Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2008 Mar 10;105(10):3668–3672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703105105

A 16-bit parallel processing in a molecular assembly

Anirban Bandyopadhyay 1,, Somobrata Acharya 1
PMCID: PMC2268776  PMID: 18332437

Abstract

A machine assembly consisting of 17 identical molecules of 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-1–4-benzoquinone (DRQ) executes 16 instructions at a time. A single DRQ is positioned at the center of a circular ring formed by 16 other DRQs, controlling their operation in parallel through hydrogen-bond channels. Each molecule is a logic machine and generates four instructions by rotating its alkyl groups. A single instruction executed by a scanning tunneling microscope tip on the central molecule can change decisions of 16 machines simultaneously, in four billion (416) ways. This parallel communication represents a significant conceptual advance relative to today's fastest processors, which execute only one instruction at a time.

Keywords: multilevel logic, parallel communication, self-assembly


A molecular machine is a system that generates physical motion of its components at the atomic level, controlled by an external stimulus (110). Several novel nanomachines have been realized over the last two decades by rearranging the constituent atoms of nature's building blocks, namely proteins (11, 12), DNA (13), and other compounds (1417). Researchers have sought to increase the number of versatile instructions and generate multiple operations by increasing the complexity of design via diverse assembly routes. However, a machine that can modulate the decisions of other machines or communicate with more than one system at a time has not yet been achieved. A major difficulty in realizing such a machine resides in transferring versatile instructions simultaneously at the molecular level in a well controlled manner, partly because such machines are beyond the reach of today's atomic-scale manipulation. Linear connection of machines allows implementation of only one instruction at a time. In contrast, the radial connection of machines originating from a central control would allow parallel communication similar to a synaptic channel, but this configuration has not been explored in reported machines. Construction of a machine to process parallel communication will require an encoded molecular assembler (MA) that will precisely position the operational molecules by weakly interacting bonds and translate multiple instructions.

Recently, we have realized a multilevel switch in 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-1–4-benzoquinone (duroquinone, DRQ) (Fig. 1A), which generates four logic states (0, 1, 2, and 3) within 7 Å when instructed by a suitable scanning tunneling microscope (STM) pulse. Each logic state is associated with particular rotation of alkyl groups, satisfying the requirement of a molecular machine. Here, we report a machine assembly consisting of 17 identical DRQs, wherein a single molecule simultaneously instructs 16 others, in 416 possible ways. This machine is made possible by a supramolecular architecture consisting of a ring of 16 analogous DRQs as execution units (EUs) around a single DRQ as central control unit (CCU). Hydrogen-bond channels originating from the CCU radially connect to the 16 EUs, providing synchronized one-to-many control of their states. Instructions are sent by STM pulse to the CCU, which in turn sends 16 unique instructions simultaneously to the 16 EUs. In this way, one can govern billions of decision-making instruction sets to control logic machines simultaneously. The goal of a nano-CPU is to control the independent operation of multiple machines from a control unit. To demonstrate this ability in principle, we have performed density functional theory (DFT) simulations interfacing eight recently invented nanomachines externally to these 16 logic machines and operated them by CCU. The simulated operation shows that all 24 machines respond simultaneously to a single instruction given to the CCU [see discussion on multiple machine operation in the supporting information (SI) Text and SI Movie 1]. These external machines retain their functionalities even in this greater assembly, demonstrating that our basic 17-DRQ assembly can function as a nano-central processing unit in addition to its parallel communication capabilities.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Construction of molecular assembly. (A) Molecular structure of DRQ. (B) Growth process of DRQs recorded by scanning at −0.6 V with a tip current of 0.05 nA. The number of participant (NOP) molecules within the scanning area (5 × 5 nm2) is written in the upper-right corner. An unsuccessful attempt to insert a flat DRQ into the 12 NOP ring is shown along with similar effective attempt with 16 NOP. (Scale bar: 7 Å.) (C) Perspective view of theoretically generated STM image of final machine assembly. The identified molecular structure is placed on top. (D) Three-dimensional STM image shows nearly equal inner area of single DRQ with maximum diameter between 7 and 9 Å (green and yellow ring, lower-left Inset). The yellow line connects virtual centers of magic-numbered assemblies. Below each 3D STM image is shown the resolved molecular architecture, where two white lines connect O-O axes of two consecutive DRQs generating an angle θ at virtual center V. (Red scale bar: 7 Å.) A detailed demonstration of architecture formation is provided in SI Text.

We have constructed the machine assembly using 17 identical, randomly distributed DRQs, on an Au(111) surface, deposited in an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) STM chamber at 77 K. The approaching paths of the DRQs were monitored within 5 × 5 nm2 by scanning at −0.6 V at an interval of 30 sec where the number of participating DRQs was varied from 1 to 21. For “magic” numbers of participating DRQs (4, 6, 8, 12, 16), the motions gradually attenuated into a circular or horseshoe-like semicircular ring. For other numbers of participants between 4 and 21, we did not observe any self-convergence from random initial distributions of DRQs (Fig. 1 B and D). The magic assemblies arise from geometric constraints: 4 DRQs form a square; 6 form a hexagon, whereas odd numbers of participants favor random-chain formation. For 8, 12, and 16 participants, formation of a semicircle with an opening in the circumference is observed (Fig. 1 A and C). Interestingly, for 16 participants, when an additional DRQ is inserted through this opening into the center of semicircle (Fig. 1B), within a scan of ≈10 sec the inserted DRQ reaches the center and completes the circle as a molecular assembler (Fig. 1 A–C). The molecular compositions of all architectures were confirmed by comparing theoretical STM images generated from the appropriately oriented molecular assembly on Au (Fig. 1C).

The supramolecular assembly configures itself to integrate more DRQs in a characteristic way (Fig. 1D). Equivalent molecular structures generated from computed STM images show that the assembly with six DRQs remains in a flat configuration (benzene plane at 7° with Au). When eight or more DRQs are brought within the 5 × 5-nm2 area, the assembly switches from flat to edge-on configuration (molecular plane at 70° with Au) and the diameter increases from 1.6 nm to 2.2 nm. As the number of participants approaches 16, the diameter of the assembly saturates at ≈2.5 nm (Fig. 1C). This nearly constant diameter for assemblies between 8 and 16 results from the necessity of minimizing angular momentum for the integrity of the assembly (deciding relation is 2πrkL, where r is the radius of the ring, L is the width of the molecule, and k is the number of molecules). Notably, the nearly constant inner periphery of the semicircular ring corresponds to a single DRQ area, providing architectures with a virtual control center, V (Fig. 1C).

To keep the constant radius observed in larger assemblies, the DRQs are lifted up to accommodate more participants (lift-up process in SI Text and Fig. 5). DFT computations show that in the flat configuration (0.68 nm × 0.71 nm, height 0.18 nm), the dipolar potential has continuous rotational symmetry around the dipolar axis, and there is no interaction between neighbors.§ In the edge-on configuration (0.18 nm × 0.71 nm, height 0.68 nm), inner alkyls are coupled with neighbors and the outer alkyls are free to rotate because the hydrogen bonds are localized only within the inner alkyls (see localization of hydrogen bond in SI Text). Because the freedom of functional groups inside of each molecule is restricted in two different ways, each EU functions as two independent functional moieties of ≈3 Å each.

When an additional flat DRQ is inserted inside of the semicircle made by 16 participants, the inserted DRQ moves to the center automatically and forms hydrogen bonds with the peripheral DRQs along the O-O axis (Fig. 2A). During insertion, oxygen is always facing the opening and the O-O axis does not intersect with the semicircular pattern. The radial forces generated by the hydrogen bonds reconstruct the semicircular structure into a circular one. A higher density of hydrogen bonds along the O-O axis in the final architecture is the signature of this reconstruction (Fig. 2A, marked by arrow). The hydrogen-bond network between 16 inner peripheral oxygen atoms and the central DRQ forms the communication channels (PCs), shown by green channels in Fig. 2A. A supramolecular architecture has a typical bond length between H and another electronegative atom and a closely associated angle beyond which H bond network in the architecture is feasible. In this assembly, this cut-off bond length is ≈0.3 nm, and the associated threshold bond angle is 36°. As this network is formed, all 18 inner oxygens arrange in a negative isopotential ring while keeping the 16 outer oxygen atoms isolated (Fig. 2B; see locking of architecture in SI Text). The hydrogen-bond network prevents the peripheral inner alkyls from rotating freely, whereas the outer alkyls, which do not contribute to the bonding network, rotate freely, enabling the EUs to switch among four states (Fig. 2 A and B; and see SI Movie 2). The functional independence of inter-DRQ coupling is further evident in the two isolated hydrogen-bond networks of inner and outer alkyls (blue nets in Fig. 2A). Consequently, the supramolecular structure has a central control unit (CCU) that can communicate simultaneously with all 16 outer DRQs (EUs) through hydrogen-bond channels (PCs). In SI Movie 4, the contrast of particular 16 bright spots blinks continuously as logic states change, which points to the conclusion that 16 bright spots contain electronically independent structures.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fundamentals of the architecture. (A) Molecular model of the architecture inside its van der Waals sphere (white color) showing three divisions: CCU, PC, and EU. Three kinds of hydrogen-bond communication channels are visualized: green lines connect 16 internal oxygen atoms of DRQ and CCU, orange lines connect external oxygen with CCU, and blue lines are the intermolecular coupling between EU DRQs (see SI Fig. 6 and SI Movie 2). Here, bond length is set at 7.4 Å and angle at 56°. (B) The iso-potential surfaces divide the architecture into two parts: green denotes positive potential and violet denotes negative potential. The central green area is the isolated potential island of control region C, and the outer violet clusters are the execution region E. In Inset, the dotted circle denotes inner alkyls, with an arrow pointing to the schematic of alkyl–alkyl coupling with two O–O connecting axes Y–Y′ and X–X′ making an angle θ at V. (C) Relative charge density (RCD) of the architecture as viewed from top (T) and bottom (B) (see SI Movie 3 for views from all directions). (D) Schematic of RCD features: top (T), middle (S), bottom (B) layers of iso-RCD disk when viewed horizontally. Two columns C and E are observed when viewed vertically. (E) The experimental scheme for STM pulse application on CCU (C) for control and on EUs (E) for read/write.

Fig. 2C shows a 3D relative charge density (RCD) generated by DFT calculations of the complete architecture, showing the distribution of electron-density channels connecting different atoms (20). The side view shows an ≈2-Å-wide, negatively charged layer (S) sandwiched between 3-Å-wide top and bottom layers (T and B) of positive charge-density distribution (for views from all directions, see the 3D RCD view in SI Movie 3). The CCU modulates the bottom inner alkyls (B) to write the instructions for EUs, while bits on the EUs are registered by rotation of the outer alkyls at the top layer (T), as is evident in the RCD profile (Fig. 2 C and D). Additionally, Fig. 2 C and D shows two isolated circular regions from the top view, one with a diameter of 18 Å (C) where CCU operation takes place and another with diameter 18–21 Å (E) where EU operation takes place. The coexistence of three isolated layers from top to bottom (T, S, and B) and two functional divisions (C and E) allows the architecture to execute parallel processing with multiple functionalities (Fig. 2D). When a bit is written on the outer oxygen of an EU, it stores 1.2%, 2.0%, 1.0%, and 2.5% more negative charge than its counterpart oxygen for 0, 1, 2, and 3 states, respectively; neutral DRQ oxygen shares 33% of total electronic charge. As a result, the central isopotential disk S and central division C containing the CCU are not affected. The change in relative charge pushes EUs radially inward or outward by 0.2, −0.1, and 0.3 nm to register 1, 2, and 3 bits locally while maintaining the integrity of the architecture (negative sign denotes motion toward CCU).

Fixing the STM tip on the outer oxygen atoms of the EUs using the point-contact method, 2-μs pulses were applied to write/erase four logic states 0 (−0.7 V), 1 (1.3 V), 2 (1.5 V), and 3 (1.7 V) (Fig. 2E). The states are read by measuring conductances at 0.2 V. Writing any one among 0, 1, 2, and 3 to each of the 16 EUs produces a 16-bit instruction array; nearly 200 dissimilar arrays have been registered for four given CCU states. For a defined array (e.g., 3012032110231322) switching the CCU (from 2 to 3, for example) by applying a suitable pulse changes electron density at distinct atomic sites in the CCU. Because CCU oxygen atoms are coupled to the inner isopotential oxygen ring, the oxygen ring's overall charge distribution changes significantly, along with the strength of the hydrogen-bond PCs. To reach equilibrium, certain EUs change their conformation permanently; an external pulse can no longer change their state. Consequently, these bits of the instruction array are fixed, whereas the remaining autonomous bits can still be governed by instructions given by STM pulse. Thus, writing bits to the EUs stores bits locally without changing the state of the CCU and preserves their states unless the CCU instructs them to switch into a new state.

Using these properties, particular instructions can be selectively inserted in the 16-bit signal array by applying a single STM pulse to the CCU as demonstrated in Fig. 3. Four particular instruction arrays were written on EUs for CCU bits 0, 1, 2, and 3, and corresponding changes in the STM images were recorded. These changes were reproduced in the computed local density of states (LDOS) profiles by considering four DRQ conformers, generating the equivalent molecular structure of the whole architecture during machine operation. This allows the RCD to be computed, revealing the spatial modulation of electron-density channels during real-time operation. Changes in the hydrogen-bond network during operation are manifested in the tube-like electron-density channels, which traverse across TSB layers and CE divisions (for two-dimensional representation, see Fig. 2 C and D and the three-dimensional view presented in the SI Movie 3) in four distinct ways. Top and side views of the RCD provide direct evidence that the electron-density channels are continuously reconstructed during operation. However, out of four billion choices statistically, we found regeneration of four typical dynamics; snapshots of iso-density channels are shown in Fig. 3 Right.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Operation of the machine assembly. Rows A–D demonstrate architectures for CCU code 0, 1, 2, and 3. The first column shows architectures for a particular sequential code on EUs with 0011032300210322 for CCU (0), 2210223122102230 for CCU (1), 2310232033201301 for CCU (2), and 1100332200331122 for CCU (3). The black dots denote the first bit in the sequence. The second column shows the STM images with tip current 50 pA for the above logic codes, where ranking starts from white dots. (Scale bar: 7 Å.) The larger area around machine assembly is shown in SI Fig. 7 in SI Text. The third column shows the top view of RCD plots scaled blue to red, −0.144 to 0.655 Ry. The fourth column shows the horizontal view of RCD plots. Arrows in the third column show the direction of horizontal view. The white line in the third and fourth columns shows iso-RCD tubes with circles at each end. The red circle is on the top layer T, and the green circle is in bottom layer B as described in Fig. 2 C and D.

The selective and parallel modulation of multiple decisions on EUs by a single pulsed instruction to the CCU is demonstrated in Fig. 4. Specifically, a particular array is changed by switching the CCU from state 2 to 0, 1, or 3; after the 2 → 3 transition, CCU is switched back to state 2. A single instruction to the CCU generates 16 particular instructions to the EUs, instructing some to function independently and fixing others to a particular state. All 16 EUs can be permanently fixed by the X → 3 transition (X = 0, 1, 2, or 3); alternately, all 16 can be instructed to operate freely by the X → 2 transition (Fig. 4C). These are the two limiting cases for this unique 16-bit parallel processing. For an advanced application, we have written 40 different random 16-bit instruction sequences on the EUs and simultaneously changed the CCU codes (Fig. 4; and see details in SI Movie 3). From this operation, we have constructed a truth table for the machine. Total number of 16-bit array is halved if C2 mirror symmetry is considered based on H bond network. However, for practical application, we consider that all ring molecules are distinguishable.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Truth table of the machine assembly. (A) Initial information content in the machine-assembly schematically. The “bolt” denotes the point where a single external instruction is applied. (B) The 16 parallel instructions generated by the CCU. Green instructions are signals to set corresponding EUs free, and other colors denote instructions for permanent changes to relevant EUs. (C) Truth table, demonstrating true parallel processing operation with X = 0, 1, 2, 3, and Xi (i = 1–8) for the coupled states. For CCU state X → 0, 4 bits (blue) are manipulated with a single instruction; for CCU state X → 1, 8 bits (violet) are manipulated with a single instruction; for CCU state X → 2, all 16 EUs are set free (white); and for CCU state X → 3, all 16 bits are manipulated into eight pairs of consecutive EUs permanently with a single instruction. (D) STM images of machine operation in a 5 × 5-nm2 area at 0.2 V and a 0.05-nA tip current. Starting from a random 16-bit array written on EUs, the CCU was switched randomly among states 0, 1, 2, and 3 a total of 40 times (see real-time operation in SI Movie 4). The real changes in the EUs (red, yellow) and their environment (green) are shown for six CCU switching events for particular final CCU states.

When the CCU is switched to the neutral state (0), the 0 state is permanently imposed on the four EUs nearest to the CCU oxygen atoms, irrespective of the initial 16-bit array. The DFT calculations suggest that a stronger network between the CCU and these four EUs fixes them in the same state (0) as the CCU (Fig. 3A). It is possible to write any of the four different states independently on the remaining 12 EUs, which could generate 412 instruction arrays.

When the CCU is switched to state 1, it permanently encodes state 2 in every second pair of EUs [X → 2 (X = 0, 1, 2, 3)]; this state corresponds to the neutral DRQ (Fig. 4B). The DFT calculations suggest that charge is distributed in iso-DOS clusters at four symmetric positions on the ring. The resulting configuration has eight EUs coupled to the CCU and eight independent EUs. The eight independent EUs can generate 48 independent decision sets encoded with state 2. STM images of all six arrays show iso-LDOS clusters at these positions (Fig. 4B).

When the CCU is switched to state 2, the central DRQ relaxes to another neutral conformation and the dipole moment is reduced from 1.8D to 0.62D. The DFT calculations reveal a homogeneous RCD distribution (Fig. 3C), and the decoupled EUs are free to switch among any of the four logic states, as shown by the isolated LDOS clusters in the STM image. Therefore, in principle, all 16 bits, comprising 416 decision sets, could be set free from any CCU control.

When the CCU is switched to state 3 (doubly reduced state), the electron density of the inner ring increases significantly. DFT calculations show the PCs reorienting to a new equilibrium with one to two correspondences. Each pair of adjacent EUs is strongly coupled and acquires the same logic state, choosing the smaller of the two initial states. Therefore, irrespective of the initial 16-bit array, eight pairs of decisions are permanently fixed. Six of the 48 possible arrays are shown in Fig. 4D. The associated truth table is summarized in circular form; however, a classical presentation is available in SI Table 1. All 16 ring molecules are assigned a rank from 0 to 15 to construct a 16-bit arrayed instruction. We select a particular molecule as the most significant bit (MSB) and another as the least significant bit (LSB). Therefore, the decision-sets calculated above are distinct, even if the structure is symmetric.

Finally, we note that the negative charge and radial motion of isolated EU oxygen atoms modulate the neighboring electron-density ripples, changing their height and period (20, 24) (Fig. 4). Consequently, every 16-bit array has a characteristic signature extending around the machine. This provides further evidence that we have built an assembly wherein we instruct 1 molecule at the center and 16 molecules in the ring are instructed at once in a logical way. The concept of simultaneous one-to-many communication could be generalized in building massive supramolecular architecture wherein parallel signal processing would be established.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.

A.B. acknowledges Kazushi Miki and Yutaka Wakayama for their support. We dedicate this article to Prof. Yoshio Bando on his 60th birthday; the dedication accounts for his regular internal reviews and critical suggestions for this nano-brain project. This work was supported through a special coordination fund from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of the Japanese Government.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0703105105/DC1.

DRQ alkyls rotate like machines with change in logic states 0 → 1 (120°), 1 → 2 (60°), and 2 → 3 (60°). DRQ single molecule demonstrates double negative differential resistance (NDR) peaks, which creates four different states; two neutral (state 0 and state 2) and two negatively charged either by one (state 1) or by two electrons (state 3). These multiple states of quinones are well known since long time. The previous reports can be found in ref. 18. For detailed RAM, ROM operations of DRQ, see ref. 19. The structural details and STM images of the four states can be found in ref. 20. Similar to DRQ, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (or DDQ) switches between any four conformers in ≈1 μs and remembers a state for ≈8 min in an isolated form. Four states in quinones are also confirmed by cyclic voltammetry measurements and simultaneous electronic and optical studies (21). The DRQ is deposited on a reconstructed Au(111) substrate by using a single-crystal gold (99.99+%) substrate reconstructed by annealing the crystal at 700 K for 30 min, followed by Ar sputtering for 30 min (the cycle was repeated five to six times). The DRQ was evaporated from a K-cell at a 100-K substrate temperature in an ultrahigh vacuum STM (10−8 torr) by thermal evaporation from a source kept at 383 K (the melting point for DRQ is 383 K) with an exposure of 15 min.

§

The minimum energy structure and conformational search for the single molecule, dimer, linear, and circular chains, orientation of the molecules on a gold surface, and electronic properties were studied following ab initio Hartree–Fock and DFT computation at the B3LYP level with a 6-311G** basis set. The repulsion during architecture formation is modeled by combining an exponential repulsion with an attractive dispersion interaction (1/R6), EvanderWaals = ΣiΣjε(290000e−12.5/R − 2.25R−6, where R = rij/(Ri + Rj). The parameters are as follows: Ri and Rj are the van der Waals radii for the atoms, epsilon (ε) determines the depth of the attractive potential energy well, and rij is the actual distance between the atoms. At short distances, the above equation favors the repulsive interaction over a dispersive interaction. To compensate for this favor at short distances (R = 3.311), the term EvanderWaals is replaced with EvanderWaals = 336.176ΣiΣjεR−2. The architecture minimization is repeated until the simulation converges into well observed architecture.

Once architecture is determined, the relative 3D spatial distribution of relative charge density is calculated by DFT, using numerical orbitals double zeta potentials (DZP), with local density approximation (LDA-PZ) and mesh cut-off at 150 Ry. Strict convergence of Hamiltonian at 10−5 critical limit was employed during computation.

We fix the STM tip as suggested in ref. 22 and then the point-contact measurements as suggested in ref. 23.

References

  • 1.Koumura N, Zijlstra RWJ, van Delden RA, Harada N, Feringa BL. Light-driven monodirectional molecular rotor. Nature. 1999;401:152–155. doi: 10.1038/43646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yan H, Zhang XP, Shen ZY, Seeman NC. A robust DNA mechanical device controlled by hybridization topology. Nature. 2002;415:62–65. doi: 10.1038/415062a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Badjic JD, Balzani V, Credi A, Silvi S, Stoddart JF. A molecular elevator. Science. 2004;303:1845–1849. doi: 10.1126/science.1094791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hess H, Bachand GD, Vogel V. Powering nanodevices with biomolecular motors. Chem Eur J. 2004;10:2110–2116. doi: 10.1002/chem.200305712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Browne WR, Feringa BL. Making molecular machines work. Nat Nanotechnol. 2006;1:25–35. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2006.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kay ER, Leigh DA. Lighting up nanomachines. Nature. 2006;440:286–287. doi: 10.1038/440286b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Drexler KE. Building molecular machine systems. Trends Biotechnol. 1999;17:5–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fletcher SP, Dumur F, Pollard MM, Feringa BL. A reversible, unidirectional molecular rotary motor driven by chemical energy. Science. 2005;310:80–82. doi: 10.1126/science.1117090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Collier CP, et al. A [2]-catenane-based solid-state electronically reconfigurable switch. Science. 2000;289:1172–1175. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hounshell WD, Johnson CA, Guenzi A, Cozzi F, Mislow K. Stereochemical consequences of dynamic gearing in substituted bis (9-triptycyl) methanes and related molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:6961–6964. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.6961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dolezal P, Likic V, Tachezy J, Lithgow T. Evolution of the molecular machines for protein import into mitochondria. Science. 2006;313:314–316. doi: 10.1126/science.1127895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mehta AD, Rief M, Spudich JA, Smith DA, Simmons RM. Single-molecule biomechanics with optical methods. Science. 1999;283:1689–1691. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5408.1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ding B, Seeman NC. Operation of a DNA robot arm inserted into a 2D DNA crystalline substrate. Science. 2006;314:1583–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.1131372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bustamante C, Keller D, Oster G. The physics of molecular motors. Acc Chem Res. 2001;34:412–420. doi: 10.1021/ar0001719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khuong TV, Nunez JE, Godinez CE, Garcia-Garibay MA. Crystalline molecular machines: A quest toward solid-state dynamics and function. Acc Chem Res. 2006;39:413–422. doi: 10.1021/ar0680217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Soong RK, et al. Powering an inorganic nanodevice with a biomolecular motor. Science. 2000;290:1555–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5496.1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jian H, Tour JM. En route to surface-bound electric field-driven molecular motors. J Org Chem. 2003;68:5091–5103. doi: 10.1021/jo034169h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carter FL. Molecular Electronic Devices II. New York: Dekker; 1983. pp. 543–550. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bandyopadhyay A, Miki K, Wakayama Y. Writing and erasing information in multilevel logic systems of a single molecule using scanning tunneling microscope. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;89:243506. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bandyopadhyay A, Miki K. Fabrication of memory chip in a complete self-assembly process using state-of-the-art multilevel cell (MLC) technology. Adv Funct Mater. 2007 in press. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bandyopadhyay A, Chowdhury A, Pal AJ. Mechanism of conductance switching: An optical investigation. Opt Mater. 2006;28:1432–1436. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stipe BC, Rezaei MA, Ho W. Inducing and viewing the rotational motion of a single molecule. Science. 1998;279:1907–1909. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5358.1907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu BQ, Tao NJ. Measurement of single-molecule resistance by repeated formation of molecular junctions. Science. 2003;301:1221–1223. doi: 10.1126/science.1087481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fujita D, et al. Anisotropic standing-wave formation on an Au(111)-(23×√3) reconstructed surface. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;78:3904–3907. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information
pnas_0703105105_4.pdf (20.2KB, pdf)
pnas_0703105105_1.pdf (272.6KB, pdf)
pnas_0703105105_2.pdf (148.1KB, pdf)
pnas_0703105105_3.pdf (29.8KB, pdf)
Download video file (2.1MB, avi)
Download video file (8.5MB, avi)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES