Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immigr Minor Health. 2008 Jul;10(3):197–205. doi: 10.1007/s10903-007-9070-x

Mortality in First Generation White Immigrants in California, 1989–1999

Kiumarss Nasseri 1
PMCID: PMC2268633  NIHMSID: NIHMS37031  PMID: 17661176

Abstract

Objective

To identify mortality differentials in the first generation non-Hispanic White (NHW) immigrants in California for 1989 through 1999.

Methods

First generation NHW immigrants (107,432) were identified in California Death Certificate files by place of birth outside the US and were grouped into Anglo-Saxon dominant, Northern, Western, Eastern, and Southern Europe, former USSR, Arabs and non-Arab Middle Eastern areas. US-born NHW (1,480,347) were used as standard to determine proportional mortality ratios (PMR) for major causes of death including: cancers, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular accidents, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), HIV/AIDS, accidents, diabetes, pneumonia, suicide, and homicide.

Results

All immigrants had significantly higher PMR for suicide and with few exceptions for cardiovascular diseases. Lower PMR was recorded for COPD and homicide. No difference was noticed for pneumonia and accidents. Cancer deaths were generally higher in European immigrants.

Conclusions

Mortality patterns of NHW immigrants reflect the mixed impacts of acculturation, ethnic-specific characteristics, and psychological well being.

Keywords: First generation immigrants, Immigrant studies, White Immigrants, Proportional mortality ratio

Introduction

Studies of disease in migrant populations form the basis of attempts to separate the effects of genetic makeup, ethnic characteristics, and environmental exposures. These studies are particularly relevant to chronic diseases with multiple risk factors such as cancers and cardiovascular diseases. The main type of migrant study involves the comparison of various immigrant populations with the natives of the host country that allows for evaluation of the effects of different ethnicity and genetic make up in a similar environment [1]. A major requirement for this kind of study is accurate identification of immigrant populations in the host country. Many countries with large immigrant populations maintain detailed databases that have extensively been used for epidemiological and other public health studies [27]. Detailed information maintained in these files has facilitated the extension of migrant studies to include the second generation immigrants born in the host country. These extended studies have helped with better understanding the impacts of acculturation and exposure to environmental factors [8, 9].

In the US, detailed administrative data on immigrant populations are generally not available for epidemiological and public health research. Place of birth and race/ethnicity are generally collected on self identification with little documentation. Information on place of birth is necessary to identify the first generation immigrants, and although it is uniformly recorded on the paper copy of the death certificate, it is only partially captured in the electronic file that is frequently used for epidemiological studies [10]. This has severely limited the scope and quality of migrant studies in the US. Few reported research in this field either have used a general category of “foreign-born” to collectively identify the first generation immigrants, or are limited to few specific countries like China, Japan, the Philippines, and Korea that are individually identified on the death certificate master file [11]. Another issue with migrant studies in the US is the lack of accurate denominator data that is occasionally estimated for specific research [12].

The population in California is generally grouped into five major categories of non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian and Native Alaskan. Hispanics and the non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders are further classified into subgroups based on their ancestry [13] that has widely been used for reporting cancer incidence and mortality in California [14]. The NHW population is also a heterogeneous mix that includes individuals with ethnic backgrounds extending from Northern Europe to North Africa, and the British Isles to Indian subcontinent. Ethnic and geographic differentials in morbidity and mortality in these populations are well documented and reported [15, 16], but have rarely been studied in the US, except for a few reported research that have focused on the Arab-American group [17, 18].

The objective of the analysis reported here was to identify the ethnic differentials in mortality for major causes of death in the first generation white immigrants in California for the period 1989 through 1999.

Methods

Sources of Data

The electronic file of the death certificates issued to residents of California for 1989–1999 was used for this study. Information on place of birth on this file was enhanced by linking it with the file of applications for the social security number that is maintained by the Social Security Administration (SSA). The nature and quality of this linkage is reported elsewhere [19]. A total of 107,432 death certificates on NHW individuals born in Europe, Middle East, and North Africa were selected for this study. Utilizing the enhanced information on place of birth, these individuals were grouped into eight geographic/ethnic categories: Anglo-Saxon ancestry: Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Northern Europe: Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. Western Europe: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and Vatican City. Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Malta, Monaco, Portugal, Spain, and Cyprus. Eastern Europe: Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Yugoslavia. Former USSR: Belarus, Russia, Ukraine, and USSR. To increase the homogeneity of the immigrant groups, particularly those from the Middle East, they are presented as one group and also subdivided into Arabs and non-Arabs. The non-Arab Middle East: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, and Turkey. Arab Middle East: Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Gaza Strip, West Bank, Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Sudan, and Tunisia. Also categorized is the Middle East that is a combination of the Arabs and no-Arabs.

The standard population of 1,480,347 US-born NHW residents of California was obtained from a different edition of the same death certificate master files that is released by the California Cancer Registry and identifies the NHW as a distinct group [20].

Causes of Death

The underlying cause of death on the death certificates were transferred to the electronic death certificate master file by the California Department of Health Services according to the algorithm suggested by the Center for Health Statistics (NCSH) using international classification of disease (ICD) codes. From 1989 through 1998, the 9th version of the ICD (ICD-9) was used [21]. Beginning with the 1999 death certificates, the 10th ed. (ICD-10) is being used [22]. Codes in ICD-10 are more detailed and begin with a letter. For this analysis the causes of death were grouped into the following categories: All Cancers (1400–2390, C009-D489), Diabetes Mellitus (2500–2509, E100-E149), Coronary heart disease (3900–3989, 4020–4029, 4040–4299, I000-I099, I110-I119, I200-I519), Cerebrovascular accidents (4300–4389, I600-I699), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (4900–4969, J400-J479), AIDS and HIV infections (0420–0449, B200-B249), Pneumonia and Influenza (4800–4879, J100-J189), Suicide and self inflicted harm (9500–9599, X600-X849, Y870), Homicide and legal intervention (9600–9789, X850-Y099, Y350-Y359, Y871), Accidents (8000–9499, V010-X599, Y850-Y869), Hypertension without heart involvement (4010–4019, 4030–4039, I100-I109, I120-I129), Gastric and duodenal ulcers (5310–5339, K250-K289), Cirrhosis and chronic liver disease (5710–5719, K700-K709, K730-K749), Nephritis and infection of the kidneys (5800–5899, N000-N079, N170-N199, N250-N279), and all other causes combined.

Statistical Analysis

The US-born NHW residents of California were used as the standard population for calculation of the expected numbers. Cause-specific proportional mortality ratios (PMRs) were calculated by the division of the observed deaths by the expected numbers and were age-adjusted, based on 18 five-year categories, as described below [23]. The 95% confidence interval of the PMR was based on Poisson distribution of the observed number and was labeled significant when did not include 1 [24], and all statistical analyses were completed in SAS (Statistical Analysis Software).

PMR=djej

where

ej=dj(dnhwjtnhwj)

dj, number of cause-, area-, and sex-specific death for age group j; ej, number of expected cause-, area-, and sex-specific death for age group j; dnhwj, number of cause-, and sex-specific death in standard population for age group j; tnhwj, total number of sex-specific death in standard population for age group j.

Results

Table 1 presents the distribution of the observed deaths that are used in this analysis by place of birth and sex. Immigrants from the Arabian Middle East were the smallest group, followed by those from the Northern Europe. Immigrants with Anglo-Saxon ancestry are the largest group in this study.

Table 1.

Distribution of deaths by sex and place of birth, NHW residents, California, 1989–1999

Place of birth Male Female Total
NHW US-born 769,405 710,942 1,480,347
Anglo-Saxon 19,753 23,644 43,397
Northern Europe 2,543 2,685 5,228
Western Europe 5,840 8,135 13,975
Southern Europe 5,109 5,879 10,988
Eastern Europe 5,305 5,283 10,588
Former USSR 4,072 5,595 9,667
Middle East 7,755 5,834 13,589
Arab Middle East 2,801 1,796 4,597
Non-Arab Middle East 4,954 4,038 8,992
Total 827,537 773,831 1,601,368

The following tables present the observed and expected numbers of deaths, PMR and its 95% confidence intervals for major causes of deaths by sex and area of birth.

Table 2 presents deaths from the coronary heart disease. It shows that death from this cause in the Angelo-Saxon, Northern, Western, and Southern Europe is generally similar to the standard population of the US-born NHW white residents of California, whereas the PMR for immigrants from Eastern Europe, former USSR, and the Middle East, both Arabs and non-Arabs, it is significantly higher.

Table 2.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

Coronary heart disease Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 241,743 234,780
Anglo-Saxon 6,571 6628.1 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 7,960 8039.6 0.99 (0.97–1.01)
Northern Europe 775 841.1 0.92 (0.86–0.99) 886 920.08 0.96 (0.90–1.03)
Western Europe 1,870 1790.7 1.04 (1.00–1.09) 2,524 2595.3 0.97 (0.93–1.01)
Southern Europe 1,673 1691.2 0.99 (0.94–1.04) 2,257 2167.7 1.04(1.00–1.09)
Eastern Europe 1,957 1762.5 1.11 (1.06–1.16) 1,964 1835.9 1.07 (1.02–1.12)
Former USSR 1,556 1353.3 1.15 (1.09–1.21) 2,314 2008.8 1.15 (1.11–1.20)
Middle East 2,883 2414.2 1.19 (1.15–1.24) 2,275 1827.2 1.25 (1.19–1.30)
Arab Middle East 1,051 823.41 1.28 (1.20–1.36) 642 487.31 1.32 (1.22–1.42)
Non-Arab Middle East 1,832 1590.8 1.15 (1.10–1.21) 1,633 1339.9 1.22 (1.16–1.28)

Table 3 presents deaths due to all cancers combined. Cancer PMR is generally higher in all immigrants groups except for men from Eastern Europe and the Arabian Middle East. In women, those from Southern Europe and the Middle East, both Arabs and non-Arabs have lower PMR.

Table 3.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

All cancers Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 189,613 168,336
Anglo-Saxon 5,207 5,032.6 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 5,960 5,558.4 1.07 (1.05–1.10)
Northern Europe 791 693.66 1.14 (1.06–1.22) 753 621.27 1.21 (1.13–1.30)
Western Europe 1,600 1,516.4 1.06 (1.00–1.11) 2,442 2,128 1.15 (1.10–1.19)
Southern Europe 1,529 1,336.9 1.14 (1.09–1.20) 1,183 1,155.7 1.02 (0.97–1.08)
Eastern Europe 1,470 1,423.9 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 1,295 1,190.2 1.09 (1.03–1.15)
Former USSR 1,117 1,002 1.11 (1.05–1.18) 1,338 1,154.6 1.16 (1.10–1.22)
Middle East 2,014 1,947.9 1.03 (0.99–1.08) 1,494 1,500.8 1.00 (0.95–1.05)
Arab Middle East 720 746.62 0.96 (0.90–1.04) 534 560.09 0.95 (0.87–1.04)
Non-Arab Middle East 1,294 1,201.3 1.08 (1.02–1.14) 960 940.69 1.02 (0.96–1.09)

Table 4 presents deaths from COPDs. Low PMR for both sexes in all immigrant groups suggests that this cause of death is less frequent among the NHW immigrants when compared to the US-born NHW residents of California.

Table 4.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

COPD* Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 43,590 43,964
Anglo-Saxon 1,097 1,239 0.89 (0.83–0.94) 1,441 1,534.6 0.94 (0.89–0.99)
Northern Europe 106 158.82 0.67 (0.55–0.81) 96 163.44 0.59 (0.48–0.72)
Western Europe 164 322.76 0.51 (0.43–0.59) 310 515.03 0.60 (0.54–0.67)
Southern Europe 186 311.31 0.60 (0.51–0.69) 146 336.12 0.43 (0.37–0.51)
Eastern Europe 146 330.93 0.44 (0.37–0.52) 142 330.92 0.43 (0.36–0.51)
Former USSR 101 246.25 0.41 (0.33–0.50) 132 335.55 0.39 (0.33–0.47)
Middle East 269 424.41 0.63 (0.56–0.71) 135 367.42 0.37 (0.31–0.43)
Arab Middle East 89 143.07 0.62 (0.50–0.77) 28 119.35 0.23 (0.16–0.34)
Non-Arab Middle East 180 281.34 0.64 (0.55–0.74) 107 248.06 0.43 (0.35–0.52)
*

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Table 5 presents deaths due to cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). CVA deaths in immigrant men are similar to the US-born NHW, except for higher PMR in men from the Southern and Eastern Europe. In women, CVA deaths are significantly lower in most population groups, similar in those from the Arabian Middle East and Eastern Europe, and slightly higher in those from Southern Europe.

Table 5.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

Cerebrovascular accidents Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 41,050 62,443
Anglo-Saxon 1,192 1,196.4 1.00 (0.94–1.05) 2,074 2,217.6 0.94 (0.90–0.98)
Northern Europe 142 141.97 1.00 (0.84–1.18) 207 253.49 0.82 (0.71–0.94)
Western Europe 277 291.3 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 634 700.55 0.91 (0.84–0.98)
Eastern Europe 343 302.58 1.13 (1.02–1.26) 501 506.65 0.99 (0.90–1.08)
Southern Europe 352 293.38 1.20 (1.08–1.33) 659 604.12 1.09 (1.01–1.18)
Former USSR 250 246.54 1.01 (0.89–1.15) 510 560.22 0.91 (0.83–0.99)
Middle East 397 406.2 0.98 (0.88–1.08) 444 499.36 0.89 (0.81–0.98)
Arab Middle East 125 123.06 1.02 (0.85–1.21) 127 127.99 0.99 (0.83–1.18)
Non-Arab Middle East 272 283.13 0.96 (0.85–1.08) 317 371.36 0.85 (0.76–0.95)

Table 6 presents deaths from pneumonia and influenza. The PMR for this cause of death suggests that pneumonia death in all immigrant populations is uniformly similar to that of the US-born NHW, except for men from Western Europe in whom this cause of death is significantly lower.

Table 6.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

Pneumonia/influenza Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 33,417 40,822
Anglo-Saxon 941 936.97 1.00 (0.94–1.07) 1,394 1,387.6 1.00 (0.95–1.06)
Northern Europe 105 105.98 0.99 (0.81–1.20) 172 161.58 1.06 (0.91–1.24)
Western Europe 170 215.76 0.79 (0.67–0.92) 403 437.68 0.92 (0.83–1.02)
Eastern Europe 231 228.35 1.01 (0.89–1.15) 323 322.06 1.00 (0.90–1.12)
Southern Europe 206 225.82 0.91 (0.79–1.05) 369 396.26 0.93 (0.84–1.03)
Former USSR 185 198.03 0.93 (0.80–1.08) 326 361.35 0.90 (0.81–1.01)
Middle East 294 312.69 0.94 (0.84–1.05) 291 309.34 0.94 (0.84–1.06)
Arab Middle East 84 86.56 0.97 (0.77–1.20) 61 75.26 0.81 (0.62–1.04)
Non-Arab Middle East 210 226.13 0.93 (0.81–1.06) 230 234.09 0.98 (0.86–1.12)

Table 7 presents deaths from AIDS and HIV infection. This table reveals noteworthy differences by sex and area of birth. In women, the numbers are too small to generate reliable estimates. In men, those with Anglo-Saxon ancestry, and Western Europe have higher PMR while those from Northern Europe are not any different, and all other groups have significantly lower PMR for this cause.

Table 7.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

HIV/AIDS Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 26,940 983
Anglo-Saxon 465 410.01 1.13 (1.03–1.24) 15 17.834 0.84 (0.47–1.39)
Northern Europe 60 50.92 1.18 (0.90–1.52) 7 2.315 3.02 (1.21–6.20)
Western Europe 285 243.59 1.17 (1.04–1.31) 13 10.881 1.19 (0.64–2.04)
Southern Europe 90 117.41 0.77 (0.62–0.94) 1 3.302 0.30 (0.00–1.53)
Eastern Europe 49 105.99 0.46 (0.34–0.61) 2 3.84 0.52 (0.06–1.82)
Former USSR 12 88.64 0.14 (0.07–0.24) 0 4.143
Middle East 122 298.09 0.41 (0.34–0.49) 6 10.698 0.56 (0.20–1.21)
Arab Middle East 70 137.7 0.51 (0.40–0.64) 4 4.837 0.83 (0.22–2.09)
Non-Arab Middle East 52 160.39 0.32 (0.24–0.43) 2 5.86 0.34 (0.04–1.19)

Table 8 presents the PMR for suicide. Except for women from Southern Europe and Arabian Countries, suicide seem to be significantly higher in all other immigrant men and women in this study.

Table 8.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

Suicide Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 20,441 5,483
Anglo-Saxon 426 75.42 5.65 (5.12–6.21) 145 33.97 4.27 (3.60–5.02)
Northern Europe 61 9.75 6.25 (4.78–8.03) 20 4.16 4.81 (2.94–7.43)
Western Europe 236 42.85 5.51 (4.83–6.26) 106 18.84 5.63 (4.61–6.80)
Southern Europe 82 21.51 3.81 (3.03–4.73) 11 7.07 1.56 (0.78–2.78)
Eastern Europe 143 20.31 7.04 (5.93–8.29) 43 7.51 5.73 (4.15–7.72)
Former USSR 95 21.48 4.42 (3.58–5.41) 28 8.68 3.23 (2.14–4.66)
Middle East 143 58.5 2.44 (2.06–2.88) 38 21.11 1.80 (1.27–2.47)
Arab Middle East 50 25.46 1.96 (1.46–2.59) 13 8.53 1.52 (0.81–2.60)
Non-Arab Middle East 93 33.04 2.81 (2.27–3.45) 25 12.58 1.99 (1.29–2.93)

Table 9 presents deaths due to diabetes. Except for women with Anglo-Saxon ancestry and Northern European men who seem to have lower mortality. Men and women from the Middle East, both Arabs and non-Arabs, and Southern Europe, as well as men from Eastern Europe have significantly higher PMR for this cause of death.

Table 9.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

Diabetes Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 12,057 12,344
Anglo-Saxon 280 314.72 0.89 (0.79–1.00) 318 405.81 0.78 (0.70–0.87)
Northern Europe 28 42.1 0.67 (0.44–0.96) 33 44.96 0.73 (0.51–1.03)
Western Europe 81 93.93 0.86 (0.68–1.07) 139 145.41 0.96 (0.80–1.13)
Southern Europe 107 82.34 1.30 (1.06–1.57) 174 90.47 1.92 (1.65–2.23)
Eastern Europe 106 86.98 1.22 (1.00–1.47) 103 88.05 1.17 (0.95–1.42)
Former USSR 75 62.78 1.19 (0.94–1.50) 101 89.2 1.13 (0.92–1.38)
Middle East 195 121.38 1.61 (1.39–1.85) 190 104.33 1.82(1.57–2.10)
Arab Middle East 86 45.48 1.89 (1.51–2.34) 73 35.74 2.04 (1.60–2.57)
Non-Arab Middle East 109 75.9 1.44 (1.18–1.73) 117 68.58 1.71 (1.41–2.04)

Table 10 presents deaths due to homicide. The PMR for homicide suggest that this cause of death is significantly less common among NHW immigrants in California.

Table 10.

Proportionate mortality ratio in first generation NHW immigrants, selected area of birth, California, 1989–1999

Homicide Male
Female
Place of birth OBS EXP PMR (95% CI) OBS EXP PMR (95% CI)
NHW US-born 5,519 1,971
Anglo-Saxon 60 375.35 0.16 (0.12–0.21) 43 126.05 0.34 (0.25–0.46)
Northern Europe 5 49.8 0.10 (0.03–0.23) 2 16.17 0.12 (0.01–0.43)
Western Europe 57 170.49 0.33 (0.25–0.43) 31 65.84 0.47 (0.32–0.67)
Southern Europe 25 104.56 0.24 (0.15–0.35) 10 24.93 0.40 (0.19–0.74)
Eastern Europe 30 103.18 0.29 (0.20–0.41) 13 27.29 0.48 (0.25–0.81)
USSR 54 88.1 0.61 (0.46–0.80) 7 27.73 0.25 (0.10–0.52)
Middle East 157 224.91 0.70(0.59–0.82) 35 58.95 0.59 (0.41–0.83)
Arab Middle East 83 96.13 0.86 (0.69–1.07) 12 25.05 0.48 (0.25–0.84)
Non-Arab Middle East 74 128.78 0.57 (0.45–0.72) 23 33.9 0.68 (0.43–1.02)

Analysis of the other causes of deaths revealed less clear associations with the place of birth.

Accidents

There were 1,773 deaths in men and 1,018 deaths in women immigrants. None of the PMRs calculated for men and women of immigrant groups showed any statistically significant deviation.

Cirrhosis of The Liver

There were 812 deaths in men and 599 deaths in women. The PMRs in Middle Eastern men and women, both Arabs and non-Arabs, and women from the former USSR are significantly lower. Women with Anglo-Saxon ancestry and those from Western Europe were the only immigrant groups with higher death for this cause.

Hypertensive Diseases

There were 194 deaths in men and 333 deaths in women that were attributed to hypertensive diseases. There was no association with immigration, except for women from the former USSR in whom the PMR was 0.59 and significantly different.

Nephritis

There were 271 deaths in men and 310 deaths in women. No association with immigration was detected except for men and women from the Middle East in whom the PMR was significantly higher.

Stomach and Duodenal Ulcers

There were 157 deaths in men and 214 deaths in women. PMRs for men and women from Southern Europe were significantly low. All other groups were similar.

All other Causes of Deaths

There were 5,474 deaths in men and 7,593 deaths in women. The PMRs for all other causes of death were significantly low in immigrants from Eastern Europe, former USSR, and the Middle East, both Arabs and non-Arabs. For all other immigrant groups, the PMR were not significant.

Discussion

This report presents an analysis of mortality patterns in the first generation NHW immigrants in California in comparison with the US-born NHW residents of California as the standard population. Selection of non-Hispanic records reduced the total number of cases of the first generation immigrants in this study by 1,547 deaths or 1.4%, whereas in the standard population the reduction was 111,478 records or 7.5%. Thus, the standard population for this analysis is the most appropriate comparison and does not include the Hispanic populations who generally have lower mortality rates. Moreover, by expanding the standard population to include all US-born NHW individuals, these results can easily be compared with similar studies in other parts of the US. Few significant mortality patterns are identified by this research. First, there is virtually no difference between the first generation white immigrants and the NHW US-born in risk of dying from acute infectious diseases such as pneumonia and influenza or nephritis with the exception of immigrants from the Middle East. Second, major differences exist in mortality from those causes that relate to behavior and are associated with social environment. Death from suicide is significantly higher in the immigrant population regardless of their sex or origin, while death from homicide is significantly lower. This observation tends to run contrary to results obtained in Canada [25] and the US [26] that indicates lower suicide rate among the first generation immigrants. This discrepancy may be an artifact due to the statistical method, or a reflection of the refinement of the immigrant and comparison groups used in this analysis. In both Canadian and US study, the immigrants were considered as one big group of “foreign born” and there are indications that suicide vary significantly among immigrants from various parts of the world. Third, mortality from chronic diseases that begin early in life and are amenable to early detection and prevention such as diseases of the heart is generally higher in the first generation immigrant populations. Other studies have also shown higher incidence and deaths due to coronary heart disease in the first generation immigrants in Europe [7], Israel [27], and the US [28]. Fourth, deaths associated with COPD, a significant sequel of long-term smoking, are significantly lower in the first generation white immigrants. This may reflect lower prevalence of smoking among the NHW immigrants.

For other causes of death, including cancers, the observed patterns are mixed and require further analyses. However a North/South divide is noticed for deaths due to diabetes and HIV/AIDS. Immigrants from Northern and Western Europe have lower deaths due to diabetes, while immigrants from Southern Europe, and the Middle East have higher deaths for this cause. Death from AIDS/HIV infection in men follows a pattern that is opposite to diabetes. It is higher in men and women with Anglo-Saxon ancestry and those from Western and Northern Europe, while it is lower in immigrants from Eastern Europe, former USSR and the Middle East.

This report provides an insight to the ethnic discrepancies in mortality within the NHW population. It suggests significant differences between Middle Eastern immigrants and those from Europe, and between North and South in Europe. It is reported both from the US [12] and Israel [29] that mortality in immigrants can influence the mortality rates of the host country and this needs to be considered in disease control planning. In the currents study, the number of NHW immigrants is not high enough to exert any significant modifying effect, except for immigrants with Anglo-Saxon ancestry who are the largest group and may have some modify effect on the overall mortality statistics in California.

This study has some limitations. First, it is based on the information obtained from the death certificates. Although death certificates are widely used for descriptive epidemiological studies, their accuracy in identification of the underlying cause of death has been questioned. The difference in dying from a disease or dying with a disease seems to be the main source of confusion. A study by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute has concluded that the accuracy of coronary heart disease as an underlying cause of death was only 80% [30]. Such inaccuracies have also been reported for other causes of death, particularly for cancers [31, 32]. However, there is no reason to believe that such errors are limited to the first generation immigrants and could seriously bias the results of this analysis. The second issue with the use of mortality data is the impact of access to proper healthcare for early diagnosis and treatment that is closely associated with immigration status. Many of the first generation immigrants may not have ready access to health insurance and proper care. Thus, it is difficult to determine if the observed patterns are due to inherent ethnic differences in the natural history of these diseases, or are a result of access to healthcare services. The third concern with mortality data in immigrant populations is the concept of “salmon bias” that suggests the return of the first generation immigrants to their home country following the diagnosis of a severe or terminal disease. This bias was first suggested to explain the Hispanic mortality advantage in the US [33], and was later suggested to explain the mortality advantages of the Mediterranean immigrants in Europe [34]. The possible impact of this bias cannot be determined with the current analysis.

Another limitation of this study is that the standard population does include second or third generation NHW immigrants who are born in the US into immigrant ancestry. Although it is known that acculturation to the host country tends to modify the disease patterns in second or third generation immigrants, the presence of individuals with various ancestry reduces the homogeneity of the standard population. In the current study, 40% of the first generation immigrants are from Anglo-Saxon ancestry. It is reasonable to assume that a large segment of the standard population used in this study is also from Anglo-Saxon ancestry. This situation may have a modifying effect on some of the PMRs presented here, particularly for immigrants from Europe. However, the extent of this modification cannot be determined in the present study.

The choice of PMR for statistical analysis in this study is dictated by the lack of denominator population for rate calculations. Although PMR is not as robust as rates, it can detect significant differences among various populations with reasonable accuracy [35] and can provide convincing basis for future research.

Conclusions

This study shows that the NHW cannot be considered a homogeneous group in epidemiological studies. The reported results can be used for developing research questions and hypotheses concerning findings that need further evaluation. This initial analysis provides solid evidence of significant ethnic variations in mortality patterns of the NHW population. It confirms that NHW sufficiently heterogeneous to warrant special studies. It also reveals that infectious, chronic, and social causes of death in the first generation immigrants conform to significantly different patterns that are worthy of further studies.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Bertram Kastenbaum, MS, MPH from the Office of the Chief Actuary, US SSA for providing the linked death certificated file used in this analysis. The author is also indebted to Paul Mills, PhD for constructive suggestions on the manuscript. This research was supported by the grant CA 103457 from the National Cancer Institute to Kiumarss Nasseri, PhD.

References

  • 1.Parkin DM, Khlat M. Studies of cancer in migrants: Rationale methodology. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A:761–71. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parkin DM, Steintiz R, Khlat M, Kaldor J, Katz L, Young J. Cancer in Jewish migrants to Israel. Int J Cancer. 1990;45:614–21. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910450407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geddes M, Balzi D, Buiatti E, Khlat M, Parkin DM. Cancer in Italian immigrants. Cancer Causes Control. 1991;2:133–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00053133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hemminki K, Li X, Czene K. Cancer risk in first-generation immigrants to Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2002;99:218–28. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bouchardy C, Khlat M, Mirra AP, Parkin DM. Cancer risk among European migrants in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A:1418–23. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90015-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCredie M, Williams S, Coates M. Cancer mortality in migrants from the British Isles and continental Europe to New South Wales, Australia, 1975–1995. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:179–85. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991008)83:2<179::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sundquist J, Johansson SE. The influence of country of birth on mortality from all causes and cardiovascular disease in Sweden 1979–1993. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26:279–87. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.2.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hemminki K, Li X. Cancer risks in second-generation immigrants to Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2002;99:229–37. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hemminki K, Li X. Cancer risks in childhood and adolescent among the offspring of immigrants to Sweden. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:1414–18. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nasseri K. Reengineering vital registration and statistics system [letter to the editor] Prev Chronic Dis. [serial online] 2005;2(1), http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/jan/04_0108,htm. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Stellman SD. Proportional mortality ratios among Korean immigrants to New York City, 1986–1990. Yonsei Med J. 1996;31:31–7. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1996.37.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seeff LC, McKenna MT. Cervical cancer mortality among foreign-born women living in the United States, 1985–1996. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27:203–8. doi: 10.1016/s0361-090x(03)00062-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.California Cancer Registry. Cancer Reporting in California: Abstracting and Coding Procedures for Hospitals, California Cancer Reporting System Standards. 7. I. Sacramento, CA: Revised January 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cockburn M, Deapen D, editors. Cancer Incidence and Mortality in California: Trends by Race/Ethnicity, 1988–2001. Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program; University of Southern California: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB, editors. Cancer incidence in five continents. VIII. IARC Scientific Publications No. 155; Lyon, France: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thom TJ, Epstein FH, Feldman JJ, Leaverton PE, Wolz M. Total mortality and mortality from heart disease, cancer, and stroke from 1950 to 1987 in 27 countries. NIH Publication No. 92-3088. Sep, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schwartz K, Kulwicki A, Weiss LK, Sakr W, Kau G, Severson RK. Cancer among Arab Americans in the metropolitan detroit area. Ethnic Dis. 2004;14:141–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sawaf H, Lorenzana A, Dombi G, Hamre M, Schwartz K. Childhood cancer among Arab Americans in southeast Michigan. Ethnic Dis. 2005;15(S1):13–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nasseri K. Enhancement of birthplace data in the death certificate master file: reclaiming missed data. J Registry Manage. 2005;32:32–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.California all cause mortality 1988–2000, DHS Center for Health Statistics Death Master Files, DOF population estimates, 1988–2000, 7/10/2002.
  • 21.International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, ICD-9-CM, 2nd ed., September 1980. US Department of Health and Human services, Public Health Service, Health Care Financing Administration.
  • 22.World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 10th Revision, Version for 2003. Accessible at: http://www3.who.int/icd/vol1htm2003/fr-icd.htm.
  • 23.Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1987. pp. 76–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gahlinger PM, Abramson JH. Computer Programs for Epidemiologic Analysis: PEPI Version 2. Stone Mountain, Georgia; USD Inc: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Strachan J, Johansen H, Nair C, Nrgundkar M. Canadian suicide mortality rates: first-generation immigrants versus Canadian-born. Health Rep. 1990;2:327–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Singh GK, Siahpush M. All-cause and cause-specific mortality in immigrants and native born in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:392–99. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.3.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gad R, Nurit I, Ada T, Ytzhak P. Chronic disease prevalence in immigrants to Israel from the former USSR. J Immigr Health. 2002;4:29–33. doi: 10.1023/A:1013007227469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Enas EA, Garg A, Davidson MA, Nair VM, Huet BA, Yusuf S. Coronary heart disease and its risk factors in first-generation immigrant Asian Indians to the United States of America. Indian Heart J. 1996;48:343–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rennert G. Implications of Russian immigration on mortality patterns in Israel. Int J Epidemiol. 1994;23:751–6. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.4.751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lloyd-Jones DM, Martin DO, Larson MG, Levy D. Accuracy of death certificates for coding heart disease as the cause of death. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:1020–6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Percy C, Stanek E, 3rd, Gloeckler L. Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics. Am J Public Health. 1981;71:242–50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.3.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Percy C, Ries LG, Van Holten VD. The accuracy of liver cancer as the underlying cause of death on death certificates. Public Health Rep. 1990;105:361–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Franzini L, Ribble JC, Kaddie AM. Understanding the Hispanic paradox. Ethnic Dis. 2001;11:496–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Khlat M, Darmon N. Is there a Mediterranean migrants mortality paradox in Europe? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:1115–8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Aveyard P. A fresh look at proportional mortality ratio. Public Health. 1998;112:77–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES