.9 [39]. Comparisons were made between N. tetrasperma alleles from the different single-mating-type component strains, as well as between the N. tetrasperma alleles and the N. crassa genome sequence.
Mapping the Boundaries of the Non-Recombining Region in Strain P581
To establish the boundary of the non-recombining region on the left flank of LGI of strain P581, recombination was assessed in individual sexual progeny originating from a selfed cross of the heterokaryotic mycelia. Hetero- or homoallelism of mus-42, located at the leftmost side of the non-recombining region, was scored in 152 heterokaryotic (mat A+mat a) progeny, by digesting PCR products obtained by primers TF1 and TR1 (Supporting Information, Table S2) with the restriction enzyme NmuCI (Fermentas Life Sciences, Germany), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. NmuCI has an additional recognition site in the mus-42 allele from the mat A-chromosome of P581, as compared to that of mat a, making it possible to separate the two alleles with agarose gel electrophoresis subsequent to amplification and digestion. A recombination event between mat and mus-42 would result in homoallelism of mus-42 and heteroallelism of mat found in a single sexual progeny.
The Gene Order of the Mat A-Chromosome in Strain P581
Jacobson [11] suggested that the mat a-chromosome of N. tetrasperma (mat a T) is collinear with the N. crassa mat a (mat a C) chromosome. In order to further establish the location of the genes investigated in this study, we carried out a finer scale linkage analysis of the mat a T chromosome of strain P581 by crossing a fifth backcross progeny of mat a T of P581 introgressed into the N. crassa background (DJ1544-2a) [11] and N. crassa (FGSC 3789A) (Table 1). First, by DNA sequencing, we confirmed that the parental strain DJ1544-2a contained exclusively N. tetrasperma alleles at the genes between mus-42 and mat, allowing for normal linkage testing in this region. Subsequently, the molecular markers mus-42, rid, leu-4, cys-5, ser-3 and tef-1, and the genetic markers ro-10, mep and mat, were scored for 83 progeny from the cross DJ1544-2a×FGSC 3789A. For mus-42, rid, leu-4, cys-5, ser-3 and tef-1 we scored N. tetrasperma and N. crassa alleles by PCR-amplification and amplicon digestion using the primer pairs and restriction enzymes TF1 & TR1 (NmuCI), rid-1F2 & rid-1R2 (NmuCI), leu-4F1 & leu-4R1 (EheI), cys-5F & cys-5R (FspBI), ser-3F & ser-3R (HincII) and ef-1aF1 & ef-1aR1 (SmuI), respectively. Primers sequences are found in online Supporting Information, Table S2, enzymes were obtained from Fermentas Life Sciences, Germany, and digestion was performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Genetic markers were scored as described previously [11]. Recombination frequencies between the markers were compared to those expected for wild-type N. crassa.
Divergence and Phylogeny of Selected Genes from Multiple Strains of N. tetrasperma
The genes upr-1, eth-1, lys-4, ad-9 and lys-3 of the homokaryotic, single mating-type components of six N. tetrasperma heterokaryotic strains, belonging to either of two well-supported phylogenetic lineages of N. tetrasperma (Table 1), were PCR-amplified and sequenced using primers pairs upr-1F1 & upr-1R1, eth-1F1 & ethR1, lys-4F1 & lys-4R1, ad-9F & ad-9R and lys-3F1 & lys-3R1 (Supporting Information, Table S2), respectively. Sequences were aligned for each gene using the Clustal W algorithm of BioEdit version 7.0.5.2 and alignments are available from TreeBASE (study accession no. S1960; matrixes M3612-M3616). Synonymous divergence values (d S) were estimated between the pairs of alleles of the single mating-type components originating from each of the six heterokaryotic strains of N. tetrasperma, as well as between these alleles and the N. crassa genome sequence, as described above. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out in PAUP 4.0b [40]. For each gene, we identified maximum parsimony (MP) trees by heuristic searches using the tree bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch-swapping algorithm using N. crassa as outgroup. All characters were of equal weight and unordered, and statistical support for phylogenetic grouping was assessed by bootstrap analysis using 1000 replicate datasets with the random addition of sequences during each heuristic search.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Jeremy Dettman, Timothy James, Takao Kasuga and John Taylor for valuable discussions. We acknowledge Dr. David Perkins' numerous and distinguished contributions to genetic research with N. tetrasperma, and are grateful for his interest and support for this work.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Financial support to AM from Sven and Lilly Lawski Foundation, to HJ from Carl Trygger Foundation and Nilsson-Ehle donations is greatly acknowledged. DJJ was supported by US National Science Foundation grant MCB-0417282, awarded to David D. Perkins (deceased), Stanford University.
References
- 1.Ohno S. Berlin: Springer; 1967. Sex chromosome and sex-linked genes. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Westergaard M. The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Adv Genet. 1958;9:217–281. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60163-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.White MJD. Insect Reproduction; In: Leather SR, Hardie J, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Marais G. Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity. 2005;95:118–128. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fraser JA, Heitman J. Evolution of fungal sex chromosomes. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51:299–306. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Glass NL, Vollmer SJ, Staben C, Grotelueschen J, Metzenberg RL, et al. DNAs of the two mating-type alleles of Neurospora crassa are highly dissimilar. Science. 1988;241:570–573. doi: 10.1126/science.2840740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee N, Bakkeren G, Wong K, Sherwood JE, Kronstad JW. The mating-type and pathogenicity locus of the fungus Ustilago hordei spans a 500-kb region. PNAS. 1999;96:15026–15031. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lengeler KB, Fox DS, Fraser JA, Allen A, Forrester K, et al. Mating-type locus of Cryptococcus neoformans: a step in the evolution of sex chromosomes. Eukaryot Cell. 2002;1:704–718. doi: 10.1128/EC.1.5.704-718.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Merino ST, Nelson MA, Jacobson DJ, Natvig DO. Pseudohomothallism and evolution of the mating-type chromosome in Neurospora tetrasperma. Genetics. 1996;143:789–799. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gallegos A, Jacobson DJ, Raju NB, Skupski MP, Natvig DO. Suppressed recombination and a pairing anomaly on the mating-type chromosome of Neurospora tetrasperma. Genetics. 2000;154:623–633. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.2.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jacobson DJ. Blocked recombination along the mating-type chromosomes of Neurospora tetrasperma involves both structural heterozygosity and autosomal genes. Genetics. 2005;171:839–843. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.044040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dodge BO. Nuclear phenomena associated with heterothallism and homothallism in the ascomycete Neurospora. J Agr Res. 1927;35:289–305. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Raju NB, Perkins DD. Diverse Programs of Ascus Development in Pseudohomothallic Species of Neurospora, Gelasinospora, and Podospora. Dev Genet. 1994;15:104–118. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020150111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brooks LD. The evolution of recombination rates. In: Michod RE, Levin BR, editors. The Evolution of Sex. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; 1988. pp. 87–105. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lahn BT, Page DC. Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science. 1999;286:964–967. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5441.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sandstedt SA, Tucker PK. Evolutionary strata on the mouse X chromosome correspond to strata on the human X chromosome. Genome Res. 2004;14:267–272. doi: 10.1101/gr.1796204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nicolas M, Marais G, Hykelova V, Janousek B, Laporte V, et al. A gradual process of recombination restriction in the evolutionary history of the sex chromosomes in dioecious plants. Plos Biology. 2005;3:47–56. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Handley LL, Ceplitis H, Ellegren H. Evolutionary strata on the chicken Z chromosome: Implications for sex chromosome evolution. Genetics. 2004;167:367–376. doi: 10.1534/genetics.167.1.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fraser JA, Diezmann S, Subaran RL, Allen A, Lengeler KB, et al. Convergent evolution of chromosomal sex-determining regions in the animal and fungal kingdoms. Plos Biology. 2004;2:2243–2255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Saenz GS, Jacobson DJ, Dvorachek WH, Natvig DO. Sympatric biological and phylogenetic species among pseudohomothallic isolates identified as Neurospora tetrasperma. Fungal Genetics Newsletter. 2003;50(Suppl):144. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kasuga T, White TJ, Taylor JW. Estimation of nucleotide substitution rates in Eurotiomycete fungi. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19:2318–2324. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gallegos A, Jacobson DJ, Raju NB, Skupski MP, Natvig DO. Suppressed recombination and a pairing anomaly on the mating-type chromosome of Neurospora tetrasperma. Genetics. 2000;154:623–633. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.2.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Newmeyer D, Taylor CW. A pericentric inversion in Neurospora, with unstable duplication progeny. Genetics. 1967;56:771–791. doi: 10.1093/genetics/56.4.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bachtrog D. A dynamic view of sex chromosome evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16:578–585. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2006.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Raju NB. Functional Heterothallism Resulting from Homokaryotic Conidia and Ascospores in Neurospora tetrasperma. Mycol Res. 1992;96:103–116. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu ZY, Moore PH, Ma H, Ackerman CM, Ragiba M, et al. A primitive Y chromosome in papaya marks incipient sex chromosome evolution. Nature. 2004;427:348–352. doi: 10.1038/nature02228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Filatov DA. Substitution rates in a new Silene latifolia sex-linked gene, SlssX/Y. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:402–408. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Peichel CL, Ross JA, Matson CK, Dickson M, Grimwood J, et al. The master sex-determination locus in threespine sticklebacks is on a nascent Y chromosome. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1416–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kondo M, Hornung U, Nanda I, Imai S, Sasaki T, et al. Genomic organization of the sex-determining and adjacent regions of the sex chromosomes of medaka. Genome Res. 2006;16:815–826. doi: 10.1101/gr.5016106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Saenz GS, Stam JG, Jacobson DJ, Natvig DO. Heteroallelism at the het-c locus contributes to sexual dysfunction in outcrossed strains of Neurospora tetrasperma. Fungal Genet Biol. 2001;34:123–129. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.2001.1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dettman JR, Jacobson DJ, Taylor JW. Multilocus sequence data reveal extensive phylogenetic species diversity within the Neurospora discreta complex. Mycologia. 2006;98:436–446. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.98.3.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hurst LD, Ellegren H. Sex biases in the mutation rate. Trends Genet. 1998;14:446–452. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01577-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang JL, Caballero A. Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populations. Heredity. 1999;82:212–226. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wik L, Karlsson M, Johannesson H. The evolutionary trajectory of the mating-type (mat) genes in the model genus Neurospora relates to reproductive behavior of taxa. Submitted. 2007 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Westergaard M, Mitchell HK. A synthetic medium favouring sexual reproduction. Am J Bot. 1947;34:573–577. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vogel H. Distribution of lysine pathways among fungi: evolutionary implications. Am Nat. 1964;98:435–466. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Johannesson H, Stenlid J. Molecular identification of wood-inhabiting fungi in an unmanaged Picea abies forest in Sweden. Forest Ecol Manag. 1999;115:203–211. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acid Symposium Series. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:2496–2497. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Swofford DL. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2002. PAUP* : phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.