Skip to main content
Molecular Vision logoLink to Molecular Vision
. 2008 Mar 4;14:387–393.

Common MFRP sequence variants are not associated with moderate to high hyperopia, isolated microphthalmia, and high myopia

Ravikanth Metlapally 1,2, Yi-Ju Li 2, Khanh-Nhat Tran-Viet 2, Anuradha Bulusu 2, Tristan R White 2, Jaclyn Ellis 2, Daniel Kao 2, Terri L Young 1,2,
PMCID: PMC2268852  PMID: 18334955

Abstract

Purpose

The membrane-type frizzled-related protein (MFRP) gene is selectively expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium and ciliary body, and mutations of this gene cause nanophthalmos. The MFRP gene may not be essential for retinal function but has been hypothesized to play a role in ocular axial length regulation. The involvement of the MFRP gene in moderate to high hyperopic, isolated microphthalmic/anophthalmic, and high myopic patients was tested in two phases: a mutation screening/sequence variant discovery phase and a genetic association study phase.

Methods

Eleven hyperopic, ten microphthalmic/anophthalmic, and seven non-syndromic high-grade myopic patients of varying ages and 11 control subjects participated in the mutation screening phase. Sixteen primer pairs were designed to amplify the 13 exons of the MFRP gene including intron/exon boundaries. Polymerase chain reactions were performed, and amplified products were sequenced using standard techniques. Normal and affected individual DNA sequences were compared alongside the known reference sequence (UCSC genome browser) for the MFRP gene. The genetic association study included 146 multiplex non-syndromic high-grade myopia families. Seventeen intragenic and flanking single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were chosen for the MFRP gene and genotyped in the large data set using the Taqman® allelic discrimination assay. The family-based association Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (PDT) and GenoPDT were performed.

Results

The average spherical refractive error of the hyperopic patient cohort was +4.21 diopters (D; range +2.00 to +9.25 D) and of the myopic patient cohort was −12.36 D (range −8.25 to −14.50 D). A total of 16 SNPs were identified by direct sequencing. No significant association was determined between the 16 MFRP gene SNPs and the moderate to high hyperopia, microphthalmia/anophthalmia affection status, and high myopia. Family based association analysis did not reveal any association between the 17 SNPs genotyped in the larger family data set for any refractive error type.

Conclusions

Sequence variants of the MFRP gene do not appear to be associated with either the less severe forms of hyperopia, extreme forms of limited eye growth and development, or high myopia. These results indicate that the MFRP gene may not play a role in regulating ocular axial length in these phenotypes.

Introduction

The coordinated growth-related changes of various components of the eye are required to achieve and maintain emmetropia (the ideal refractive state). During this process of regulated ocular growth, the axial length (distance along the visual axis between cornea and retina) is a critical determinant of refractive status [1,2]. Disruption in the regulation of ocular growth results in the development of refractive error. It is now widely accepted that both environmental and genetic influences contribute to refractive error development. Recently, four independent mutations were identified in the membrane-type frizzled-related protein (MFRP) gene associated with nanophthalmos, a rare disorder of eye development characterized by extreme hyperopia (farsighted refractive error) [3]. Mutations in the MFRP gene have also been reported in a distinct autosomal recessive ophthalmic syndrome characterized by microphthalmos, retinitis pigmentosa, foveoschisis, and optic disc drusen [4].

MFRP is a gene that is selectively expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and ciliary body [3] and encodes a transmembrane receptor protein that contains a cysteine-rich domain (CRD) [5]. CRDs are binding motifs for wingless-type proteins (WNTs), a family of cell signaling molecules that mediate cell growth, differentiation, and development, and along with frizzled proteins, are implicated in eye development and disease ([6] for a detailed review). While Ayala-Ramirez et al. [4] stated that the MFRP gene is necessary for photoreceptor maintenance due to the severe rod-cone dystrophy of their patients, Sundin et al. [3] maintained that MFRP is not critical for retinal function. However, Sundin et al. [3] proposed a role for MFRP in the regulation of ocular axial length.

High hyperopia, microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and high myopia are all ocular disorders that present with altered ocular axial length. While microphthalmia and anophthalmia with very high hyperopia are rare and extreme phenotypes [7], moderate to high hyperopia [8] and high myopia ([9] for a detailed review) are relatively more prevalent. All of these conditions with high degrees of refractive error potentially result in secondary complications and visual loss. High degrees of hyperopia are associated with a narrow angle between the iris and cornea, an expansion of the choroidal vascular bed, choroidal folds, and thickened sclera [1012] and can lead to angle closure glaucoma and retinal detachment (RD). High myopia is frequently associated with cataract, glaucoma, retinal detachment, and posterior staphyloma with retinal degenerative changes including choroidal neovascularization [13,14]. In addition to pathology leading to visual loss, refractive error prevalence has a high public health and economic impact [15], thus, it is important to understand ocular growth regulation in refractive error development.

We hypothesized that the MFRP gene is important in the ocular axial length regulation of all types. In this study, we screened for sequence variants in the MFRP gene and tested for genetic association in moderate to high hyperopic, non-syndromic microphthalmic or anophthalmic, and non-syndromic high myopic patients. We sought to investigate whether sequence variants of MFRP are associated with less severe forms of hyperopia, other extreme forms of limited eye growth and development or high myopia and whether the MFRP gene plays a role in regulating ocular axial length in general.

Methods

Patient information

Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and total genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood using AutoPure LS® DNA Extractor and PUREGENE™ reagents (Gentra Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Duke University and followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Eleven moderate to high hyperopic subjects, 10 microphthalmic/anophthalmic patients, 11 control subjects, and seven high-grade myopic subjects of varying ages participated in the sequencing study. A large data set comprising of 146 multiplex families that included 634 subjects was used for the genotyping study. Those with systemic conditions and syndromic disorders that could predispose them to their refractive status were ruled out by an ophthalmic physician and geneticist if necessary.

Primers

The MFRP gene maps to chromosome 11q23.3 and spans the distance between genomic positions 118716837 and 118722580 (UCSC genome browser - Human Mar. 2006 [hg18] assembly). It is composed of 13 exons, and its genomic structure is detailed in Figure 1. Sixteen primer pairs were designed to amplify the identified 13 exons including the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (covering 50–150 base pairs [bp] of each intron-exon boundary; Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the genomic arrangement of MFRP on chromosome 11q23.3. The vertical boxes represent exons, the horizontal bars represent introns, and the arrow heads represent the direction of transcription (source; UCSC genome browser).

Table 1. MFRP gene primers for sequence variants’ screening.

Exon 5′-3′ Sequence Fragment size (bp) Chromosomal location
Exon1_F
CAGCTGAGTTGGATTAAGGGAC

118722259
Exon1_R
AGACTCAGGCTCGAAGGCAG
435
118722693
Exon2_F
CTTGTGCCATGAAGGACTTCTC

118722013
Exon2_R
CTGGAGAGCAGGAGGACACAG
429
118722441
Exon3_F
CAGCTCCCTGGCATGGTAAC

118721847
Exon3_R
CTCTGGAGGCGAGAAGATGG
360
118722206
Exon4_F
CTTCTCCTGGCTCTGTGTCC

118721553
Exon4_R
GCTGCAGAGATGGAGGTTAGAG
493
118722045
Exon5_F
ACAGTCCAGTGAGTACTGGGG

118721219
Exon5_R
CCCAGAGGTCTAGTCTCTCAATTTC
482
118721700
Exon6_F
AGAGCTCCCTGGGACATCAG

118720655
Exon6_R
GAACTCATCATGGGCACAGC
419
118721073
Exon7_F
GGTGAGTGTGTTCCCACCTG

118720437
Exon7_R
GACTGAGCAGGAAATGCTGAC
358
118720794
Exon8_F
CTTTGGCCCAGAACTTGTTTC

118720107
Exon8_R
CCGTCTGCTTGATCTCTGACC
327
118720433
Exon9_F
TGAAACCAGGTAAATTAAAGGTCC

118719592
Exon9_R
TTAGGGTGATGGTGAAGAGACC
447
118720038
Exon10_F
CAGACCCTAACCCTGTGTCTTC

118718595
Exon10_R
CACACCCTTACACCCTCCTG
465
118719059
Exon11_F
AATGCCACGGAGAGTAGGTG

118718370
Exon11_R
GTGAAGTGGTCCCAGAGTCAG
436
118718805
Exon12_F
ATCCTCTTGCTTCCTCACAACC

118717661
Exon12_R
AAATGCTGGTAGCAGGGCAG
374
118718034
Exon13_1_F
AGGAGGTGGTAGAGGTCCTCAG

118717426
Exon13_1_R
AAAAGAGGACGGGCAGGAAG
383
118717808
Exon13_2_F
CACCCCACTAGGCAGTGTTC

118717141
Exon13_2_R
ATCAAGGAAAAGGTCAGAAGGC
484
118717624
Exon13_3_F
GGGGAAGAGAAGTCCTCAGC

118716989
Exon13_3_R
CAGTGGCAGAGACCAAGGAC
353
118717341
Exon13_4_F
GCATCTATTCATGTGGCAGGC

118716657
Exon13_4_R TACTCCGGACCCTCCAGTTG 466 118717122

Sixteen primer pairs were designed to amplify all 13 exons of the MFRP gene covering 50–150 bp of each intron-exon boundary. “F” and “R” represent the forward and reverse primers, respectively. ‘bp’ – base pairs.

Sequencing analyses

Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed on genomic DNA using Platinum® Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA) using a touchdown protocol (available upon request). Amplicons were visualized by means of agarose gel electrophoresis and were purified with Quickstep™ 2 SOPE™ Resin (Edge BioSystems, Gaithersburg, MD). Sequencing reactions were performed using BigDye™ Terminator on ABI3730 or 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). Sequences were trimmed for quality and aligned using Sequencher™ (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI). Individual DNA sequences were compared alongside the known reference sequence for MFRP (UCSC genome browser, Representative Refseq: NM_031433).

Genotyping

Seventeen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were chosen to cover the MFRP gene and its flanking regions. We applied SNPSelector® [16] to select tagging SNPs that met the following two criteria: (1) a Pearson correlation (r2) of at least 0.67 in the linkage disequilibrium (LD) bins and (2) a minor allele frequency of at least 5% in the Caucasian population. The SNPs that were chosen were rs2509656, rs11217240, rs11217241, rs669462, rs948413, rs948414, rs10790289, rs12294677, rs12421909, rs883247, rs883245, rs3814758, rs12577147, rs11217244, rs7932692, rs10892353, and rs7122785. A custom TaqMan® allelic discrimination assay, which consisted of a mix of unlabeled PCR primers and the TaqMan® minor groove binding group (MGB) probe (FAM™ and VIC® dye-labeled; Applied Biosystems Inc.), was used. This assay comprised of two unlabeled PCR primers and two allele-specific probes. PCR reactions were performed with the Taqman® Universal PCR Master Mix on GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems Inc.), and the ABI7900HT Fast PCR System (Applied Biosystems Inc.) was used for reading the allelic discrimination calls.

Statistical analyses

For sequencing data, all SNPs were tested for association using the Fisher Exact Test with a significance level threshold of 0.05. For genotyping data, family-based Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (PDT) and Genotype Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (GenoPDT) were used to test for the association of markers in groups comprising of high myopes (≤5.00 D) and moderate-high hyperopes (≥+2.00 D) in comparison to control subjects (between +0.50 and −0.50 D).

Results

For the patient samples used for direct sequencing, the average spherical refractive error of the hyperopic patient group was +4.21 diopters (D; range +2.00 to +9.25 D) and of the myopic patient group was −12.36 D (range −8.25 to −14.50 D). The refractive status findings for the hyperopic and myopic patients are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Refractive status (sphere) findings of hyperopic and myopic subjects.

Moderate-high hyperopic subjects Refractive status OD (Diopters) Refractive status OS (Diopters)
1
+8.00
+9.25
2
+4.25
+4.00
3
+8.00
+9.25
4
+2.00
+2.00
5
+2.00
+2.25
6
+5.25
+3.75
7
+3.25
+2.25
8
+2.75
+3.00
9
+2.25
+3.25
10
+2.50
+2.50
11
+7.75
+3.25
High myopic subjects
Refractive status OD (Diopters)
Refractive status OS (Diopters)
12
−14.25
−14.5
13
−8.25
−7.875
14
−13.75
−13.625
15
−11.00
−9.875
16
−11.50
−11.375
17
−14.50
−13.50
18 −13.25 −14.00

Moderate to high hyperopic and high myopic patients were screened for MFRP sequence variants. Refractive error was measured using streak retinoscopy to the closest 0.25 diopters (D).

A total of 16 SNPs were identified by direct sequencing. A synonymous SNP (rs36015759) in exon 5 was observed in six hyperopic (five heterozygous, one substitution), six microphthalmic/anophthalmic, two high myopic, and five control subjects (all heterozygous). Five other known SNPs (rs883245 and rs883247 in the 5′ UTR, rs3814762 in exon 4, rs2510143 in exon 5, and rs948411 in intron 9) were observed in the hyperopic, microphthalmic/anophthalmic, and high-grade myopic patients as well as the control subjects (see Table 3 for details). In addition, 10 isolated, novel SNPs were identified in exons 5 (synonymous), 6 (non-synonymous), 8 (synonymous), 9 (non-synonymous), and 13 (3′ UTR) as well as in introns 8 and 11. No significant association was obtained for any SNP with any of the phenotypes studied. In addition, the family-based association study using a larger set of family data did not reveal any significant association of markers genotyped with either the hyperopic or myopic groups when compared to the control group. The results obtained from the family-based association PDT and GenoPDT analyses are listed in Table 4.

Table 3. Sequence variants observed in the MFRP gene by direct sequencing in various phenotypes studied.

MFRP gene
Location on Chromosome 11 (base pair)
Nucleotide change(s)
Amino acid change
dbSNP (rs#)
Subject phenotype
Hyperopia (n=11)
Microphthalmia (n=10)
High Myopia (n=7)
Controls (n=11)
Exon 1
118722521
C/T, C->T (sub)

rs883245
 (5′ UTR)
11
8
7
8

118722464
A/G,G->A (sub)

rs883247
 (5′ UTR)
11
8
7
7
Exon 4
118721714
A/G,G->A (sub)
Val->Met
rs3814762
 (non-synonymous)
6
5
5
7
Exon 5
118721489
T/C,C->T (sub)

rs36015759
 (synonymous)
6
6
2
5

118721441
C/T,T->C (sub)

rs2510143
 (synonymous)
11
10
6
11
Exon 6
118720829
A/G
Met->Val
Novel (non-synonymous)
1
0
0
0
Intron 8
118720229
A/C

Novel
2
0
2
1

118720230
C/T

Novel
0
0
0
1
Exon 8
118720283
G/A

Novel
0
0
2
0

118720256
A/G

rs35885438
 (synonymous)
0
1
0
0
Exon 9
118719814
A/G
Val->Met
Novel (non-synonymous)
1
0
0
0
Intron 9
118718992
A/T

rs948411
4
3
2
2
Intron 11
118718544
A/G

Novel
1
1
0
0
Exon 11
118718539
G/T
Ser->Iso
Novel (non-synonymous)
0
0
0
1

118718513
A/G

rs11217241
 (synonymous)
0
0
1
2
Exon 13 118717345 A/G Novel (3′ UTR) 1 0 0 0

Six novel and 7 known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified with sequence variant screening. None were associated with any of the phenotypes studied. The “rs” number refers to the reference cluster number of the polymorphism.

Table 4. Family-based association Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (PDT) and GenoPDT analyses.

Markers
Position
Hyperopia (>+2D) versus Normal (−0.5 to +0.5D)
High Myopia (≤-5D) versus Normal (−0.5 to +0.5D)
PDT
GenoPDT
PDT
GenoPDT
rs2509656
118713786
1.00
1.00
0.42
0.55
rs11217240
118715126
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
rs11217241
118718513
0.31
0.32
0.25
0.25
rs669462
118718715
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
rs948413
118719981
0.41
0.41
0.34
0.27
rs948414
118720008
0.32
0.32
0.63
0.35
rs10790289
118720375
0.37
0.37
0.59
0.86
rs12294677
118721107
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
rs12421909
118721111
0.24
0.4
0.36
0.47
rs883247
118722464
0.18
0.48
0.14
0.42
rs883245
118722521
0.31
0.31
0.24
0.4
rs3814758
118723028
0.18
0.48
0.42
0.75
rs12577147
118723858
0.32
0.32
0.07
0.21
rs11217244
118723994
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
rs7932692
118725222
0.18
0.48
0.58
0.87
rs10892353
118726659
0.32
0.51
0.54
0.78
rs7122785 118727916 0.18 0.48 0.71 0.18

p-values obtained from both tests for all the markers are listed. No significant association of markers was revealed with either the hyperopic or myopic groups when compared to the control group. D–diopters.

Discussion

There is strong evidence for a heritable effect for high hyperopia [17,18], microphthalmia [19,20], and high myopia [9]. The MFRP gene is predominantly expressed in the eye and at low levels in the brain [5,21], and its selective expression in the RPE makes it an ideal candidate gene for the proposed role in axial length regulation. During ocular axial length regulation, a retino-scleral signaling cascade has been postulated to explain the changes in the scleral structure and composition [22]. The RPE layer has been proposed to transmit these signals [23]. Furthermore, the potential for MFRP interactions (via the cysteine-rich domain) with WNT proteins is suggestive of a role in eye development and disease.

In this study, mutation screening of the MFRP gene revealed no sequence variants that would implicate this gene in the development of moderate to high hyperopia, isolated microphthalmia, isolated anophthalmia, or high-grade myopia. In addition, we presented a family-based association study of SNPs on the MFRP gene using a large family data set. We did not identify any significant association results for MFRP markers in moderate to high hyperopia and high-grade myopia phenotypes. The family-based association tests applied to this study are known to be robust against population stratification and appropriate for multiplex families such as those screened in this study [24,25].

Our results indicate that the MFRP gene may not be primarily involved in ocular axial length regulation. It is possible that MFRP performs a different role in disorders such as isolated nanophthalmos and syndromic microphthalmia (where mutations have been reported) both of which are recognized as developmental disorders unlike hyperopia and myopia. Although the microphthalmia/anophthalmia cohort in this study could be considered developmental, we did not observe any mutations in the MFRP gene in this cohort. However, isolated microphthalmia and anophthalmia (unlike syndromic) have been previously attributed to mutations in the retinal homeobox gene (CHX10) [26,27], which is in concurrence with the current findings, and future studies are needed to confirm this line of thought.

No mutations were observed in exons 5 and 10, which housed the previously reported MFRP gene mutations that resulted in a mutant protein [3,4]. However, we observed some coding synonymous (silent) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in exon 5 in six hyperopic and six microphthalmic/anophthalmic subjects (approximately 60%) in our sequencing data. While studies on the effect of silent SNPs on protein structure are still emerging, there is a new line of thought that silent SNPs can affect in vivo protein folding and function by altering translation kinetics [28,29]. Further studies are needed to prove this; however, if this is the case, there could be a potential role for the silent SNPs in the MFRP gene reported in this study and future research should take these findings into account.

Another possibility is that proteins that interact with the MFRP gene could be involved in the regulation of ocular axial length. It is reasonable to state that regulation of eye size is a complex process and is likely to involve multiple genes. While the previously reported MFRP mutations in isolated nanophthalmos and syndromic microphthalmia may not directly influence axial length programming, the resultant loss of MFRP interaction involved in axial length regulation could lead to reduced eye size in those phenotypes.

In conclusion, sequence variants of the MFRP gene do not appear to be associated with either the less severe forms of hyperopia, extreme forms of limited eye growth and development, or high myopia. Our findings indicate that MFRP is not primarily and directly involved in ocular axial length regulation. Future studies revealing gene mutations in disease phenotypes with altered ocular axial length and the relationship of MFRP with these mutant genes will shed more light on the precise role of MFRP.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to all the patient subjects and families who participated in this study. This work was supported by NIH Grant EY014685 and Research To Prevent Blindness Inc.

References

  • 1.Grosvenor T, Scott R. Role of the Axial Length Corneal Radius Ratio in Determining the Refractive State of the Eye. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71:573–9. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199409000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van Alphen G. On emmetropia and ametropia. Opt Acta (Lond) 1961;142(suppl):1–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sundin OH, Leppert GS, Silva ED, Yang JM, Dharmaraj S, Maumenee IH, Santos LC, Parsa CF, Traboulsi EI, Broman KW, Dibernardo C, Sunness JS, Toy J, Weinberg EM. Extreme hyperopia is the result of null mutations in MFRP, which encodes a Frizzled-related protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9553–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501451102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ayala-Ramirez R, Graue-Wiechers F, Robredo V, Amato-Almanza M, Horta-Diez I, Zenteno JC. A new autosomal recessive syndrome consisting of posterior microphthalmos, retinitis pigmentosa, foveoschisis, and optic disc drusen is caused by a MFRP gene mutation. Mol Vis. 2006;12:1483–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Katoh M. Molecular cloning and characterization of MFRP a novel gene encoding a membrane-type Frizzled-related protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;282:116–23. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Iongh RU, Abud HE, Hime GR. WNT/Frizzled signaling in eye development and disease. Front Biosci. 2006;11:2442–64. doi: 10.2741/1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morrison D, Fitzpatrick D, Hanson I, Williamson K, van Heyningen V, Fleck B, Jones I, Chalmers J, Campbell H. National study of microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma (MAC) in Scotland: investigation of genetic aetiology. J Med Genet. 2002;39:16–22. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Raju P, Ramesh SV, Arvind H, George R, Baskaran M, Paul PG, Kumaramanickavel G, McCarty C, Vijaya L. Prevalence of refractive errors in a rural south Indian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4268–72. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Young TL, Metlapally R, Shay AE. Complex trait genetics of refractive error. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:38–48. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.1.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Duke-Elder S. Ophthalmic Optics and Refraction. In: Duke-Elder S, editor. Mosby, St Louis: 1970: 207–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fledelius HC, Fuchs HJ, Rosenberg T. Oculometric characteristics of extreme hypermetropia in two Faroese families. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:762–8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200410000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fried M, Meyerschwickerath G, Koch A. Excessive Hypermetropia - Review and Case-Report Documented by Echography. Ann Ophthalmol. 1982;14:15–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Curtin BJ. The Myopias. Philadelphia: Harper & Row, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hotchkiss ML, Fine SL. Pathologic Myopia and Choroidal Neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;91:177–83. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(81)90170-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rein DB, Zhang P, Wirth KE, Lee PP, Hoerger TJ, McCall N, Klein R, Tielsch JM, Vijan S, Saaddine J. The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1754–60. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.12.1754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu H, Gregory SG, Hauser ER, Stenger JE, Pericak-Vance MA, Vance JM, Züchner S, Huaser MA. SNPselector: a web tool for selecting SNPs for genetic association studies. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:4181–6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fuchs J, Holm K, Vilhelmsen K, Rosenberg T, Scherfig E, Fledelius HC. Hereditary high hypermetropia in the Faroe Islands. Ophthalmic Genet. 2005;26:9–15. doi: 10.1080/13816810590918406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Othman MI, Sullivan SA, Skuta GL, Cockrell DA, Stringham HM, Downs CA, Fornés A, Mick A, Boehnke M, Vollrath D, Richards JE. Autosomal dominant nanophthalmos (NNO1) with high hyperopia and angle-closure glaucoma maps to chromosome 11. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:1411–8. doi: 10.1086/302113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Capella JA, Kaufman HE, Lill FJ. Hereditary cataracts and microphthalmia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1963;56:454–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(63)93132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yokoyama Y, Narahara K, Tsuji K, Ninomiya S, Seino Y. Autosomal dominant congenital cataract and microphthalmia associated with a familial t(2;16) translocation. Hum Genet. 1992;90:177–8. doi: 10.1007/BF00210770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kameya S, Hawes NL, Chang B, Heckenlively JR, Naggert JK, Nishina PM. Mfrp, a gene encoding a frizzled related protein, is mutated in the mouse retinal degeneration 6. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:1879–86. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.16.1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Christensen AM, Wallman J. Evidence that increased scleral growth underlines visual deprivation myopia in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2143–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wallman J, Winawer J. Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron. 2004;43:447–68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martin ER, Monks SA, Warren LL, Kaplan NL. A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: The pedigree disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67:146–54. doi: 10.1086/302957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Martin ER, Bass MP, Gilbert JR, Pericak-Vance MA, Hauser ER. Genotype-based association test for general pedigrees: The genotype-PDT. Genet Epidemiol. 2003;25:203–13. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bar-Yosef U, Abuelaish I, Harel T, Hendler N, Ofir R, Birk OS. CHX10 mutations cause non-syndromic microphthalmia/anophthalmia in Arab and Jewish kindreds. Hum Genet. 2004;115:302–9. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1154-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ferda Percin E, Ploder LA, Yu JJ, Arici K, Horsford DJ, Rutherford A, Bapat B, Cox DW, Duncan AM, Kalnins VI, Kocak-Altintas A, Sowden JC, Traboulsi E, Sarfarazi M, McInnes RR. Human microphthalmia associated with mutations in the retinal homeobox gene CHX10. Nat Genet. 2000;25:397–401. doi: 10.1038/78071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Oh JM, Kim IW, Sauna ZE, Calcagno AM, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MMA. “silent” polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science. 2007;315:525–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1135308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Komar AA. SNPs, silent but not invisible. Science. 2007;315:466–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1138239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China

RESOURCES