Skip to main content
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1988 Oct;76(4):295–305.

Monograph support provided by the National Library of Medicine and its regional medical libraries in the medical behavioral sciences.

J D Saye 1, B C Griffith 1
PMCID: PMC227066  PMID: 3224221

Abstract

The National Library of Medicine's (NLM) monographic resources in the medical behavioral sciences (MBS) were examined to assess NLM's ability to support the needs of researchers writing in this area. A sample of 239 representative monographs derived from citations in MBS-related articles published in 61 journals in 1981 were evaluated. These monographs were limited to works published between 1978 and 1981, inclusive. The subject distribution of the sample included fourteen of the twenty-one main classes in the LC classification, although BF (psychology), H (social sciences), and R (medicine) constituted 80.3% of the sample. The study revealed that NLM held 48.5% of the sample. The holdings of ten research medical libraries, including six of the seven regional medical libraries, were also evaluated in order to gauge NLM's ability to support that element of the medical library network. The holding rates of these libraries ranged widely (9.6% to 36%), although NLM was found to have far more extensive holdings overall, and when assessed against classes BF, H, and R. Overall, NLM could have supplied from 28.8% to 44.5% of the monographs not held by the medical libraries. In only a few cases were the ten medical libraries able to provide access to monographs not held by NLM. The findings of the study indicate that, regardless of NLM's indication of support to the MBS area, the holdings of more general research and academic libraries are essential to support the monograph needs of MBS researchers.

Full text

PDF
295

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Craig D. F., Strain P. M. Analysis of collection development at the National Library of Medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Apr;68(2):197–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Day R. A., Bowden V. M., Kronick D. A. Comparison of holdings of NLM (CATLINE) with those of resource libraries. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1979 Jan;67(1):25–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kronick D. A., Bowden V. M. Management data for collection analysis and development. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1978 Oct;66(4):407–413. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Orr R. H., Pings V. M., Pizer I. H., Olson E. E., Spencer C. C. Development of methodologic tools for planning and managing library services. II. Measuring a library's capability for providing documents. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1968 Jul;56(3):241–267. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES