Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1999 May 1;516(Pt 3):630. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0630u.x

Kinases, myosin phosphatase and Rho proteins: curiouser and curiouser

Andrew P Somlyo 1
PMCID: PMC2269296  PMID: 10200412

The primary mechanism activating smooth muscle is phosphorylation of the myosin regulatory light chain (MLC20) by a myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) activated by Ca2+- calmodulin (CaM)-dependent phosphorylation; this allows actin to activate myosin ATPase, causing muscle to contract. Inactivation (relaxation) occurs as the result of dephosphorylation of MLC20 by a heterotrimeric smooth muscle myosin phosphatase, SMPP-1M (Hartshorne et al. 1998). Dephosphorylation of MLC20 was thought to be by an unregulated ‘housekeeping’ enzyme, until it was recognized that it can be regulated, independently of changes in [Ca2+]i, by G-protein-coupled cascades (Somlyo et al. 1989). These and related (Gallagher et al. 1997) signal transduction mechanisms play physiologically important roles in both smooth muscles and in non-muscle cells in which cytoplasmic myosin II motors are regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation (Somlyo & Somlyo, 1994). Two proteins involved in such mechanisms are reported in this issue of The Journal of Physiology.

An enzyme that can phosphorylate MLC20 in the absence of Ca2+-CaM is described by Walsh and co-workers (Weber et al. 1999). The activity of this Ca2+-independent kinase in permeabilized smooth muscle is unmasked when the phosphatase is inhibited by microcystin, tautomycin or calyculin. The altered balance between the activities of Ca2+-independent kinase and SMPP-1M increases MLC20 phosphorylation, causing contraction in the absence of Ca2+. The myosin kinase responsible has not been identified, although MLCK activated by autophosphorylation in the absence of Ca2+ has been a suspect (Tokui et al. 1995; Walker et al. 1998). Walsh and colleagues now show that, in addition to this weakly active autophosphorylated MLCK, there is also another Ca2+-independent myofibrillar kinase that is neither inhibited by MLCK inhibitors nor a protein kinase C. The physiological role of this ‘new’ enzyme is uncertain; its activity is low and the Ca2+-independent contractions induced by microcystin are extremely slow. Therefore, unless it can be activated by an as yet unknown messenger, it is unlikely to be a major contractile regulator. It may perform other, possibly important, physiological functions, with its ability to phosphorylate MLC20 unmasked only in the laboratory. Answers to this question should come from sequencing and cloning it.

The other paper (Loirand et al. 1999) deals with a recently discovered protein that impacts on a major pathway of signal transduction: regulation of SMPP-1M and, through it, myosin II. Activation of a variety of G-protein-coupled excitatory receptors or direct activation of G-proteins by GTPγS or AlF4 results in Ca2+-independent inhibition of MLC20 dephosphorylation and slowing of relaxation (Kitazawa et al. 1991) or, in the presence of MLC20 kinase activity, increased MLC20 phosphorylation and contraction (reviewed in Somlyo & Somlyo, 1994). The major upstream G-protein activating this Ca2+-sensitizing cascade is the monomeric GTPase RhoA, and the depression of the tonic component of agonist-induced contractions of intact smooth muscle by toxins (bacterial exoenzymes) that inactivate RhoA (Fujihara et al. 1997; Lucius et al. 1998) indicates the physiological importance of this mechanism. The downstream Ca2+-sensitizing effector of RhoA is Rho kinase, which phosphorylates the regulatory subunit of SMPP-1M and so inhibits the catalytic activity of the enzyme (Kimura et al. 1996). The highly selective Rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 reverses Ca2+ sensitization of smooth muscle (Uehata et al. 1997; Fu et al. 1998) and reduces blood pressure in hypertensive animals (Uehata et al. 1997), further indicating the pathophysiological importance of this pathway.

In resting cells, most RhoA is maintained as inactive cytoplasmic RhoA. GDP complexed with another protein, guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI). The discovery of another GTP-binding protein, Rnd1, that is an antagonist or negative regulator of the effects of RhoA on the cytoskeleton and is hormonally regulated (Loirand et al. 1999), was not expected. Rnd1 is a GTP-binding protein without detectable GTPase activity and occurs as Rnd1-GTP associated with the cell membrane through its farnesylated C-terminus. Its absence from the cytosol indicates that, unlike its geranylgeranylated relatives (rac, rho and CDC42), it does not form a complex with GDI. Prenylated Rnd1 inhibits agonist, GTPγS and recombinant RhoA induced Ca2+ sensitization of smooth muscle, while non-prenylated Rnd1 has very little or no such effect. Rnd1 inhibits Ca2+ sensitization by prenylated RhoA-GTP when added simultaneously, but does not reverse the effect of previously added RhoA, suggesting that inhibition occurs upstream: before or during activation of Rho-kinase. This and the fact that prenylation and, presumably, association with the membrane is required for Rnd1 to inhibit (Loirand et al. 1999) and RhoA to activate (Gong et al. 1996) the Rho-kinase pathway suggest that they compete for a common hydrophobic binding site. The Rnd1 content of aortic and ileum smooth muscle is increased by treatment with sex steroids, oestrogen and progesterone, and this increase is associated with a decrease in the Ca2+-sensitizing effects of agonists. Sex steroids also increase the concentration of other Ca2+-desensitizing messengers such as cAMP and cGMP, and of telokin, a protein that accelerates MLC20 dephosphorylation and relaxation of smooth muscle (Wu et al. 1998; Smith et al. 1998). These studies also underline the value of smooth muscle as an experimental paradigm of signalling systems operating in both muscle and non-muscle cells and modulating important mechanisms such as cell migration and cytokinesis, propelled by myosin II regulated by kinases and phosphatases. The complexity of these mechanisms is becoming more apparent as their studies delve deeper and deeper, like Alice into the rabbit hole.

References

  1. Fu X, et al. FEBS Letters. 1998;440:183–187. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01455-0. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01455-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fujihara H, et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 1997;8:2437–2447. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.12.2437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallagher PJ, et al. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 1997;18:1–16. doi: 10.1023/a:1018616814417. 10.1023/A:1018616814417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gong MC, et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 1996;93:1340–1345. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1340. 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartshorne DJ, et al. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 1998;19:325–341. doi: 10.1023/a:1005385302064. 10.1023/A:1005385302064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimura K, et al. Science. 1996;273:245–248. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kitazawa T, et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 1991;88:9307–9310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loirand GP, et al. The Journal of Physiology. 1999;516:825–834. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0825u.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lucius C, et al. The Journal of Physiology. 1998;506:83–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.083bx.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith AF, et al. American Journal of Physiology. 1998;274:C1188–1195. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.5.C1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Somlyo AP, et al. Advances in Protein Phosphatases. 1989;5:181–195. [Google Scholar]
  12. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Nature. 1994;372:231–236. doi: 10.1038/372231a0. 10.1038/372231a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tokui T, et al. Biochemistry. 1995;34:5173–5179. doi: 10.1021/bi00015a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Uehata M, et al. Nature. 1997;389:990–994. doi: 10.1038/40187. 10.1038/40187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Walker LA, et al. FASEB Journal. 1998;12:813–821. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.12.10.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weber LP, et al. The Journal of Physiology. 1999;516:805–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0805u.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu X, et al. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273:11362–11369. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.18.11362. 10.1074/jbc.273.18.11362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES